Cargando…

Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver

The current gold-standard method for cancer safety assessment of drugs is a rodent two-year bioassay, which is associated with significant costs and requires testing a high number of animals over lifetime. Due to the absence of a comprehensive set of short-term assays predicting carcinogenicity, new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichner, Johannes, Wrzodek, Clemens, Römer, Michael, Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Heidrun, Zell, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097678
_version_ 1782316136572911616
author Eichner, Johannes
Wrzodek, Clemens
Römer, Michael
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Heidrun
Zell, Andreas
author_facet Eichner, Johannes
Wrzodek, Clemens
Römer, Michael
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Heidrun
Zell, Andreas
author_sort Eichner, Johannes
collection PubMed
description The current gold-standard method for cancer safety assessment of drugs is a rodent two-year bioassay, which is associated with significant costs and requires testing a high number of animals over lifetime. Due to the absence of a comprehensive set of short-term assays predicting carcinogenicity, new approaches are currently being evaluated. One promising approach is toxicogenomics, which by virtue of genome-wide molecular profiling after compound treatment can lead to an increased mechanistic understanding, and potentially allow for the prediction of a carcinogenic potential via mathematical modeling. The latter typically involves the extraction of informative genes from omics datasets, which can be used to construct generalizable models allowing for the early classification of compounds with unknown carcinogenic potential. Here we formally describe and compare two novel methodologies for the reproducible extraction of characteristic mRNA signatures, which were employed to capture specific gene expression changes observed for nongenotoxic carcinogens. While the first method integrates multiple gene rankings, generated by diverse algorithms applied to data from different subsamplings of the training compounds, the second approach employs a statistical ratio for the identification of informative genes. Both methods were evaluated on a dataset obtained from the toxicogenomics database TG-GATEs to predict the outcome of a two-year bioassay based on profiles from 14-day treatments. Additionally, we applied our methods to datasets from previous studies and showed that the derived prediction models are on average more accurate than those built from the original signatures. The selected genes were mostly related to p53 signaling and to specific changes in anabolic processes or energy metabolism, which are typically observed in tumor cells. Among the genes most frequently incorporated into prediction models were Phlda3, Cdkn1a, Akr7a3, Ccng1 and Abcb4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4020844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40208442014-05-21 Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver Eichner, Johannes Wrzodek, Clemens Römer, Michael Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Heidrun Zell, Andreas PLoS One Research Article The current gold-standard method for cancer safety assessment of drugs is a rodent two-year bioassay, which is associated with significant costs and requires testing a high number of animals over lifetime. Due to the absence of a comprehensive set of short-term assays predicting carcinogenicity, new approaches are currently being evaluated. One promising approach is toxicogenomics, which by virtue of genome-wide molecular profiling after compound treatment can lead to an increased mechanistic understanding, and potentially allow for the prediction of a carcinogenic potential via mathematical modeling. The latter typically involves the extraction of informative genes from omics datasets, which can be used to construct generalizable models allowing for the early classification of compounds with unknown carcinogenic potential. Here we formally describe and compare two novel methodologies for the reproducible extraction of characteristic mRNA signatures, which were employed to capture specific gene expression changes observed for nongenotoxic carcinogens. While the first method integrates multiple gene rankings, generated by diverse algorithms applied to data from different subsamplings of the training compounds, the second approach employs a statistical ratio for the identification of informative genes. Both methods were evaluated on a dataset obtained from the toxicogenomics database TG-GATEs to predict the outcome of a two-year bioassay based on profiles from 14-day treatments. Additionally, we applied our methods to datasets from previous studies and showed that the derived prediction models are on average more accurate than those built from the original signatures. The selected genes were mostly related to p53 signaling and to specific changes in anabolic processes or energy metabolism, which are typically observed in tumor cells. Among the genes most frequently incorporated into prediction models were Phlda3, Cdkn1a, Akr7a3, Ccng1 and Abcb4. Public Library of Science 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4020844/ /pubmed/24828355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097678 Text en © 2014 Eichner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eichner, Johannes
Wrzodek, Clemens
Römer, Michael
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Heidrun
Zell, Andreas
Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title_full Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title_fullStr Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title_short Evaluation of Toxicogenomics Approaches for Assessing the Risk of Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity in Rat Liver
title_sort evaluation of toxicogenomics approaches for assessing the risk of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity in rat liver
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097678
work_keys_str_mv AT eichnerjohannes evaluationoftoxicogenomicsapproachesforassessingtheriskofnongenotoxiccarcinogenicityinratliver
AT wrzodekclemens evaluationoftoxicogenomicsapproachesforassessingtheriskofnongenotoxiccarcinogenicityinratliver
AT romermichael evaluationoftoxicogenomicsapproachesforassessingtheriskofnongenotoxiccarcinogenicityinratliver
AT ellingerziegelbauerheidrun evaluationoftoxicogenomicsapproachesforassessingtheriskofnongenotoxiccarcinogenicityinratliver
AT zellandreas evaluationoftoxicogenomicsapproachesforassessingtheriskofnongenotoxiccarcinogenicityinratliver