Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches have the potential to reduce procedure-related morbidity when compared with traditional approaches. However, the magnitude of radiographic correction and degree of clinical improvement with MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity remain undef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bach, Konrad, Ahmadian, Amir, Deukmedjian, Armen, Uribe, Juan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24488750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3441-5
_version_ 1782315499861835776
author Bach, Konrad
Ahmadian, Amir
Deukmedjian, Armen
Uribe, Juan S.
author_facet Bach, Konrad
Ahmadian, Amir
Deukmedjian, Armen
Uribe, Juan S.
author_sort Bach, Konrad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches have the potential to reduce procedure-related morbidity when compared with traditional approaches. However, the magnitude of radiographic correction and degree of clinical improvement with MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity remain undefined. QUESTION/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we sought to determine whether MIS approaches to adult spinal deformity correction (1) improve pain and function; (2) reliably correct deformity and result in fusion; and (3) are safe with respect to surgical and medical complications. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed and Medline databases was performed for published articles from 1950 to August 2013. A total of 1053 papers were identified. Thirteen papers were selected based on prespecified criteria, including a total of 262 patients. Studies with limited short-term followup (mean, 12.1 months; range, 1.5–39 months) were included to capture early complications. All of the papers included in the review constituted Level IV evidence. Patient age ranged from 20 to 86 years with a mean of 65.8 years. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were variable, but all required at minimum a diagnosis of adult degenerative scoliosis. RESULTS: Four studies demonstrated improvement in leg/back visual analog scale, three demonstrated improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index, one demonstrated improvement in treatment intensity scale, and one improvement in SF-36. Reported fusion rates ranged from 71.4% to 100% 1 year postoperatively, but only two of 13 papers relied consistently on CT scan to assess fusion, and, interestingly, only four of 10 studies reporting radiographic results on deformity correction found the procedures effective in correcting deformity. There were 115 complications reported among the 258 patients (46%), including 37 neurological complications (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The literature on these techniques is scanty; only two of the 13 studies that met inclusion criteria were considered high quality; CT scans were not generally used to evaluate fusion, deformity correction was inconsistent, and complication rates were high. Future directions for analysis must include comparative trials, longer-term followup, and consistent use of CT scans to assess for fusion to determine the role of MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4016426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40164262014-05-12 Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review Bach, Konrad Ahmadian, Amir Deukmedjian, Armen Uribe, Juan S. Clin Orthop Relat Res Symposium: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches have the potential to reduce procedure-related morbidity when compared with traditional approaches. However, the magnitude of radiographic correction and degree of clinical improvement with MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity remain undefined. QUESTION/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we sought to determine whether MIS approaches to adult spinal deformity correction (1) improve pain and function; (2) reliably correct deformity and result in fusion; and (3) are safe with respect to surgical and medical complications. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed and Medline databases was performed for published articles from 1950 to August 2013. A total of 1053 papers were identified. Thirteen papers were selected based on prespecified criteria, including a total of 262 patients. Studies with limited short-term followup (mean, 12.1 months; range, 1.5–39 months) were included to capture early complications. All of the papers included in the review constituted Level IV evidence. Patient age ranged from 20 to 86 years with a mean of 65.8 years. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were variable, but all required at minimum a diagnosis of adult degenerative scoliosis. RESULTS: Four studies demonstrated improvement in leg/back visual analog scale, three demonstrated improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index, one demonstrated improvement in treatment intensity scale, and one improvement in SF-36. Reported fusion rates ranged from 71.4% to 100% 1 year postoperatively, but only two of 13 papers relied consistently on CT scan to assess fusion, and, interestingly, only four of 10 studies reporting radiographic results on deformity correction found the procedures effective in correcting deformity. There were 115 complications reported among the 258 patients (46%), including 37 neurological complications (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The literature on these techniques is scanty; only two of the 13 studies that met inclusion criteria were considered high quality; CT scans were not generally used to evaluate fusion, deformity correction was inconsistent, and complication rates were high. Future directions for analysis must include comparative trials, longer-term followup, and consistent use of CT scans to assess for fusion to determine the role of MIS techniques for adult spinal deformity. Springer US 2014-02-01 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4016426/ /pubmed/24488750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3441-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Symposium: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
Bach, Konrad
Ahmadian, Amir
Deukmedjian, Armen
Uribe, Juan S.
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title_full Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title_short Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review
title_sort minimally invasive surgical techniques in adult degenerative spinal deformity: a systematic review
topic Symposium: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24488750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3441-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bachkonrad minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesinadultdegenerativespinaldeformityasystematicreview
AT ahmadianamir minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesinadultdegenerativespinaldeformityasystematicreview
AT deukmedjianarmen minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesinadultdegenerativespinaldeformityasystematicreview
AT uribejuans minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesinadultdegenerativespinaldeformityasystematicreview