Cargando…

A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol

BACKGROUND: Vitamin A supplementation significantly reduces all-cause mortality when given between 6–59 months of age, but has a null or detrimental effect when given between 1–5 months. Studies of neonatal vitamin A supplementation conducted across Africa and South Asia have produced conflicting fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonald, Suzanna LR, Savy, Mathilde, Fulford, Anthony JC, Kendall, Lindsay, Flanagan, Katie L, Prentice, Andrew M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-92
_version_ 1782480072132788224
author McDonald, Suzanna LR
Savy, Mathilde
Fulford, Anthony JC
Kendall, Lindsay
Flanagan, Katie L
Prentice, Andrew M
author_facet McDonald, Suzanna LR
Savy, Mathilde
Fulford, Anthony JC
Kendall, Lindsay
Flanagan, Katie L
Prentice, Andrew M
author_sort McDonald, Suzanna LR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vitamin A supplementation significantly reduces all-cause mortality when given between 6–59 months of age, but has a null or detrimental effect when given between 1–5 months. Studies of neonatal vitamin A supplementation conducted across Africa and South Asia have produced conflicting findings. These age-pattern variations might result from immunological interactions between vitamin A supplementation and vaccines. Knowledge on the potential immunological sequelae of human neonatal vitamin A supplementation is so scarce that the foremost aim of this study is to seek indicative data on aspects of immunity likely to be affected by neonatal vitamin A supplementation. The objective of this trial is to test whether human neonatal vitamin A supplementation modulates immune function including improved thymic maturation in infancy and improved systemic immune responses to routine immunization. METHODS/DESIGN: In an area of moderate vitamin A deficiency in a peri-urban area of The Gambia, 200 mother–infant pairs were enrolled in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Within 48 hours of birth, neonates were randomised with stratification by birth weight and sex to receive either an oral dose of 50,000 IU vitamin A or placebo. Expanded Programme of Immunisation birth vaccinations were administered after supplementation, with subsequent vaccinations administered at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. A range of immunological outcomes were examined up to 17 weeks of age, with additional morbidity and anthropometry follow-up carried out throughout the first year of life. The primary endpoint of this trial is the frequency of circulating T regulatory (T(reg)) cells expressing gut homing receptors in infants at 17 week post-supplementation, with secondary outcomes including thymus maturation and B cell immune responses. DISCUSSION: Indicative immunological data from this trial (and its Bangladeshi counterpart), will complement the larger randomised controlled trials (conducted in India, Tanzania and Ghana), on the effectiveness and safety of neonatal vitamin A supplementation in improving infant survival. Combined these trials, in addition to the existing trials, will inform policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01476358
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4018469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40184692014-05-14 A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol McDonald, Suzanna LR Savy, Mathilde Fulford, Anthony JC Kendall, Lindsay Flanagan, Katie L Prentice, Andrew M BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Vitamin A supplementation significantly reduces all-cause mortality when given between 6–59 months of age, but has a null or detrimental effect when given between 1–5 months. Studies of neonatal vitamin A supplementation conducted across Africa and South Asia have produced conflicting findings. These age-pattern variations might result from immunological interactions between vitamin A supplementation and vaccines. Knowledge on the potential immunological sequelae of human neonatal vitamin A supplementation is so scarce that the foremost aim of this study is to seek indicative data on aspects of immunity likely to be affected by neonatal vitamin A supplementation. The objective of this trial is to test whether human neonatal vitamin A supplementation modulates immune function including improved thymic maturation in infancy and improved systemic immune responses to routine immunization. METHODS/DESIGN: In an area of moderate vitamin A deficiency in a peri-urban area of The Gambia, 200 mother–infant pairs were enrolled in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Within 48 hours of birth, neonates were randomised with stratification by birth weight and sex to receive either an oral dose of 50,000 IU vitamin A or placebo. Expanded Programme of Immunisation birth vaccinations were administered after supplementation, with subsequent vaccinations administered at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. A range of immunological outcomes were examined up to 17 weeks of age, with additional morbidity and anthropometry follow-up carried out throughout the first year of life. The primary endpoint of this trial is the frequency of circulating T regulatory (T(reg)) cells expressing gut homing receptors in infants at 17 week post-supplementation, with secondary outcomes including thymus maturation and B cell immune responses. DISCUSSION: Indicative immunological data from this trial (and its Bangladeshi counterpart), will complement the larger randomised controlled trials (conducted in India, Tanzania and Ghana), on the effectiveness and safety of neonatal vitamin A supplementation in improving infant survival. Combined these trials, in addition to the existing trials, will inform policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01476358 BioMed Central 2014-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4018469/ /pubmed/24708735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-92 Text en Copyright © 2014 McDonald et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
McDonald, Suzanna LR
Savy, Mathilde
Fulford, Anthony JC
Kendall, Lindsay
Flanagan, Katie L
Prentice, Andrew M
A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title_full A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title_fullStr A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title_full_unstemmed A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title_short A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol
title_sort double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin a supplementation on immune responses: the gambia protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-92
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaldsuzannalr adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT savymathilde adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT fulfordanthonyjc adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT kendalllindsay adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT flanagankatiel adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT prenticeandrewm adoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT mcdonaldsuzannalr doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT savymathilde doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT fulfordanthonyjc doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT kendalllindsay doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT flanagankatiel doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol
AT prenticeandrewm doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialinneonatestodeterminetheeffectofvitaminasupplementationonimmuneresponsesthegambiaprotocol