Cargando…

Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors

BACKGROUND: Assessment of hand kinematics is important when evaluating hand functioning. Major drawbacks of current sensing glove systems are lack of rotational observability in particular directions, labour intensive calibration methods which are sensitive to wear and lack of an absolute hand orien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kortier, Henk G, Sluiter, Victor I, Roetenberg, Daniel, Veltink, Peter H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24746123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-70
_version_ 1782480163894722560
author Kortier, Henk G
Sluiter, Victor I
Roetenberg, Daniel
Veltink, Peter H
author_facet Kortier, Henk G
Sluiter, Victor I
Roetenberg, Daniel
Veltink, Peter H
author_sort Kortier, Henk G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of hand kinematics is important when evaluating hand functioning. Major drawbacks of current sensing glove systems are lack of rotational observability in particular directions, labour intensive calibration methods which are sensitive to wear and lack of an absolute hand orientation estimate. METHODS: We propose an ambulatory system using inertial sensors that can be placed on the hand, fingers and thumb. It allows a full 3D reconstruction of all finger and thumb joints as well as the absolute orientation of the hand. The system was experimentally evaluated for the static accuracy, dynamic range and repeatability. RESULTS: The RMS position norm difference of the fingertip compared to an optical system was 5±0.5 mm (mean ± standard deviation) for flexion-extension and 12.4±3.0 mm for combined flexion-extension abduction-adduction movements of the index finger. The difference between index and thumb tips during a pinching movement was 6.5±2.1 mm. The dynamic range of the sensing system and filter was adequate to reconstruct full 80 degrees movements of the index finger performed at 116 times per minute, which was limited by the range of the gyroscope. Finally, the reliability study showed a mean range difference over five subjects of 1.1±0.4 degrees for a flat hand test and 1.8±0.6 degrees for a plastic mold clenching test, which is smaller than other reported data gloves. CONCLUSION: Compared to existing data gloves, this research showed that inertial and magnetic sensors are of interest for ambulatory analysis of the human hand and finger kinematics in terms of static accuracy, dynamic range and repeatability. It allows for estimation of multi-degree of freedom joint movements using low-cost sensors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4019393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40193932014-05-27 Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors Kortier, Henk G Sluiter, Victor I Roetenberg, Daniel Veltink, Peter H J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Assessment of hand kinematics is important when evaluating hand functioning. Major drawbacks of current sensing glove systems are lack of rotational observability in particular directions, labour intensive calibration methods which are sensitive to wear and lack of an absolute hand orientation estimate. METHODS: We propose an ambulatory system using inertial sensors that can be placed on the hand, fingers and thumb. It allows a full 3D reconstruction of all finger and thumb joints as well as the absolute orientation of the hand. The system was experimentally evaluated for the static accuracy, dynamic range and repeatability. RESULTS: The RMS position norm difference of the fingertip compared to an optical system was 5±0.5 mm (mean ± standard deviation) for flexion-extension and 12.4±3.0 mm for combined flexion-extension abduction-adduction movements of the index finger. The difference between index and thumb tips during a pinching movement was 6.5±2.1 mm. The dynamic range of the sensing system and filter was adequate to reconstruct full 80 degrees movements of the index finger performed at 116 times per minute, which was limited by the range of the gyroscope. Finally, the reliability study showed a mean range difference over five subjects of 1.1±0.4 degrees for a flat hand test and 1.8±0.6 degrees for a plastic mold clenching test, which is smaller than other reported data gloves. CONCLUSION: Compared to existing data gloves, this research showed that inertial and magnetic sensors are of interest for ambulatory analysis of the human hand and finger kinematics in terms of static accuracy, dynamic range and repeatability. It allows for estimation of multi-degree of freedom joint movements using low-cost sensors. BioMed Central 2014-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4019393/ /pubmed/24746123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-70 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kortier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Kortier, Henk G
Sluiter, Victor I
Roetenberg, Daniel
Veltink, Peter H
Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title_full Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title_fullStr Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title_short Assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
title_sort assessment of hand kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24746123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-70
work_keys_str_mv AT kortierhenkg assessmentofhandkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensors
AT sluitervictori assessmentofhandkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensors
AT roetenbergdaniel assessmentofhandkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensors
AT veltinkpeterh assessmentofhandkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensors