Cargando…
Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
Peer review works as the hinge of the scientific process, mediating between research and the awareness/acceptance of its results. While it might seem obvious that science would regulate itself scientifically, the consensus on peer review is eroding; a deeper understanding of its workings and potenti...
Autores principales: | Paolucci, Mario, Grimaldo, Francisco |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4016809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1239-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reputation or peer review? The role of outliers
por: Grimaldo, Francisco, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Junk Science, Junk Journals, and Junk Publishing Management: Risk to Science’s Credibility
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Case for Junk DNA
por: Palazzo, Alexander F., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
e-Junk explosion.
por: Schmidt, Charles W
Publicado: (2002) -
Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
por: Casnici, Niccolò, et al.
Publicado: (2017)