Cargando…

Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

The 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most widely used smell test in the world. Presently, culturally modified versions of this test are available in multiple languages. A traditional Chinese version of the UPSIT (UPSIT-TC) has been developed for administrat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Rong-San, Kuo, Li-Te, Wu, Shang-Heng, Su, Mao-Chang, Liang, Kai-Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199144
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2014.5.0084
_version_ 1782480210255413248
author Jiang, Rong-San
Kuo, Li-Te
Wu, Shang-Heng
Su, Mao-Chang
Liang, Kai-Li
author_facet Jiang, Rong-San
Kuo, Li-Te
Wu, Shang-Heng
Su, Mao-Chang
Liang, Kai-Li
author_sort Jiang, Rong-San
collection PubMed
description The 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most widely used smell test in the world. Presently, culturally modified versions of this test are available in multiple languages. A traditional Chinese version of the UPSIT (UPSIT-TC) has been developed for administration in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the UPSIT-TC in Taiwanese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The phenylethyl alcohol (PEA) odor detection threshold test, the North American version of UPSIT (UPSIT-NA), and the UPSIT-TC were administered to 40 healthy subjects and to 100 CRS patients before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The UPSIT-TC showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.887, 0.886, and 0.870 at three test occasions) and test–retest reliability (p < 0.001). The scores of UPSIT-TC were significantly correlated to the PEA thresholds (p < 0.001). The UPSIT-TC scores were significantly higher than those of the UPSIT-NA (p = 0.028) when analysis was performed with logistic regression with independent variables including test occasions (before or after FESS), test methods (UPSIT-NA or UPSIT-TC), status of polyp (with or without), and PEA thresholds (improved or did not improve). In addition, there were significant between-group differences in UPSIT-TC scores including healthy versus CRS, CRS with polyps versus CRS without polyps, and PEA thresholds improved versus PEA thresholds which did not improve. The UPSIT-TC is reliable and valid for measuring olfactory function in Taiwanese patients with rhinosinusitis. In addition, the UPSIT-TC clearly resulted in better performance than that of UPSIT-NA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4019742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher OceanSide Publications, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40197422014-05-20 Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis Jiang, Rong-San Kuo, Li-Te Wu, Shang-Heng Su, Mao-Chang Liang, Kai-Li Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Articles The 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most widely used smell test in the world. Presently, culturally modified versions of this test are available in multiple languages. A traditional Chinese version of the UPSIT (UPSIT-TC) has been developed for administration in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the UPSIT-TC in Taiwanese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The phenylethyl alcohol (PEA) odor detection threshold test, the North American version of UPSIT (UPSIT-NA), and the UPSIT-TC were administered to 40 healthy subjects and to 100 CRS patients before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The UPSIT-TC showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.887, 0.886, and 0.870 at three test occasions) and test–retest reliability (p < 0.001). The scores of UPSIT-TC were significantly correlated to the PEA thresholds (p < 0.001). The UPSIT-TC scores were significantly higher than those of the UPSIT-NA (p = 0.028) when analysis was performed with logistic regression with independent variables including test occasions (before or after FESS), test methods (UPSIT-NA or UPSIT-TC), status of polyp (with or without), and PEA thresholds (improved or did not improve). In addition, there were significant between-group differences in UPSIT-TC scores including healthy versus CRS, CRS with polyps versus CRS without polyps, and PEA thresholds improved versus PEA thresholds which did not improve. The UPSIT-TC is reliable and valid for measuring olfactory function in Taiwanese patients with rhinosinusitis. In addition, the UPSIT-TC clearly resulted in better performance than that of UPSIT-NA. OceanSide Publications, Inc. 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4019742/ /pubmed/25199144 http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2014.5.0084 Text en Copyright © 2014, OceanSide Publications, Inc., U.S.A. This publication is provided under the terms of the Creative Commons Public License ("CCPL" or "License"), in attribution 3.0 unported (Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)), further described at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. The work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other then as authorized under this license or copyright law is prohibited.
spellingShingle Articles
Jiang, Rong-San
Kuo, Li-Te
Wu, Shang-Heng
Su, Mao-Chang
Liang, Kai-Li
Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title_full Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title_fullStr Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title_short Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
title_sort validation of the applicability of the traditional chinese version of the university of pennsylvania smell identification test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199144
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ar.2014.5.0084
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangrongsan validationoftheapplicabilityofthetraditionalchineseversionoftheuniversityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationtestinpatientswithchronicrhinosinusitis
AT kuolite validationoftheapplicabilityofthetraditionalchineseversionoftheuniversityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationtestinpatientswithchronicrhinosinusitis
AT wushangheng validationoftheapplicabilityofthetraditionalchineseversionoftheuniversityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationtestinpatientswithchronicrhinosinusitis
AT sumaochang validationoftheapplicabilityofthetraditionalchineseversionoftheuniversityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationtestinpatientswithchronicrhinosinusitis
AT liangkaili validationoftheapplicabilityofthetraditionalchineseversionoftheuniversityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationtestinpatientswithchronicrhinosinusitis