Cargando…
Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013 |
_version_ | 1782316174539751424 |
---|---|
author | Sankar, Viswanath Patrick, Erin Dieme, Robert Sanchez, Justin C. Prasad, Abhishek Nishida, Toshikazu |
author_facet | Sankar, Viswanath Patrick, Erin Dieme, Robert Sanchez, Justin C. Prasad, Abhishek Nishida, Toshikazu |
author_sort | Sankar, Viswanath |
collection | PubMed |
description | Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination as well as biotic changes due to tissue encapsulation as a result of the foreign body immune response. We reported earlier that large changes in electrode impedance measured at 1 kHz were correlated with poor electrode functional performance, quantified through electrophysiological recordings during the chronic lifetime of the electrode. There is a need to identity the factors that contribute to the chronic impedance variation. In this work, we use numerical simulation and regression to equivalent circuit models to evaluate both the abiotic and biotic contributions to the impedance response over chronic implant duration. COMSOL® simulation of abiotic electrode morphology changes provide a possible explanation for the decrease in the electrode impedance at long implant duration while biotic changes play an important role in the large increase in impedance observed initially. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40211122014-05-20 Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions Sankar, Viswanath Patrick, Erin Dieme, Robert Sanchez, Justin C. Prasad, Abhishek Nishida, Toshikazu Front Neuroeng Neuroscience Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination as well as biotic changes due to tissue encapsulation as a result of the foreign body immune response. We reported earlier that large changes in electrode impedance measured at 1 kHz were correlated with poor electrode functional performance, quantified through electrophysiological recordings during the chronic lifetime of the electrode. There is a need to identity the factors that contribute to the chronic impedance variation. In this work, we use numerical simulation and regression to equivalent circuit models to evaluate both the abiotic and biotic contributions to the impedance response over chronic implant duration. COMSOL® simulation of abiotic electrode morphology changes provide a possible explanation for the decrease in the electrode impedance at long implant duration while biotic changes play an important role in the large increase in impedance observed initially. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4021112/ /pubmed/24847248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sankar, Patrick, Dieme, Sanchez, Prasad and Nishida. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Sankar, Viswanath Patrick, Erin Dieme, Robert Sanchez, Justin C. Prasad, Abhishek Nishida, Toshikazu Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title | Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title_full | Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title_fullStr | Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title_short | Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
title_sort | electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sankarviswanath electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions AT patrickerin electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions AT diemerobert electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions AT sanchezjustinc electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions AT prasadabhishek electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions AT nishidatoshikazu electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions |