Cargando…

The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakobsen, Janus Christian, Gluud, Christian, Winkel, Per, Lange, Theis, Wetterslev, Jørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34
_version_ 1782315415690543104
author Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Winkel, Per
Lange, Theis
Wetterslev, Jørn
author_facet Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Winkel, Per
Lange, Theis
Wetterslev, Jørn
author_sort Jakobsen, Janus Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not reflect the probability of getting a result assuming an alternative hypothesis to the null hypothesis is true. Second, a confidence interval or a P-value showing significance may be caused by multiplicity. Third, statistical significance does not necessarily result in clinical significance. Therefore, assessment of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials deserves more rigour in order to become more valid. METHODS: Several methodologies for assessing the statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials were considered. Balancing simplicity and comprehensiveness, a simple five-step procedure was developed. RESULTS: For a more valid assessment of results from a randomised clinical trial we propose the following five-steps: (1) report the confidence intervals and the exact P-values; (2) report Bayes factor for the primary outcome, being the ratio of the probability that a given trial result is compatible with a ‘null’ effect (corresponding to the P-value) divided by the probability that the trial result is compatible with the intervention effect hypothesised in the sample size calculation; (3) adjust the confidence intervals and the statistical significance threshold if the trial is stopped early or if interim analyses have been conducted; (4) adjust the confidence intervals and the P-values for multiplicity due to number of outcome comparisons; and (5) assess clinical significance of the trial results. CONCLUSIONS: If the proposed five-step procedure is followed, this may increase the validity of assessments of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4015863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40158632014-05-23 The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials Jakobsen, Janus Christian Gluud, Christian Winkel, Per Lange, Theis Wetterslev, Jørn BMC Med Res Methodol Correspondence BACKGROUND: Thresholds for statistical significance are insufficiently demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals or P-values when assessing results from randomised clinical trials. First, a P-value only shows the probability of getting a result assuming that the null hypothesis is true and does not reflect the probability of getting a result assuming an alternative hypothesis to the null hypothesis is true. Second, a confidence interval or a P-value showing significance may be caused by multiplicity. Third, statistical significance does not necessarily result in clinical significance. Therefore, assessment of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials deserves more rigour in order to become more valid. METHODS: Several methodologies for assessing the statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials were considered. Balancing simplicity and comprehensiveness, a simple five-step procedure was developed. RESULTS: For a more valid assessment of results from a randomised clinical trial we propose the following five-steps: (1) report the confidence intervals and the exact P-values; (2) report Bayes factor for the primary outcome, being the ratio of the probability that a given trial result is compatible with a ‘null’ effect (corresponding to the P-value) divided by the probability that the trial result is compatible with the intervention effect hypothesised in the sample size calculation; (3) adjust the confidence intervals and the statistical significance threshold if the trial is stopped early or if interim analyses have been conducted; (4) adjust the confidence intervals and the P-values for multiplicity due to number of outcome comparisons; and (5) assess clinical significance of the trial results. CONCLUSIONS: If the proposed five-step procedure is followed, this may increase the validity of assessments of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BioMed Central 2014-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4015863/ /pubmed/24588900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jakobsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Gluud, Christian
Winkel, Per
Lange, Theis
Wetterslev, Jørn
The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title_full The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title_fullStr The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title_short The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
title_sort thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-34
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobsenjanuschristian thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT gluudchristian thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT winkelper thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT langetheis thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT wetterslevjørn thethresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT jakobsenjanuschristian thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT gluudchristian thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT winkelper thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT langetheis thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT wetterslevjørn thresholdsforstatisticalandclinicalsignificanceafivestepprocedureforevaluationofinterventioneffectsinrandomisedclinicaltrials