Cargando…
The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 |
_version_ | 1782315415690543104 |
---|---|
author | Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Winkel, Per Lange, Theis Wetterslev, Jørn |
author_facet | Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Winkel, Per Lange, Theis Wetterslev, Jørn |
author_sort | Jakobsen, Janus Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not reflect the probability of getting a result assuming an alternative hypothesis to the null hypothesis is true. Second, a confidence interval or a P-value showing significance may be caused by multiplicity. Third, statistical significance does not necessarily result in clinical significance. Therefore, assessment of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials deserves more rigour in order to become more valid. METHODS: Several methodologies for assessing the statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials were considered. Balancing simplicity and comprehensiveness, a simple five-step procedure was developed. RESULTS: For a more valid assessment of results from a randomised clinical trial we propose the following five-steps: (1) report the confidence intervals and the exact P-values; (2) report Bayes factor for the primary outcome, being the ratio of the probability that a given trial result is compatible with a ‘null’ effect (corresponding to the P-value) divided by the probability that the trial result is compatible with the intervention effect hypothesised in the sample size calculation; (3) adjust the confidence intervals and the statistical significance threshold if the trial is stopped early or if interim analyses have been conducted; (4) adjust the confidence intervals and the P-values for multiplicity due to number of outcome comparisons; and (5) assess clinical significance of the trial results. CONCLUSIONS: If the proposed five-step procedure is followed, this may increase the validity of assessments of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4015863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40158632014-05-23 The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Winkel, Per Lange, Theis Wetterslev, Jørn BMC Med Res Methodol Correspondence BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not reflect the probability of getting a result assuming an alternative hypothesis to the null hypothesis is true. Second, a confidence interval or a P-value showing significance may be caused by multiplicity. Third, statistical significance does not necessarily result in clinical significance. Therefore, assessment of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials deserves more rigour in order to become more valid. METHODS: Several methodologies for assessing the statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials were considered. Balancing simplicity and comprehensiveness, a simple five-step procedure was developed. RESULTS: For a more valid assessment of results from a randomised clinical trial we propose the following five-steps: (1) report the confidence intervals and the exact P-values; (2) report Bayes factor for the primary outcome, being the ratio of the probability that a given trial result is compatible with a ‘null’ effect (corresponding to the P-value) divided by the probability that the trial result is compatible with the intervention effect hypothesised in the sample size calculation; (3) adjust the confidence intervals and the statistical significance threshold if the trial is stopped early or if interim analyses have been conducted; (4) adjust the confidence intervals and the P-values for multiplicity due to number of outcome comparisons; and (5) assess clinical significance of the trial results. CONCLUSIONS: If the proposed five-step procedure is followed, this may increase the validity of assessments of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BioMed Central 2014-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4015863/ /pubmed/24588900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jakobsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Winkel, Per Lange, Theis Wetterslev, Jørn The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title | The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title_full | The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title_fullStr | The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title_short | The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
title_sort | thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakobsenjanuschristian thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT gluudchristian thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT winkelper thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT langetheis thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT wetterslevjørn thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT jakobsenjanuschristian thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT gluudchristian thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT winkelper thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT langetheis thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials AT wetterslevjørn thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials |