Cargando…

Serum CA(19-9) in patients with solid pancreatic mass

AIM: This study evaluated the results and efficacy of serum CA (19-9) in determining the nature of a pancreatic solid mass in patients referred for investigation of possible malignancy. BACKGROUND: A wide variety of tumor markers have been proposed for pancreatic cancer but currently the only one wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baghbanian, Mahmud, Baghbanian, Ali, Salmanroghani, Hasan, Shabazkhani, Bijan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834242
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: This study evaluated the results and efficacy of serum CA (19-9) in determining the nature of a pancreatic solid mass in patients referred for investigation of possible malignancy. BACKGROUND: A wide variety of tumor markers have been proposed for pancreatic cancer but currently the only one with any practical usefulness for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of treatment is “CA (19-9)”. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This present study is a single center 2 year descriptive, prospective and case series studying patients with a pancreatic solid mass. RESULTS: Serum CA (19-9) was checked in 159 patients. The majority of patients were male (68%) and 81% had mass in the head of pancreas. Pathologic assessment revealed 131 adenocarcinomas (82%), 10 other malignancies (6%), 7 benign lesion (4%) and was non-diagnostic in 11 cases (7%). Mean level of this tumor marker in patients with adenocarcinoma, non-adenocarcinoma malignancy, benign and non-diagnostic pathology was 1094, 1004, 120, 259 U/ML respectively. With regarding 58 U/ML as a cutoff point; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of this tumor marker for diagnosing the adenocarcinoma were 85%, 67%, 88%, 60% and 81% respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant relationship between Serum CA (19-9) value and histopathology of solid pancreatic mass. This marker has limited sensitivity and specificity and cannot be used as a definite diagnostic test. So the use of CA (19-9) for the differentiation of pancreatic cancer should be applied on an individual case basis, depending on the clinical situation and imaging findings.