Cargando…
Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the associat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36 |
_version_ | 1782315471176990720 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Shanhu Cai, Xue Chen, Xiang Yang, Bingquan Sun, Zilin |
author_facet | Qiu, Shanhu Cai, Xue Chen, Xiang Yang, Bingquan Sun, Zilin |
author_sort | Qiu, Shanhu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the association of step counter use with PA and glycemic control in T2D patients. METHODS: Articles were identified by searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 1994 to June 2013. RCTs in the English language were included, if they had assessed the effectiveness of step counters as motivating and monitoring tools in T2D patients, with reported changes in steps per day (steps/d) or glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or both. Data were independently collected by 2 authors and overall estimates were made by a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 551 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs were included. Step counter use significantly increased PA by 1,822 steps/d (7 studies, 861 participants; 95% confidence interval (CI): 751 to 2,894 steps/d) in patients with T2D. Step counter use with a PA goal showed a bigger increase in PA (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3,200 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,053 to 4,347 steps/d) than without (WMD 598 steps/d, 95% CI: −65 to 1,260 steps/d). Further subgroup analysis suggested step counter use with a self-set PA goal (WMD 2,816 steps/d, 95% CI: 1,288 to 4,344 steps/d) made no difference in increasing PA from a 10,000 steps/d goal (WMD 3,820 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,702 to 4,938 steps/d). However, no significant HbA1c change was observed by step counter use (10 studies, 1,423 participants; WMD 0.02%, 95% CI: −0.08% to 0.13%), either with (WMD 0.04%, 95% CI: −0.21% to 0.30%) or without a PA goal (WMD 0.01%, 95% CI: −0.10% to 0.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Step counter use is associated with a significant increase in PA in patients with T2D. However, evidence regarding its effect in improving glycemic control remains insufficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005236 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4016223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40162232014-05-11 Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Qiu, Shanhu Cai, Xue Chen, Xiang Yang, Bingquan Sun, Zilin BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the association of step counter use with PA and glycemic control in T2D patients. METHODS: Articles were identified by searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 1994 to June 2013. RCTs in the English language were included, if they had assessed the effectiveness of step counters as motivating and monitoring tools in T2D patients, with reported changes in steps per day (steps/d) or glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or both. Data were independently collected by 2 authors and overall estimates were made by a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 551 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs were included. Step counter use significantly increased PA by 1,822 steps/d (7 studies, 861 participants; 95% confidence interval (CI): 751 to 2,894 steps/d) in patients with T2D. Step counter use with a PA goal showed a bigger increase in PA (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3,200 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,053 to 4,347 steps/d) than without (WMD 598 steps/d, 95% CI: −65 to 1,260 steps/d). Further subgroup analysis suggested step counter use with a self-set PA goal (WMD 2,816 steps/d, 95% CI: 1,288 to 4,344 steps/d) made no difference in increasing PA from a 10,000 steps/d goal (WMD 3,820 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,702 to 4,938 steps/d). However, no significant HbA1c change was observed by step counter use (10 studies, 1,423 participants; WMD 0.02%, 95% CI: −0.08% to 0.13%), either with (WMD 0.04%, 95% CI: −0.21% to 0.30%) or without a PA goal (WMD 0.01%, 95% CI: −0.10% to 0.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Step counter use is associated with a significant increase in PA in patients with T2D. However, evidence regarding its effect in improving glycemic control remains insufficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005236 BioMed Central 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4016223/ /pubmed/24571580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36 Text en Copyright © 2014 Qiu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Qiu, Shanhu Cai, Xue Chen, Xiang Yang, Bingquan Sun, Zilin Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiushanhu stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT caixue stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenxiang stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangbingquan stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sunzilin stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |