Cargando…

A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geynisman, Daniel M, Zha, Yuanyuan, Kunnavakkam, Rangesh, Aklilu, Mebea, Catenacci, Daniel VT, Polite, Blase N, Rosenbaum, Cara, Namakydoust, Azadeh, Karrison, Theodore, Gajewski, Thomas F, Kindler, Hedy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8
_version_ 1782480231473348608
author Geynisman, Daniel M
Zha, Yuanyuan
Kunnavakkam, Rangesh
Aklilu, Mebea
Catenacci, Daniel VT
Polite, Blase N
Rosenbaum, Cara
Namakydoust, Azadeh
Karrison, Theodore
Gajewski, Thomas F
Kindler, Hedy L
author_facet Geynisman, Daniel M
Zha, Yuanyuan
Kunnavakkam, Rangesh
Aklilu, Mebea
Catenacci, Daniel VT
Polite, Blase N
Rosenbaum, Cara
Namakydoust, Azadeh
Karrison, Theodore
Gajewski, Thomas F
Kindler, Hedy L
author_sort Geynisman, Daniel M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determine the peptide dose required to induce an optimal CD8(+) T cell response. METHODS: Patients with a PS 0-1, HLA-A2+ and CEA-expressing, previously-treated PC were randomized to receive 10 μg (arm A), 100 μg (arm B) or 1000 μg (arm C) of CEA peptide emulsified in Montanide and GM-CSF, given every 2 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were screened and 19 enrolled of whom 14 received at least 3 doses of the vaccine and thus evaluated for the primary immunologic endpoint. A median of 4 cycles (range 1-81) was delivered. Median and mean peak IFN-γ T cell response by ELISPOT (spots per 10(4) CD8(+) cells, Arm A/B/C) was 11/52/271 (A vs. C, p = 0.028) for medians and 37/148/248 (A vs. C, p = 0.032) for means. T cell responses developed or increased in 20%/60%/100% of pts in Arms A/B/C. Seven of the 19 patients remain alive at a minimum 32 months from trial initiation, including three with unresectable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The T cell response in this randomized phase I trial was dose-dependent with the 1 mg CEA peptide dose eliciting the most robust T cell responses. A signal of clinical benefit was observed and no significant toxicity was noted. Further evaluation of 1 mg CEA peptide with stronger adjuvants, and/or combined with agents to overcome immune inhibitory pathways, may be warranted in PC pts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00203892
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4019890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40198902014-05-15 A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma Geynisman, Daniel M Zha, Yuanyuan Kunnavakkam, Rangesh Aklilu, Mebea Catenacci, Daniel VT Polite, Blase N Rosenbaum, Cara Namakydoust, Azadeh Karrison, Theodore Gajewski, Thomas F Kindler, Hedy L J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determine the peptide dose required to induce an optimal CD8(+) T cell response. METHODS: Patients with a PS 0-1, HLA-A2+ and CEA-expressing, previously-treated PC were randomized to receive 10 μg (arm A), 100 μg (arm B) or 1000 μg (arm C) of CEA peptide emulsified in Montanide and GM-CSF, given every 2 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were screened and 19 enrolled of whom 14 received at least 3 doses of the vaccine and thus evaluated for the primary immunologic endpoint. A median of 4 cycles (range 1-81) was delivered. Median and mean peak IFN-γ T cell response by ELISPOT (spots per 10(4) CD8(+) cells, Arm A/B/C) was 11/52/271 (A vs. C, p = 0.028) for medians and 37/148/248 (A vs. C, p = 0.032) for means. T cell responses developed or increased in 20%/60%/100% of pts in Arms A/B/C. Seven of the 19 patients remain alive at a minimum 32 months from trial initiation, including three with unresectable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The T cell response in this randomized phase I trial was dose-dependent with the 1 mg CEA peptide dose eliciting the most robust T cell responses. A signal of clinical benefit was observed and no significant toxicity was noted. Further evaluation of 1 mg CEA peptide with stronger adjuvants, and/or combined with agents to overcome immune inhibitory pathways, may be warranted in PC pts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00203892 BioMed Central 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4019890/ /pubmed/24829746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Geynisman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Geynisman, Daniel M
Zha, Yuanyuan
Kunnavakkam, Rangesh
Aklilu, Mebea
Catenacci, Daniel VT
Polite, Blase N
Rosenbaum, Cara
Namakydoust, Azadeh
Karrison, Theodore
Gajewski, Thomas F
Kindler, Hedy L
A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title_full A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title_short A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
title_sort randomized pilot phase i study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (cea) peptide (cap1-6d)/montanide/gm-csf-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8
work_keys_str_mv AT geynismandanielm arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT zhayuanyuan arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT kunnavakkamrangesh arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT aklilumebea arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT catenaccidanielvt arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT politeblasen arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT rosenbaumcara arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT namakydoustazadeh arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT karrisontheodore arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT gajewskithomasf arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT kindlerhedyl arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT geynismandanielm randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT zhayuanyuan randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT kunnavakkamrangesh randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT aklilumebea randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT catenaccidanielvt randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT politeblasen randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT rosenbaumcara randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT namakydoustazadeh randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT karrisontheodore randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT gajewskithomasf randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma
AT kindlerhedyl randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma