Cargando…

Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions

Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sankar, Viswanath, Patrick, Erin, Dieme, Robert, Sanchez, Justin C., Prasad, Abhishek, Nishida, Toshikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013
_version_ 1782316174539751424
author Sankar, Viswanath
Patrick, Erin
Dieme, Robert
Sanchez, Justin C.
Prasad, Abhishek
Nishida, Toshikazu
author_facet Sankar, Viswanath
Patrick, Erin
Dieme, Robert
Sanchez, Justin C.
Prasad, Abhishek
Nishida, Toshikazu
author_sort Sankar, Viswanath
collection PubMed
description Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination as well as biotic changes due to tissue encapsulation as a result of the foreign body immune response. We reported earlier that large changes in electrode impedance measured at 1 kHz were correlated with poor electrode functional performance, quantified through electrophysiological recordings during the chronic lifetime of the electrode. There is a need to identity the factors that contribute to the chronic impedance variation. In this work, we use numerical simulation and regression to equivalent circuit models to evaluate both the abiotic and biotic contributions to the impedance response over chronic implant duration. COMSOL® simulation of abiotic electrode morphology changes provide a possible explanation for the decrease in the electrode impedance at long implant duration while biotic changes play an important role in the large increase in impedance observed initially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40211122014-05-20 Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions Sankar, Viswanath Patrick, Erin Dieme, Robert Sanchez, Justin C. Prasad, Abhishek Nishida, Toshikazu Front Neuroeng Neuroscience Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination as well as biotic changes due to tissue encapsulation as a result of the foreign body immune response. We reported earlier that large changes in electrode impedance measured at 1 kHz were correlated with poor electrode functional performance, quantified through electrophysiological recordings during the chronic lifetime of the electrode. There is a need to identity the factors that contribute to the chronic impedance variation. In this work, we use numerical simulation and regression to equivalent circuit models to evaluate both the abiotic and biotic contributions to the impedance response over chronic implant duration. COMSOL® simulation of abiotic electrode morphology changes provide a possible explanation for the decrease in the electrode impedance at long implant duration while biotic changes play an important role in the large increase in impedance observed initially. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4021112/ /pubmed/24847248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sankar, Patrick, Dieme, Sanchez, Prasad and Nishida. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sankar, Viswanath
Patrick, Erin
Dieme, Robert
Sanchez, Justin C.
Prasad, Abhishek
Nishida, Toshikazu
Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title_full Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title_fullStr Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title_full_unstemmed Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title_short Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
title_sort electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847248
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00013
work_keys_str_mv AT sankarviswanath electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions
AT patrickerin electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions
AT diemerobert electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions
AT sanchezjustinc electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions
AT prasadabhishek electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions
AT nishidatoshikazu electrodeimpedanceanalysisofchronictungstenmicrowireneuralimplantsunderstandingabioticvsbioticcontributions