Cargando…

Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition

This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hope, Thomas M. H., Prejawa, Susan, Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi, Oberhuber, Marion, Seghier, Mohamed L., Green, David W., Price, Cathy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246
_version_ 1782480090912784384
author Hope, Thomas M. H.
Prejawa, Susan
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Oberhuber, Marion
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Green, David W.
Price, Cathy J.
author_facet Hope, Thomas M. H.
Prejawa, Susan
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Oberhuber, Marion
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Green, David W.
Price, Cathy J.
author_sort Hope, Thomas M. H.
collection PubMed
description This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semantic to non-semantic inputs; and (4) speech production to finger-press responses. The stimuli included words (semantic and phonological inputs), pseudowords (phonological input), pictures and sounds of animals or objects (semantic input), and colored patterns and hums (non-semantic and non-phonological). The speech production tasks involved auditory repetition, reading, and naming while the finger press tasks involved one-back matching. The results from the main effects and interactions were compared to predictions from a previously reported functional anatomical model of language based on a meta-analysis of many different neuroimaging experiments. Although many findings from the current experiment replicated many of those predicted, our within-subject design also revealed novel results by providing sufficient anatomical precision to dissect several different regions within the anterior insula, pars orbitalis, anterior cingulate, SMA, and cerebellum. For example, we found one part of the pars orbitalis was involved in phonological processing and another in semantic processing. We also dissociated four different types of phonological effects in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), left putamen, left ventral premotor cortex, and left pars orbitalis. Our findings challenge some of the commonly-held opinions on the functional anatomy of language, and resolve some previously conflicting findings about specific brain regions—and our experimental design reveals details of the word repetition process that are not well captured by current models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4018561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40185612014-05-15 Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition Hope, Thomas M. H. Prejawa, Susan Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Oberhuber, Marion Seghier, Mohamed L. Green, David W. Price, Cathy J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semantic to non-semantic inputs; and (4) speech production to finger-press responses. The stimuli included words (semantic and phonological inputs), pseudowords (phonological input), pictures and sounds of animals or objects (semantic input), and colored patterns and hums (non-semantic and non-phonological). The speech production tasks involved auditory repetition, reading, and naming while the finger press tasks involved one-back matching. The results from the main effects and interactions were compared to predictions from a previously reported functional anatomical model of language based on a meta-analysis of many different neuroimaging experiments. Although many findings from the current experiment replicated many of those predicted, our within-subject design also revealed novel results by providing sufficient anatomical precision to dissect several different regions within the anterior insula, pars orbitalis, anterior cingulate, SMA, and cerebellum. For example, we found one part of the pars orbitalis was involved in phonological processing and another in semantic processing. We also dissociated four different types of phonological effects in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), left putamen, left ventral premotor cortex, and left pars orbitalis. Our findings challenge some of the commonly-held opinions on the functional anatomy of language, and resolve some previously conflicting findings about specific brain regions—and our experimental design reveals details of the word repetition process that are not well captured by current models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4018561/ /pubmed/24834043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hope, Prejawa, Parker Jones, Oberhuber, Seghier, Green and Price. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hope, Thomas M. H.
Prejawa, Susan
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Oberhuber, Marion
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Green, David W.
Price, Cathy J.
Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title_full Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title_fullStr Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title_full_unstemmed Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title_short Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
title_sort dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246
work_keys_str_mv AT hopethomasmh dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT prejawasusan dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT parkerjonesoiwi dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT oberhubermarion dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT seghiermohamedl dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT greendavidw dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition
AT pricecathyj dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition