Cargando…

Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgeries of the soft palate have emerged as a less-invasive treatment for habitual snoring. To date, there is only limited information available comparing the effects of snoring sound between different minimally invasive surgeries in the treatment of habitual snoring....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Li-Ang, Yu, Jen-Fang, Lo, Yu-Lun, Chen, Ning-Hung, Fang, Tuan-Jen, Huang, Chung-Guei, Cheng, Wen-Nuan, Li, Hsueh-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24816691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097186
_version_ 1782315481782288384
author Lee, Li-Ang
Yu, Jen-Fang
Lo, Yu-Lun
Chen, Ning-Hung
Fang, Tuan-Jen
Huang, Chung-Guei
Cheng, Wen-Nuan
Li, Hsueh-Yu
author_facet Lee, Li-Ang
Yu, Jen-Fang
Lo, Yu-Lun
Chen, Ning-Hung
Fang, Tuan-Jen
Huang, Chung-Guei
Cheng, Wen-Nuan
Li, Hsueh-Yu
author_sort Lee, Li-Ang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgeries of the soft palate have emerged as a less-invasive treatment for habitual snoring. To date, there is only limited information available comparing the effects of snoring sound between different minimally invasive surgeries in the treatment of habitual snoring. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of palatal implant and radiofrequency surgery, in the reduction of snoring through subjective evaluation of snoring and objective snoring sound analysis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Thirty patients with habitual snoring due to palatal obstruction (apnea-hypopnea index ≤15, body max index ≤30) were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo a single session of palatal implant or temperature-controlled radiofrequency surgery of the soft palate under local anesthesia. Snoring was primarily evaluated by the patient with a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and at a 3-month follow-up visit and the change in VAS was the primary outcome. Moreover, life qualities, measured by snore outcomes survey, and full-night snoring sounds, analyzed by a sound analytic program (Snore Map), were also investigated at the same time. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study; 14 received palatal implant surgery and 14 underwent radiofrequency surgery. The VAS and snore outcomes survey scores were significantly improved in both groups. However, the good response (postoperative VAS ≤3 or postoperative VAS ≤5 plus snore outcomes survey score ≥60) rate of the palatal implant group was significantly higher than that of the radiofrequency group (79% vs. 29%, P = 0.021). The maximal loudness of low-frequency (40–300 Hz) snores was reduced significantly in the palatal implant group. In addition, the snoring index was significantly reduced in the radiofrequency group. CONCLUSIONS: Both palatal implants and a single-stage radiofrequency surgery improve subjective snoring outcomes, but palatal implants have a greater effect on most measures of subjective and objective snoring. Multi-stage radiofrequency surgery was not tested. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01955083
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4016275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40162752014-05-14 Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial Lee, Li-Ang Yu, Jen-Fang Lo, Yu-Lun Chen, Ning-Hung Fang, Tuan-Jen Huang, Chung-Guei Cheng, Wen-Nuan Li, Hsueh-Yu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgeries of the soft palate have emerged as a less-invasive treatment for habitual snoring. To date, there is only limited information available comparing the effects of snoring sound between different minimally invasive surgeries in the treatment of habitual snoring. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of palatal implant and radiofrequency surgery, in the reduction of snoring through subjective evaluation of snoring and objective snoring sound analysis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Thirty patients with habitual snoring due to palatal obstruction (apnea-hypopnea index ≤15, body max index ≤30) were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo a single session of palatal implant or temperature-controlled radiofrequency surgery of the soft palate under local anesthesia. Snoring was primarily evaluated by the patient with a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and at a 3-month follow-up visit and the change in VAS was the primary outcome. Moreover, life qualities, measured by snore outcomes survey, and full-night snoring sounds, analyzed by a sound analytic program (Snore Map), were also investigated at the same time. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study; 14 received palatal implant surgery and 14 underwent radiofrequency surgery. The VAS and snore outcomes survey scores were significantly improved in both groups. However, the good response (postoperative VAS ≤3 or postoperative VAS ≤5 plus snore outcomes survey score ≥60) rate of the palatal implant group was significantly higher than that of the radiofrequency group (79% vs. 29%, P = 0.021). The maximal loudness of low-frequency (40–300 Hz) snores was reduced significantly in the palatal implant group. In addition, the snoring index was significantly reduced in the radiofrequency group. CONCLUSIONS: Both palatal implants and a single-stage radiofrequency surgery improve subjective snoring outcomes, but palatal implants have a greater effect on most measures of subjective and objective snoring. Multi-stage radiofrequency surgery was not tested. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01955083 Public Library of Science 2014-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4016275/ /pubmed/24816691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097186 Text en © 2014 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Li-Ang
Yu, Jen-Fang
Lo, Yu-Lun
Chen, Ning-Hung
Fang, Tuan-Jen
Huang, Chung-Guei
Cheng, Wen-Nuan
Li, Hsueh-Yu
Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparative Effects of Snoring Sound between Two Minimally Invasive Surgeries in the Treatment of Snoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparative effects of snoring sound between two minimally invasive surgeries in the treatment of snoring: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24816691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097186
work_keys_str_mv AT leeliang comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yujenfang comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loyulun comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenninghung comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fangtuanjen comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangchungguei comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chengwennuan comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lihsuehyu comparativeeffectsofsnoringsoundbetweentwominimallyinvasivesurgeriesinthetreatmentofsnoringarandomizedcontrolledtrial