Cargando…

Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these question...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voigt, Karen, Taché, Stephanie, Klement, Andreas, Fankhaenel, Thomas, Bojanowski, Stefan, Bergmann, Antje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-87
_version_ 1782480132080926720
author Voigt, Karen
Taché, Stephanie
Klement, Andreas
Fankhaenel, Thomas
Bojanowski, Stefan
Bergmann, Antje
author_facet Voigt, Karen
Taché, Stephanie
Klement, Andreas
Fankhaenel, Thomas
Bojanowski, Stefan
Bergmann, Antje
author_sort Voigt, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. RESULTS: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4018962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40189622014-05-14 Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study Voigt, Karen Taché, Stephanie Klement, Andreas Fankhaenel, Thomas Bojanowski, Stefan Bergmann, Antje BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. RESULTS: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent. BioMed Central 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4018962/ /pubmed/24884460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-87 Text en Copyright © 2014 Voigt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voigt, Karen
Taché, Stephanie
Klement, Andreas
Fankhaenel, Thomas
Bojanowski, Stefan
Bergmann, Antje
Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title_full Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title_fullStr Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title_short Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
title_sort gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-87
work_keys_str_mv AT voigtkaren gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy
AT tachestephanie gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy
AT klementandreas gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy
AT fankhaenelthomas gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy
AT bojanowskistefan gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy
AT bergmannantje gaininginformationabouthomevisitsinprimarycaremethodologicalissuesfromafeasibilitystudy