Cargando…
Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246 |
_version_ | 1782480090912784384 |
---|---|
author | Hope, Thomas M. H. Prejawa, Susan Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Oberhuber, Marion Seghier, Mohamed L. Green, David W. Price, Cathy J. |
author_facet | Hope, Thomas M. H. Prejawa, Susan Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Oberhuber, Marion Seghier, Mohamed L. Green, David W. Price, Cathy J. |
author_sort | Hope, Thomas M. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semantic to non-semantic inputs; and (4) speech production to finger-press responses. The stimuli included words (semantic and phonological inputs), pseudowords (phonological input), pictures and sounds of animals or objects (semantic input), and colored patterns and hums (non-semantic and non-phonological). The speech production tasks involved auditory repetition, reading, and naming while the finger press tasks involved one-back matching. The results from the main effects and interactions were compared to predictions from a previously reported functional anatomical model of language based on a meta-analysis of many different neuroimaging experiments. Although many findings from the current experiment replicated many of those predicted, our within-subject design also revealed novel results by providing sufficient anatomical precision to dissect several different regions within the anterior insula, pars orbitalis, anterior cingulate, SMA, and cerebellum. For example, we found one part of the pars orbitalis was involved in phonological processing and another in semantic processing. We also dissociated four different types of phonological effects in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), left putamen, left ventral premotor cortex, and left pars orbitalis. Our findings challenge some of the commonly-held opinions on the functional anatomy of language, and resolve some previously conflicting findings about specific brain regions—and our experimental design reveals details of the word repetition process that are not well captured by current models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4018561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40185612014-05-15 Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition Hope, Thomas M. H. Prejawa, Susan Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Oberhuber, Marion Seghier, Mohamed L. Green, David W. Price, Cathy J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This fMRI study used a single, multi-factorial, within-subjects design to dissociate multiple linguistic and non-linguistic processing areas that are all involved in repeating back heard words. The study compared: (1) auditory to visual inputs; (2) phonological to non-phonological inputs; (3) semantic to non-semantic inputs; and (4) speech production to finger-press responses. The stimuli included words (semantic and phonological inputs), pseudowords (phonological input), pictures and sounds of animals or objects (semantic input), and colored patterns and hums (non-semantic and non-phonological). The speech production tasks involved auditory repetition, reading, and naming while the finger press tasks involved one-back matching. The results from the main effects and interactions were compared to predictions from a previously reported functional anatomical model of language based on a meta-analysis of many different neuroimaging experiments. Although many findings from the current experiment replicated many of those predicted, our within-subject design also revealed novel results by providing sufficient anatomical precision to dissect several different regions within the anterior insula, pars orbitalis, anterior cingulate, SMA, and cerebellum. For example, we found one part of the pars orbitalis was involved in phonological processing and another in semantic processing. We also dissociated four different types of phonological effects in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), left putamen, left ventral premotor cortex, and left pars orbitalis. Our findings challenge some of the commonly-held opinions on the functional anatomy of language, and resolve some previously conflicting findings about specific brain regions—and our experimental design reveals details of the word repetition process that are not well captured by current models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4018561/ /pubmed/24834043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hope, Prejawa, Parker Jones, Oberhuber, Seghier, Green and Price. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Hope, Thomas M. H. Prejawa, Susan Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Oberhuber, Marion Seghier, Mohamed L. Green, David W. Price, Cathy J. Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title | Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title_full | Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title_fullStr | Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title_full_unstemmed | Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title_short | Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
title_sort | dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24834043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hopethomasmh dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT prejawasusan dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT parkerjonesoiwi dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT oberhubermarion dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT seghiermohamedl dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT greendavidw dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition AT pricecathyj dissectingthefunctionalanatomyofauditorywordrepetition |