Cargando…

Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence

Sphincteroplasty (SP) is the operation most frequently performed in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe anal incontinence (AI) who do not respond to conservative treatment. Other costly surgeries, such as artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) and electro-stimulated graciloplasty, have been more or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo, Pescatori, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24759337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou003
_version_ 1782316019090456576
author Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo
Pescatori, Mario
author_facet Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo
Pescatori, Mario
author_sort Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo
collection PubMed
description Sphincteroplasty (SP) is the operation most frequently performed in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe anal incontinence (AI) who do not respond to conservative treatment. Other costly surgeries, such as artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) and electro-stimulated graciloplasty, have been more or less abandoned due to their high morbidity rate. Minimally invasive procedures are widely used, such as sacral neuromodulation and injection of bulking agents, but both are costly and the latter may cure only mild incontinence. The early outcome of SP is usually good if the sphincters are not markedly denervated, but its effect diminishes over time. SP is more often performed for post-traumatic than for idiopathic AI. It may also be associated to the Altemeier procedure, aimed at reducing the recurrence rate of rectal prolapse, and may be useful when AI is due either to injury to the sphincter, or to a narrowed rectum following the procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). The outcome of SP is likely to be improved with biological meshes and post-operative pelvic floor rehabilitation. SP is more effective in males than in multiparous women, whose sphincters are often denervated, and its post-operative morbidity is low. In conclusion, SP, being both low-cost and safe, remains a good option in the treatment of selected patients with AI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4020132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40201322014-05-14 Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Mario Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Reviews Sphincteroplasty (SP) is the operation most frequently performed in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe anal incontinence (AI) who do not respond to conservative treatment. Other costly surgeries, such as artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) and electro-stimulated graciloplasty, have been more or less abandoned due to their high morbidity rate. Minimally invasive procedures are widely used, such as sacral neuromodulation and injection of bulking agents, but both are costly and the latter may cure only mild incontinence. The early outcome of SP is usually good if the sphincters are not markedly denervated, but its effect diminishes over time. SP is more often performed for post-traumatic than for idiopathic AI. It may also be associated to the Altemeier procedure, aimed at reducing the recurrence rate of rectal prolapse, and may be useful when AI is due either to injury to the sphincter, or to a narrowed rectum following the procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). The outcome of SP is likely to be improved with biological meshes and post-operative pelvic floor rehabilitation. SP is more effective in males than in multiparous women, whose sphincters are often denervated, and its post-operative morbidity is low. In conclusion, SP, being both low-cost and safe, remains a good option in the treatment of selected patients with AI. Oxford University Press 2014-05 2014-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4020132/ /pubmed/24759337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou003 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Pescatori, Lorenzo Carlo
Pescatori, Mario
Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title_full Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title_fullStr Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title_short Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
title_sort sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24759337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou003
work_keys_str_mv AT pescatorilorenzocarlo sphincteroplastyforanalincontinence
AT pescatorimario sphincteroplastyforanalincontinence