Cargando…

Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Randell, Rebecca, Greenhalgh, Joanne, Hindmarsh, Jon, Dowding, Dawn, Jayne, David, Pearman, Alan, Gardner, Peter, Croft, Julie, Kotze, Alwyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52
_version_ 1782480026926579712
author Randell, Rebecca
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Dowding, Dawn
Jayne, David
Pearman, Alan
Gardner, Peter
Croft, Julie
Kotze, Alwyn
author_facet Randell, Rebecca
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Dowding, Dawn
Jayne, David
Pearman, Alan
Gardner, Peter
Croft, Julie
Kotze, Alwyn
author_sort Randell, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physically separated from the patient and the rest of the team, with the potential to negatively impact teamwork in the operating theatre. The aim of this study is to ascertain: how and under what circumstances robotic surgery is effectively introduced into routine practice; and how and under what circumstances robotic surgery impacts teamwork, communication and decision making, and subsequent patient outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: We will undertake a process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Realist evaluation provides an overall framework for the study. The study will be in three phases. In Phase I, grey literature will be reviewed to identify stakeholders’ theories concerning how robotic surgery becomes embedded into surgical practice and its impacts. These theories will be refined and added to through interviews conducted across English hospitals that are using robotic surgery for rectal cancer resection with staff at different levels of the organisation, along with a review of documentation associated with the introduction of robotic surgery. In Phase II, a multi-site case study will be conducted across four English hospitals to test and refine the candidate theories. Data will be collected using multiple methods: the structured observation tool OTAS (Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery); video recordings of operations; ethnographic observation; and interviews. In Phase III, interviews will be conducted at the four case sites with staff representing a range of surgical disciplines, to assess the extent to which the results of Phase II are generalisable and to refine the resulting theories to reflect the experience of a broader range of surgical disciplines. The study will provide (i) guidance to healthcare organisations on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation and integration of robotic surgery, and (ii) guidance on how to ensure effective communication and teamwork when undertaking robotic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4017969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40179692014-05-13 Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol Randell, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Dowding, Dawn Jayne, David Pearman, Alan Gardner, Peter Croft, Julie Kotze, Alwyn Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physically separated from the patient and the rest of the team, with the potential to negatively impact teamwork in the operating theatre. The aim of this study is to ascertain: how and under what circumstances robotic surgery is effectively introduced into routine practice; and how and under what circumstances robotic surgery impacts teamwork, communication and decision making, and subsequent patient outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: We will undertake a process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Realist evaluation provides an overall framework for the study. The study will be in three phases. In Phase I, grey literature will be reviewed to identify stakeholders’ theories concerning how robotic surgery becomes embedded into surgical practice and its impacts. These theories will be refined and added to through interviews conducted across English hospitals that are using robotic surgery for rectal cancer resection with staff at different levels of the organisation, along with a review of documentation associated with the introduction of robotic surgery. In Phase II, a multi-site case study will be conducted across four English hospitals to test and refine the candidate theories. Data will be collected using multiple methods: the structured observation tool OTAS (Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery); video recordings of operations; ethnographic observation; and interviews. In Phase III, interviews will be conducted at the four case sites with staff representing a range of surgical disciplines, to assess the extent to which the results of Phase II are generalisable and to refine the resulting theories to reflect the experience of a broader range of surgical disciplines. The study will provide (i) guidance to healthcare organisations on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation and integration of robotic surgery, and (ii) guidance on how to ensure effective communication and teamwork when undertaking robotic surgery. BioMed Central 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4017969/ /pubmed/24885669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 Text en Copyright © 2014 Randell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Randell, Rebecca
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Hindmarsh, Jon
Dowding, Dawn
Jayne, David
Pearman, Alan
Gardner, Peter
Croft, Julie
Kotze, Alwyn
Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title_full Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title_fullStr Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title_full_unstemmed Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title_short Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
title_sort integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52
work_keys_str_mv AT randellrebecca integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT greenhalghjoanne integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT hindmarshjon integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT dowdingdawn integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT jaynedavid integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT pearmanalan integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT gardnerpeter integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT croftjulie integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol
AT kotzealwyn integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol