Cargando…

The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting

BACKGROUND: After the 2011 cluster of Hendra virus cases in horses in Australia, public health targeted education initiatives at people in the equine industry to reduce human exposure to potentially infected horses. ‘Horse owners and Hendra Virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk’ aims t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawford, Kate, Dhand, Navneet K, Toribio, Jenny-Ann LML, Taylor, Melanie R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24552445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-182
_version_ 1782315435011604480
author Sawford, Kate
Dhand, Navneet K
Toribio, Jenny-Ann LML
Taylor, Melanie R
author_facet Sawford, Kate
Dhand, Navneet K
Toribio, Jenny-Ann LML
Taylor, Melanie R
author_sort Sawford, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After the 2011 cluster of Hendra virus cases in horses in Australia, public health targeted education initiatives at people in the equine industry to reduce human exposure to potentially infected horses. ‘Horse owners and Hendra Virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk’ aims to enhance public health measures through improved understanding of Hendra virus risk perception and risk mitigation strategies among horse owners and horse care providers. This paper describes the stakeholder consultation that was undertaken to ensure the cohort study outcomes were relevant to diverse groups who play a role in Hendra virus policy development and implementation. METHODS: A two-round modified Delphi study with online questionnaires was conducted. In round one, stakeholders identified priority research areas. In round two, stakeholders rated and ranked topics that emerged from thematic analysis of the round one responses. Round two data were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 255 stakeholders contacted, 101 responded to round one. Over 450 topics were proposed. These were organized into 18 themes. Approximately two thirds of the round one respondents participated in round two. ‘Hendra virus-related risk awareness and perception’, ‘personal health and safety’, ‘emergency preparedness’, ‘risk prevention, mitigation, and biosecurity’, and ‘Hendra virus vaccination in horses – attitudes/uptake’ were the top five areas identified according to probability of being ranked extremely important. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a modified Delphi approach was effective in guiding research into Hendra virus, a zoonotic disease of animal and human health significance. The findings support the notion that stakeholders should be engaged in zoonotic disease research priority setting. Such consultation will help to ensure that research initiatives are relevant and useful to stakeholders in the position to make use of new findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4015955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40159552014-05-10 The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting Sawford, Kate Dhand, Navneet K Toribio, Jenny-Ann LML Taylor, Melanie R BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: After the 2011 cluster of Hendra virus cases in horses in Australia, public health targeted education initiatives at people in the equine industry to reduce human exposure to potentially infected horses. ‘Horse owners and Hendra Virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk’ aims to enhance public health measures through improved understanding of Hendra virus risk perception and risk mitigation strategies among horse owners and horse care providers. This paper describes the stakeholder consultation that was undertaken to ensure the cohort study outcomes were relevant to diverse groups who play a role in Hendra virus policy development and implementation. METHODS: A two-round modified Delphi study with online questionnaires was conducted. In round one, stakeholders identified priority research areas. In round two, stakeholders rated and ranked topics that emerged from thematic analysis of the round one responses. Round two data were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 255 stakeholders contacted, 101 responded to round one. Over 450 topics were proposed. These were organized into 18 themes. Approximately two thirds of the round one respondents participated in round two. ‘Hendra virus-related risk awareness and perception’, ‘personal health and safety’, ‘emergency preparedness’, ‘risk prevention, mitigation, and biosecurity’, and ‘Hendra virus vaccination in horses – attitudes/uptake’ were the top five areas identified according to probability of being ranked extremely important. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a modified Delphi approach was effective in guiding research into Hendra virus, a zoonotic disease of animal and human health significance. The findings support the notion that stakeholders should be engaged in zoonotic disease research priority setting. Such consultation will help to ensure that research initiatives are relevant and useful to stakeholders in the position to make use of new findings. BioMed Central 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4015955/ /pubmed/24552445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-182 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sawford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sawford, Kate
Dhand, Navneet K
Toribio, Jenny-Ann LML
Taylor, Melanie R
The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title_full The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title_fullStr The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title_full_unstemmed The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title_short The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
title_sort use of a modified delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24552445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-182
work_keys_str_mv AT sawfordkate theuseofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT dhandnavneetk theuseofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT toribiojennyannlml theuseofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT taylormelanier theuseofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT sawfordkate useofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT dhandnavneetk useofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT toribiojennyannlml useofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting
AT taylormelanier useofamodifieddelphiapproachtoengagestakeholdersinzoonoticdiseaseresearchprioritysetting