Cargando…
Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 |
_version_ | 1782480026926579712 |
---|---|
author | Randell, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Dowding, Dawn Jayne, David Pearman, Alan Gardner, Peter Croft, Julie Kotze, Alwyn |
author_facet | Randell, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Dowding, Dawn Jayne, David Pearman, Alan Gardner, Peter Croft, Julie Kotze, Alwyn |
author_sort | Randell, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physically separated from the patient and the rest of the team, with the potential to negatively impact teamwork in the operating theatre. The aim of this study is to ascertain: how and under what circumstances robotic surgery is effectively introduced into routine practice; and how and under what circumstances robotic surgery impacts teamwork, communication and decision making, and subsequent patient outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: We will undertake a process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Realist evaluation provides an overall framework for the study. The study will be in three phases. In Phase I, grey literature will be reviewed to identify stakeholders’ theories concerning how robotic surgery becomes embedded into surgical practice and its impacts. These theories will be refined and added to through interviews conducted across English hospitals that are using robotic surgery for rectal cancer resection with staff at different levels of the organisation, along with a review of documentation associated with the introduction of robotic surgery. In Phase II, a multi-site case study will be conducted across four English hospitals to test and refine the candidate theories. Data will be collected using multiple methods: the structured observation tool OTAS (Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery); video recordings of operations; ethnographic observation; and interviews. In Phase III, interviews will be conducted at the four case sites with staff representing a range of surgical disciplines, to assess the extent to which the results of Phase II are generalisable and to refine the resulting theories to reflect the experience of a broader range of surgical disciplines. The study will provide (i) guidance to healthcare organisations on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation and integration of robotic surgery, and (ii) guidance on how to ensure effective communication and teamwork when undertaking robotic surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4017969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40179692014-05-13 Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol Randell, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Dowding, Dawn Jayne, David Pearman, Alan Gardner, Peter Croft, Julie Kotze, Alwyn Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physically separated from the patient and the rest of the team, with the potential to negatively impact teamwork in the operating theatre. The aim of this study is to ascertain: how and under what circumstances robotic surgery is effectively introduced into routine practice; and how and under what circumstances robotic surgery impacts teamwork, communication and decision making, and subsequent patient outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: We will undertake a process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Realist evaluation provides an overall framework for the study. The study will be in three phases. In Phase I, grey literature will be reviewed to identify stakeholders’ theories concerning how robotic surgery becomes embedded into surgical practice and its impacts. These theories will be refined and added to through interviews conducted across English hospitals that are using robotic surgery for rectal cancer resection with staff at different levels of the organisation, along with a review of documentation associated with the introduction of robotic surgery. In Phase II, a multi-site case study will be conducted across four English hospitals to test and refine the candidate theories. Data will be collected using multiple methods: the structured observation tool OTAS (Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery); video recordings of operations; ethnographic observation; and interviews. In Phase III, interviews will be conducted at the four case sites with staff representing a range of surgical disciplines, to assess the extent to which the results of Phase II are generalisable and to refine the resulting theories to reflect the experience of a broader range of surgical disciplines. The study will provide (i) guidance to healthcare organisations on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation and integration of robotic surgery, and (ii) guidance on how to ensure effective communication and teamwork when undertaking robotic surgery. BioMed Central 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4017969/ /pubmed/24885669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 Text en Copyright © 2014 Randell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Randell, Rebecca Greenhalgh, Joanne Hindmarsh, Jon Dowding, Dawn Jayne, David Pearman, Alan Gardner, Peter Croft, Julie Kotze, Alwyn Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title | Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title_full | Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title_fullStr | Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title_short | Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
title_sort | integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-52 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randellrebecca integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT greenhalghjoanne integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT hindmarshjon integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT dowdingdawn integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT jaynedavid integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT pearmanalan integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT gardnerpeter integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT croftjulie integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol AT kotzealwyn integrationofroboticsurgeryintoroutinepracticeandimpactsoncommunicationcollaborationanddecisionmakingarealistprocessevaluationprotocol |