Cargando…

A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts

Although neural activity often reflects the processing of external inputs, intrinsic fluctuations in activity have been observed throughout the brain. These may relate to patterns of self-generated thought that can occur while not performing goal-driven tasks. To understand the relationship between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J., Lurie, Dan, Urchs, Sebastian, Kipping, Judy A., Craddock, R. Cameron, Milham, Michael P., Margulies, Daniel S., Smallwood, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24824880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097176
_version_ 1782480187045183488
author Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
Lurie, Dan
Urchs, Sebastian
Kipping, Judy A.
Craddock, R. Cameron
Milham, Michael P.
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
author_facet Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
Lurie, Dan
Urchs, Sebastian
Kipping, Judy A.
Craddock, R. Cameron
Milham, Michael P.
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
author_sort Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
collection PubMed
description Although neural activity often reflects the processing of external inputs, intrinsic fluctuations in activity have been observed throughout the brain. These may relate to patterns of self-generated thought that can occur while not performing goal-driven tasks. To understand the relationship between self-generated mental activity and intrinsic neural fluctuations, we developed the New York Cognition Questionnaire (NYC-Q) to assess the content and form of an individual's experiences during the acquisition of resting-state fMRI data. The data were collected as a part of the Nathan Kline Rockland Enhanced sample. We decomposed NYC-Q scores using exploratory factor analysis and found that self-reported thoughts clustered into distinct dimensions of content (future related, past related, positive, negative, and social) and form (words, images, and specificity). We used these components to perform an individual difference analysis exploring how differences in the types of self-generated thoughts relate to whole brain measures of intrinsic brain activity (fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, regional homogeneity, and degree centrality). We found patterns of self-generated thoughts related to changes that were distributed across a wide range of cortical areas. For example, individuals who reported greater imagery exhibited greater low frequency fluctuations in a region of perigenual cingulate cortex, a region that is known to participate in the so-called default-mode network. We also found certain forms of thought were associated with other areas, such as primary visual cortex, the insula, and the cerebellum. For example, individuals who reported greater future thought exhibited less homogeneous neural fluctuations in a region of lateral occipital cortex, a result that is consistent with the claim that particular types of self-generated thought depend on processes that are decoupled from sensory processes. These data provide evidence that self-generated thought is a heterogeneous category of experience and that studying its content can be helpful in understanding brain dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4019564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40195642014-05-16 A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J. Lurie, Dan Urchs, Sebastian Kipping, Judy A. Craddock, R. Cameron Milham, Michael P. Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan PLoS One Research Article Although neural activity often reflects the processing of external inputs, intrinsic fluctuations in activity have been observed throughout the brain. These may relate to patterns of self-generated thought that can occur while not performing goal-driven tasks. To understand the relationship between self-generated mental activity and intrinsic neural fluctuations, we developed the New York Cognition Questionnaire (NYC-Q) to assess the content and form of an individual's experiences during the acquisition of resting-state fMRI data. The data were collected as a part of the Nathan Kline Rockland Enhanced sample. We decomposed NYC-Q scores using exploratory factor analysis and found that self-reported thoughts clustered into distinct dimensions of content (future related, past related, positive, negative, and social) and form (words, images, and specificity). We used these components to perform an individual difference analysis exploring how differences in the types of self-generated thoughts relate to whole brain measures of intrinsic brain activity (fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, regional homogeneity, and degree centrality). We found patterns of self-generated thoughts related to changes that were distributed across a wide range of cortical areas. For example, individuals who reported greater imagery exhibited greater low frequency fluctuations in a region of perigenual cingulate cortex, a region that is known to participate in the so-called default-mode network. We also found certain forms of thought were associated with other areas, such as primary visual cortex, the insula, and the cerebellum. For example, individuals who reported greater future thought exhibited less homogeneous neural fluctuations in a region of lateral occipital cortex, a result that is consistent with the claim that particular types of self-generated thought depend on processes that are decoupled from sensory processes. These data provide evidence that self-generated thought is a heterogeneous category of experience and that studying its content can be helpful in understanding brain dynamics. Public Library of Science 2014-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4019564/ /pubmed/24824880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097176 Text en © 2014 Gorgolewski et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
Lurie, Dan
Urchs, Sebastian
Kipping, Judy A.
Craddock, R. Cameron
Milham, Michael P.
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title_full A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title_fullStr A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title_full_unstemmed A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title_short A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts
title_sort correspondence between individual differences in the brain's intrinsic functional architecture and the content and form of self-generated thoughts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24824880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097176
work_keys_str_mv AT gorgolewskikrzysztofj acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT luriedan acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT urchssebastian acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT kippingjudya acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT craddockrcameron acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT milhammichaelp acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT marguliesdaniels acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT smallwoodjonathan acorrespondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT gorgolewskikrzysztofj correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT luriedan correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT urchssebastian correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT kippingjudya correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT craddockrcameron correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT milhammichaelp correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT marguliesdaniels correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts
AT smallwoodjonathan correspondencebetweenindividualdifferencesinthebrainsintrinsicfunctionalarchitectureandthecontentandformofselfgeneratedthoughts