Cargando…
A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8 |
_version_ | 1782480231473348608 |
---|---|
author | Geynisman, Daniel M Zha, Yuanyuan Kunnavakkam, Rangesh Aklilu, Mebea Catenacci, Daniel VT Polite, Blase N Rosenbaum, Cara Namakydoust, Azadeh Karrison, Theodore Gajewski, Thomas F Kindler, Hedy L |
author_facet | Geynisman, Daniel M Zha, Yuanyuan Kunnavakkam, Rangesh Aklilu, Mebea Catenacci, Daniel VT Polite, Blase N Rosenbaum, Cara Namakydoust, Azadeh Karrison, Theodore Gajewski, Thomas F Kindler, Hedy L |
author_sort | Geynisman, Daniel M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determine the peptide dose required to induce an optimal CD8(+) T cell response. METHODS: Patients with a PS 0-1, HLA-A2+ and CEA-expressing, previously-treated PC were randomized to receive 10 μg (arm A), 100 μg (arm B) or 1000 μg (arm C) of CEA peptide emulsified in Montanide and GM-CSF, given every 2 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were screened and 19 enrolled of whom 14 received at least 3 doses of the vaccine and thus evaluated for the primary immunologic endpoint. A median of 4 cycles (range 1-81) was delivered. Median and mean peak IFN-γ T cell response by ELISPOT (spots per 10(4) CD8(+) cells, Arm A/B/C) was 11/52/271 (A vs. C, p = 0.028) for medians and 37/148/248 (A vs. C, p = 0.032) for means. T cell responses developed or increased in 20%/60%/100% of pts in Arms A/B/C. Seven of the 19 patients remain alive at a minimum 32 months from trial initiation, including three with unresectable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The T cell response in this randomized phase I trial was dose-dependent with the 1 mg CEA peptide dose eliciting the most robust T cell responses. A signal of clinical benefit was observed and no significant toxicity was noted. Further evaluation of 1 mg CEA peptide with stronger adjuvants, and/or combined with agents to overcome immune inhibitory pathways, may be warranted in PC pts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00203892 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4019890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40198902014-05-15 A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma Geynisman, Daniel M Zha, Yuanyuan Kunnavakkam, Rangesh Aklilu, Mebea Catenacci, Daniel VT Polite, Blase N Rosenbaum, Cara Namakydoust, Azadeh Karrison, Theodore Gajewski, Thomas F Kindler, Hedy L J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: CEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determine the peptide dose required to induce an optimal CD8(+) T cell response. METHODS: Patients with a PS 0-1, HLA-A2+ and CEA-expressing, previously-treated PC were randomized to receive 10 μg (arm A), 100 μg (arm B) or 1000 μg (arm C) of CEA peptide emulsified in Montanide and GM-CSF, given every 2 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were screened and 19 enrolled of whom 14 received at least 3 doses of the vaccine and thus evaluated for the primary immunologic endpoint. A median of 4 cycles (range 1-81) was delivered. Median and mean peak IFN-γ T cell response by ELISPOT (spots per 10(4) CD8(+) cells, Arm A/B/C) was 11/52/271 (A vs. C, p = 0.028) for medians and 37/148/248 (A vs. C, p = 0.032) for means. T cell responses developed or increased in 20%/60%/100% of pts in Arms A/B/C. Seven of the 19 patients remain alive at a minimum 32 months from trial initiation, including three with unresectable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The T cell response in this randomized phase I trial was dose-dependent with the 1 mg CEA peptide dose eliciting the most robust T cell responses. A signal of clinical benefit was observed and no significant toxicity was noted. Further evaluation of 1 mg CEA peptide with stronger adjuvants, and/or combined with agents to overcome immune inhibitory pathways, may be warranted in PC pts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00203892 BioMed Central 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4019890/ /pubmed/24829746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Geynisman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Geynisman, Daniel M Zha, Yuanyuan Kunnavakkam, Rangesh Aklilu, Mebea Catenacci, Daniel VT Polite, Blase N Rosenbaum, Cara Namakydoust, Azadeh Karrison, Theodore Gajewski, Thomas F Kindler, Hedy L A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title | A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_full | A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_short | A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | randomized pilot phase i study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (cea) peptide (cap1-6d)/montanide/gm-csf-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-1-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geynismandanielm arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT zhayuanyuan arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT kunnavakkamrangesh arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT aklilumebea arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT catenaccidanielvt arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT politeblasen arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT rosenbaumcara arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT namakydoustazadeh arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT karrisontheodore arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT gajewskithomasf arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT kindlerhedyl arandomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT geynismandanielm randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT zhayuanyuan randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT kunnavakkamrangesh randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT aklilumebea randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT catenaccidanielvt randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT politeblasen randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT rosenbaumcara randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT namakydoustazadeh randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT karrisontheodore randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT gajewskithomasf randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma AT kindlerhedyl randomizedpilotphaseistudyofmodifiedcarcinoembryonicantigenceapeptidecap16dmontanidegmcsfvaccineinpatientswithpancreaticadenocarcinoma |