Cargando…

The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance

BACKGROUND: The suction sockets that are commonly prescribed for transtibial amputees are believed to provide a better suspension than the pin/lock systems. Nevertheless, their effect on amputees’ gait performance has not yet been fully investigated. The main intention of this study was to understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gholizadeh, Hossein, Abu Osman, Noor Azuan, Eshraghi, Arezoo, Ali, Sadeeq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24827560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094520
_version_ 1782316156177088512
author Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
author_facet Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
author_sort Gholizadeh, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The suction sockets that are commonly prescribed for transtibial amputees are believed to provide a better suspension than the pin/lock systems. Nevertheless, their effect on amputees’ gait performance has not yet been fully investigated. The main intention of this study was to understand the potential effects of the Seal-in (suction) and the Dermo (pin/lock) suspension systems on amputees’ gait performance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ten unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this prospective study, and two prostheses were fabricated for each of them. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to evaluate the temporal-spatial, kinematics and kinetics variables during normal walking. We also asked the participants to complete some part of Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding their satisfaction and problems with both systems. The results revealed that there was more symmetry in temporal-spatial parameters between the prosthetic and sound limbs using the suction system. However, the difference between two systems was not significant (p<0.05). Evaluation of kinetic data and the subjects’ feedback showed that the participants had more confidence using the suction socket and the sockets were more fit for walking. Nevertheless, the participants had more complaints with this system due to the difficulty in donning and doffing. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that even though the suction socket could create better suspension, fit, and gait performance, overall satisfaction was higher with the pin/lock system due to easy donning and doffing of the prosthesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: irct.ir IRCT2014012816395N1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40210172014-05-21 The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The suction sockets that are commonly prescribed for transtibial amputees are believed to provide a better suspension than the pin/lock systems. Nevertheless, their effect on amputees’ gait performance has not yet been fully investigated. The main intention of this study was to understand the potential effects of the Seal-in (suction) and the Dermo (pin/lock) suspension systems on amputees’ gait performance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ten unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this prospective study, and two prostheses were fabricated for each of them. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to evaluate the temporal-spatial, kinematics and kinetics variables during normal walking. We also asked the participants to complete some part of Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding their satisfaction and problems with both systems. The results revealed that there was more symmetry in temporal-spatial parameters between the prosthetic and sound limbs using the suction system. However, the difference between two systems was not significant (p<0.05). Evaluation of kinetic data and the subjects’ feedback showed that the participants had more confidence using the suction socket and the sockets were more fit for walking. Nevertheless, the participants had more complaints with this system due to the difficulty in donning and doffing. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that even though the suction socket could create better suspension, fit, and gait performance, overall satisfaction was higher with the pin/lock system due to easy donning and doffing of the prosthesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: irct.ir IRCT2014012816395N1 Public Library of Science 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4021017/ /pubmed/24827560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094520 Text en © 2014 Gholizadeh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title_full The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title_fullStr The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title_short The Effects of Suction and Pin/Lock Suspension Systems on Transtibial Amputees’ Gait Performance
title_sort effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees’ gait performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24827560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094520
work_keys_str_mv AT gholizadehhossein theeffectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT abuosmannoorazuan theeffectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT eshraghiarezoo theeffectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT alisadeeq theeffectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT gholizadehhossein effectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT abuosmannoorazuan effectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT eshraghiarezoo effectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance
AT alisadeeq effectsofsuctionandpinlocksuspensionsystemsontranstibialamputeesgaitperformance