Cargando…

Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Shanhu, Cai, Xue, Chen, Xiang, Yang, Bingquan, Sun, Zilin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36
_version_ 1782315471176990720
author Qiu, Shanhu
Cai, Xue
Chen, Xiang
Yang, Bingquan
Sun, Zilin
author_facet Qiu, Shanhu
Cai, Xue
Chen, Xiang
Yang, Bingquan
Sun, Zilin
author_sort Qiu, Shanhu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the association of step counter use with PA and glycemic control in T2D patients. METHODS: Articles were identified by searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 1994 to June 2013. RCTs in the English language were included, if they had assessed the effectiveness of step counters as motivating and monitoring tools in T2D patients, with reported changes in steps per day (steps/d) or glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or both. Data were independently collected by 2 authors and overall estimates were made by a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 551 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs were included. Step counter use significantly increased PA by 1,822 steps/d (7 studies, 861 participants; 95% confidence interval (CI): 751 to 2,894 steps/d) in patients with T2D. Step counter use with a PA goal showed a bigger increase in PA (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3,200 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,053 to 4,347 steps/d) than without (WMD 598 steps/d, 95% CI: −65 to 1,260 steps/d). Further subgroup analysis suggested step counter use with a self-set PA goal (WMD 2,816 steps/d, 95% CI: 1,288 to 4,344 steps/d) made no difference in increasing PA from a 10,000 steps/d goal (WMD 3,820 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,702 to 4,938 steps/d). However, no significant HbA1c change was observed by step counter use (10 studies, 1,423 participants; WMD 0.02%, 95% CI: −0.08% to 0.13%), either with (WMD 0.04%, 95% CI: −0.21% to 0.30%) or without a PA goal (WMD 0.01%, 95% CI: −0.10% to 0.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Step counter use is associated with a significant increase in PA in patients with T2D. However, evidence regarding its effect in improving glycemic control remains insufficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005236
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4016223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40162232014-05-11 Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Qiu, Shanhu Cai, Xue Chen, Xiang Yang, Bingquan Sun, Zilin BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: While step counter use has become popular among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity (PA) and improving glycemic control has been poorly defined. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the association of step counter use with PA and glycemic control in T2D patients. METHODS: Articles were identified by searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 1994 to June 2013. RCTs in the English language were included, if they had assessed the effectiveness of step counters as motivating and monitoring tools in T2D patients, with reported changes in steps per day (steps/d) or glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or both. Data were independently collected by 2 authors and overall estimates were made by a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 551 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs were included. Step counter use significantly increased PA by 1,822 steps/d (7 studies, 861 participants; 95% confidence interval (CI): 751 to 2,894 steps/d) in patients with T2D. Step counter use with a PA goal showed a bigger increase in PA (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3,200 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,053 to 4,347 steps/d) than without (WMD 598 steps/d, 95% CI: −65 to 1,260 steps/d). Further subgroup analysis suggested step counter use with a self-set PA goal (WMD 2,816 steps/d, 95% CI: 1,288 to 4,344 steps/d) made no difference in increasing PA from a 10,000 steps/d goal (WMD 3,820 steps/d, 95% CI: 2,702 to 4,938 steps/d). However, no significant HbA1c change was observed by step counter use (10 studies, 1,423 participants; WMD 0.02%, 95% CI: −0.08% to 0.13%), either with (WMD 0.04%, 95% CI: −0.21% to 0.30%) or without a PA goal (WMD 0.01%, 95% CI: −0.10% to 0.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Step counter use is associated with a significant increase in PA in patients with T2D. However, evidence regarding its effect in improving glycemic control remains insufficient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005236 BioMed Central 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4016223/ /pubmed/24571580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36 Text en Copyright © 2014 Qiu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiu, Shanhu
Cai, Xue
Chen, Xiang
Yang, Bingquan
Sun, Zilin
Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-36
work_keys_str_mv AT qiushanhu stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT caixue stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenxiang stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangbingquan stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sunzilin stepcounteruseintype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials