Cargando…

A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery

BACKGROUND: Water immersion during the first stage of labor can reduce the length of the first stage and epidural/spinal analgesia use; however, there is limited information regarding other outcomes. Our purpose was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who underwent water immersion dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yinglin, Liu, Yukun, Huang, Xiuzhi, Du, Chuying, Peng, Jing, Huang, Peixian, Zhang, Jianping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-160
_version_ 1782480213905506304
author Liu, Yinglin
Liu, Yukun
Huang, Xiuzhi
Du, Chuying
Peng, Jing
Huang, Peixian
Zhang, Jianping
author_facet Liu, Yinglin
Liu, Yukun
Huang, Xiuzhi
Du, Chuying
Peng, Jing
Huang, Peixian
Zhang, Jianping
author_sort Liu, Yinglin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Water immersion during the first stage of labor can reduce the length of the first stage and epidural/spinal analgesia use; however, there is limited information regarding other outcomes. Our purpose was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who underwent water immersion during the first stage of labor with those who underwent conventional labor and delivery. METHODS: Healthy primipara with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation were included in the study. Patients were allowed to choose water immersion during labor or conventional labor and delivery. For water immersion, the water temperature was maintained at 35-38°C and subjects left the tub on complete cervical dilatation. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain during labor. Other outcome measures included duration of labor, type of delivery, blood loss, pelvic floor dysfunction and symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 42 days after delivery, infant Apgar scores, and need for transfer of the infant to the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Thirty eight subjects (mean age, 28.66 ± 3.08 y) received water immersion and 70 (mean age, 27.89 ± 2.99 y) underwent conventional labor and delivery. There were no differences in maternal height, weight, age, gestational age, gravidity, and newborn weight between the groups (all, p>0.05). VAS pain scores were significantly greater in the conventional labor group at 30 min and 60 min after a cervical dilatation of 3 cm (30 min: 10 [9, 10] vs. 6 [5, 8]; 60 min: 10 [10, 10] vs. 7 [6, 8], respectively, both, p<0.001). The duration of labor and postpartum bleeding were similar between the groups (all, p>0.05). The cesarean section rate was higher in the conventional labor group (32.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.026). The 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores were similar between the groups. Maternal and neonatal culture results were similar between the groups. SUI symptoms at 42 days after delivery was significantly higher in the conventional labor group (25.5% vs. 6.1%, respectively, p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Water immersion can reduce labor pain, and is associated with a lower rate of cesarean delivery and SUI symptoms at 42 days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4019783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40197832014-05-15 A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery Liu, Yinglin Liu, Yukun Huang, Xiuzhi Du, Chuying Peng, Jing Huang, Peixian Zhang, Jianping BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Water immersion during the first stage of labor can reduce the length of the first stage and epidural/spinal analgesia use; however, there is limited information regarding other outcomes. Our purpose was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who underwent water immersion during the first stage of labor with those who underwent conventional labor and delivery. METHODS: Healthy primipara with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation were included in the study. Patients were allowed to choose water immersion during labor or conventional labor and delivery. For water immersion, the water temperature was maintained at 35-38°C and subjects left the tub on complete cervical dilatation. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain during labor. Other outcome measures included duration of labor, type of delivery, blood loss, pelvic floor dysfunction and symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 42 days after delivery, infant Apgar scores, and need for transfer of the infant to the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Thirty eight subjects (mean age, 28.66 ± 3.08 y) received water immersion and 70 (mean age, 27.89 ± 2.99 y) underwent conventional labor and delivery. There were no differences in maternal height, weight, age, gestational age, gravidity, and newborn weight between the groups (all, p>0.05). VAS pain scores were significantly greater in the conventional labor group at 30 min and 60 min after a cervical dilatation of 3 cm (30 min: 10 [9, 10] vs. 6 [5, 8]; 60 min: 10 [10, 10] vs. 7 [6, 8], respectively, both, p<0.001). The duration of labor and postpartum bleeding were similar between the groups (all, p>0.05). The cesarean section rate was higher in the conventional labor group (32.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.026). The 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores were similar between the groups. Maternal and neonatal culture results were similar between the groups. SUI symptoms at 42 days after delivery was significantly higher in the conventional labor group (25.5% vs. 6.1%, respectively, p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Water immersion can reduce labor pain, and is associated with a lower rate of cesarean delivery and SUI symptoms at 42 days. BioMed Central 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4019783/ /pubmed/24886438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-160 Text en Copyright © 2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Yinglin
Liu, Yukun
Huang, Xiuzhi
Du, Chuying
Peng, Jing
Huang, Peixian
Zhang, Jianping
A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title_full A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title_fullStr A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title_short A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
title_sort comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-160
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyinglin acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT liuyukun acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT huangxiuzhi acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT duchuying acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT pengjing acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT huangpeixian acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT zhangjianping acomparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT liuyinglin comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT liuyukun comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT huangxiuzhi comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT duchuying comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT pengjing comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT huangpeixian comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery
AT zhangjianping comparisonofmaternalandneonataloutcomesbetweenwaterimmersionduringlaborandconventionallaboranddelivery