Cargando…
Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation
INTRODUCTION: Increasedlife expectancy in populations has brought along specific new scenarios in the fields of medicine for the elderly; prevalence of physical complications such as edentulism and patients with dentures is growing. Management of anesthesia and ventilation in this group of patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829737 |
_version_ | 1782480095979503616 |
---|---|
author | Golzari, Samad EJ Soleimanpour, Hassan Mehryar, Hamidreza Salarilak, Shaker Mahmoodpoor, Ata Panahi, Jafar Rahimi Afhami, Mohammadreza Sabahi, Majid Hassani, Zahra |
author_facet | Golzari, Samad EJ Soleimanpour, Hassan Mehryar, Hamidreza Salarilak, Shaker Mahmoodpoor, Ata Panahi, Jafar Rahimi Afhami, Mohammadreza Sabahi, Majid Hassani, Zahra |
author_sort | Golzari, Samad EJ |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Increasedlife expectancy in populations has brought along specific new scenarios in the fields of medicine for the elderly; prevalence of physical complications such as edentulism and patients with dentures is growing. Management of anesthesia and ventilation in this group of patients has turned into a great challenge. Some researchers suggest dentures to be left in place during bag-mask ventilation; yet, no unanimous agreement exists in this regard. METHODS: In a single blind randomized clinical trial, we studied 300 patients with ASA class I, II (American Society of Anesthesiologists), Mallampati class (I, II) and aged over 55 years in three groups. After induction of anesthesia, in group G dentures were removed and in each buccal space an eight-layer 10 × 10 cm gauze and an oral airway were placed. In group D, the dentures and an oral airway were left in place. In group C (control), after removing dentures just an appropriate oral airway was placed. Then, each three group underwent bag-mask ventilation. Success of bag-mask ventilation (BMV) was considered as increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide to more than 20 mmHg and back to baseline with fresh gas flow of 3 L/min and adjustable pressure limiting valve pressure of 20 cm H(2)O. Success rates were evaluated between groups. RESULTS: Effective BMV was possible in 91 (91%), 64 (64%) and 41 (41%) patients in groups G, D and C respectively. The differences were statistically significant. Successful BMV rate was significantly higher in female patients in group G compared to group C; 43/44 versus 25/46 individuals, P = 0.0001, odds ratio = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (0.00, 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Leaving dentures in place in edentulous patients after inducing anesthesia improves bag-mask ventilation. However, placing folded compressed gauze in buccal space leads to more significant improvement in BMV compared to leaving dentures in place. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4018598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40185982014-05-14 Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation Golzari, Samad EJ Soleimanpour, Hassan Mehryar, Hamidreza Salarilak, Shaker Mahmoodpoor, Ata Panahi, Jafar Rahimi Afhami, Mohammadreza Sabahi, Majid Hassani, Zahra Int J Prev Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Increasedlife expectancy in populations has brought along specific new scenarios in the fields of medicine for the elderly; prevalence of physical complications such as edentulism and patients with dentures is growing. Management of anesthesia and ventilation in this group of patients has turned into a great challenge. Some researchers suggest dentures to be left in place during bag-mask ventilation; yet, no unanimous agreement exists in this regard. METHODS: In a single blind randomized clinical trial, we studied 300 patients with ASA class I, II (American Society of Anesthesiologists), Mallampati class (I, II) and aged over 55 years in three groups. After induction of anesthesia, in group G dentures were removed and in each buccal space an eight-layer 10 × 10 cm gauze and an oral airway were placed. In group D, the dentures and an oral airway were left in place. In group C (control), after removing dentures just an appropriate oral airway was placed. Then, each three group underwent bag-mask ventilation. Success of bag-mask ventilation (BMV) was considered as increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide to more than 20 mmHg and back to baseline with fresh gas flow of 3 L/min and adjustable pressure limiting valve pressure of 20 cm H(2)O. Success rates were evaluated between groups. RESULTS: Effective BMV was possible in 91 (91%), 64 (64%) and 41 (41%) patients in groups G, D and C respectively. The differences were statistically significant. Successful BMV rate was significantly higher in female patients in group G compared to group C; 43/44 versus 25/46 individuals, P = 0.0001, odds ratio = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (0.00, 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Leaving dentures in place in edentulous patients after inducing anesthesia improves bag-mask ventilation. However, placing folded compressed gauze in buccal space leads to more significant improvement in BMV compared to leaving dentures in place. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4018598/ /pubmed/24829737 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Preventive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Golzari, Samad EJ Soleimanpour, Hassan Mehryar, Hamidreza Salarilak, Shaker Mahmoodpoor, Ata Panahi, Jafar Rahimi Afhami, Mohammadreza Sabahi, Majid Hassani, Zahra Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title | Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title_full | Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title_short | Comparison of Three Methods in Improving Bag Mask Ventilation |
title_sort | comparison of three methods in improving bag mask ventilation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golzarisamadej comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT soleimanpourhassan comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT mehryarhamidreza comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT salarilakshaker comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT mahmoodpoorata comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT panahijafarrahimi comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT afhamimohammadreza comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT sabahimajid comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation AT hassanizahra comparisonofthreemethodsinimprovingbagmaskventilation |