Cargando…

Specific count model for investing the related factors of cost of GERD and functional dyspepsia

AIM: The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost of GERD and functional dyspepsia for investing its related factors. BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease GERD and dyspepsia are the most common symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders. Recent studies showed high prevalence and variety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abadi, Alireza, Pourhoseingholi, Asma, Chaibakhsh, Samira, Safaee, Azadeh, Moghimi-Dehkordi, Bijan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834282
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost of GERD and functional dyspepsia for investing its related factors. BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease GERD and dyspepsia are the most common symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders. Recent studies showed high prevalence and variety of clinical presentation of these two symptoms imposed enormous economic burden to the society. Cost data that related to economics burden have specific characteristics. So this kind of data needs to specific models. Poisson regression (PR) and negative binomial regression (NB) are the models that were used for analyzing cost data in this paper. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study designed as a cross-sectional household survey from May 2006 to December 2007 on a random sample of individual in the Tehran province, Iran to find the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders and its related factors. The Cost in each item was counted. PR and NB were carried out to the data respectively. Likelihood ratio test was performed for comparison between models. Also Log likelihood, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to compare performance of the models. RESULTS: According to Likelihood ratio test and all three criterions that we used to compare performance of the models, NB was the best model for analyzing this cost data. Sex, age and insurance statues were being significant. CONCLUSION: PR and NB models were carried out for this data and according the results improved fit of the NB model over PR, it clearly indicates that over-dispersion is involved due to unobserved heterogeneity and/or clustering. NB model in cost data more appropriate fit than PR.