Cargando…
MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Around 150,000 people each year attend hospitals in England due to self-harm, many of them more than once. Over 5,000 people die by suicide each year in the UK, a quarter of them having attended hospital in the previous year because of self-harm. Self-harm is a major identifiable risk fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-163 |
_version_ | 1782316060815392768 |
---|---|
author | Collinson, Michelle Owens, David Blenkiron, Paul Burton, Kayleigh Graham, Liz Hatcher, Simon House, Allan Martin, Katie Pembroke, Louise Protheroe, David Tubeuf, Sandy Farrin, Amanda |
author_facet | Collinson, Michelle Owens, David Blenkiron, Paul Burton, Kayleigh Graham, Liz Hatcher, Simon House, Allan Martin, Katie Pembroke, Louise Protheroe, David Tubeuf, Sandy Farrin, Amanda |
author_sort | Collinson, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Around 150,000 people each year attend hospitals in England due to self-harm, many of them more than once. Over 5,000 people die by suicide each year in the UK, a quarter of them having attended hospital in the previous year because of self-harm. Self-harm is a major identifiable risk factor for suicide. People receive variable care at hospital; many are not assessed for their psychological needs and little psychological therapy is offered. Despite its frequent occurrence, we have no clear research evidence about how to reduce the repetition of self-harm. Some people who have self-harmed show less active ways of solving problems, and brief problem-solving therapies are considered the most promising psychological treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a pragmatic, individually randomised, controlled, feasibility study comparing interpersonal problem-solving therapy plus treatment-as-usual with treatment-as-usual alone, for adults attending a general hospital following self-harm. A total of 60 participants will be randomised equally between the treatment arms, which will be balanced with respect to the type of most recent self-harm event, number of previous self-harm events, gender and age. Feasibility objectives are as follows: a) To establish and field test procedures for implementing the problem-solving intervention; b) To determine the feasibility and best method of participant recruitment and follow up; c) To assess therapeutic delivery; d) To assess the feasibility of obtaining the definitive trial’s primary and secondary outcomes; e) To assess the perceived burden and acceptability of obtaining the trial’s self-reported outcome data; f) To inform the sample size calculation for the definitive trial. DISCUSSION: The results of this feasibility study will be used to determine the appropriateness of proceeding to a definitive trial and will allow us to design an achievable trial of interpersonal problem-solving therapy for adults who self-harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN54036115) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4020387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40203872014-05-15 MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study Collinson, Michelle Owens, David Blenkiron, Paul Burton, Kayleigh Graham, Liz Hatcher, Simon House, Allan Martin, Katie Pembroke, Louise Protheroe, David Tubeuf, Sandy Farrin, Amanda Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Around 150,000 people each year attend hospitals in England due to self-harm, many of them more than once. Over 5,000 people die by suicide each year in the UK, a quarter of them having attended hospital in the previous year because of self-harm. Self-harm is a major identifiable risk factor for suicide. People receive variable care at hospital; many are not assessed for their psychological needs and little psychological therapy is offered. Despite its frequent occurrence, we have no clear research evidence about how to reduce the repetition of self-harm. Some people who have self-harmed show less active ways of solving problems, and brief problem-solving therapies are considered the most promising psychological treatments. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a pragmatic, individually randomised, controlled, feasibility study comparing interpersonal problem-solving therapy plus treatment-as-usual with treatment-as-usual alone, for adults attending a general hospital following self-harm. A total of 60 participants will be randomised equally between the treatment arms, which will be balanced with respect to the type of most recent self-harm event, number of previous self-harm events, gender and age. Feasibility objectives are as follows: a) To establish and field test procedures for implementing the problem-solving intervention; b) To determine the feasibility and best method of participant recruitment and follow up; c) To assess therapeutic delivery; d) To assess the feasibility of obtaining the definitive trial’s primary and secondary outcomes; e) To assess the perceived burden and acceptability of obtaining the trial’s self-reported outcome data; f) To inform the sample size calculation for the definitive trial. DISCUSSION: The results of this feasibility study will be used to determine the appropriateness of proceeding to a definitive trial and will allow us to design an achievable trial of interpersonal problem-solving therapy for adults who self-harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN54036115) BioMed Central 2014-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4020387/ /pubmed/24886683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-163 Text en Copyright © 2014 Collinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Collinson, Michelle Owens, David Blenkiron, Paul Burton, Kayleigh Graham, Liz Hatcher, Simon House, Allan Martin, Katie Pembroke, Louise Protheroe, David Tubeuf, Sandy Farrin, Amanda MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title | MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title_full | MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title_fullStr | MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title_short | MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
title_sort | midships: multicentre intervention designed for self-harm using interpersonal problem-solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collinsonmichelle midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT owensdavid midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT blenkironpaul midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT burtonkayleigh midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT grahamliz midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT hatchersimon midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT houseallan midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT martinkatie midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT pembrokelouise midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT protheroedavid midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT tubeufsandy midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy AT farrinamanda midshipsmulticentreinterventiondesignedforselfharmusinginterpersonalproblemsolvingprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy |