Cargando…
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments
BACKGROUND: Lack of appropriate reporting of methodological details has previously been shown to distort risk of bias assessments in randomized controlled trials. The same might be true for observational studies. The goal of this study was to compare the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessment for r...
Autores principales: | Lo, Carson Ka-Lok, Mertz, Dominik, Loeb, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Inter-rater and test–retest reliability of quality assessments by
novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle–Ottawa
Scales
por: Oremus, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank
por: Margulis, Andrea V, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Assessing impact of MALDI mass spectroscopy on reducing directed antibiotic coverage time for Gram-negative organisms
por: Lo, Calvin Ka-Fung, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing the reporting quality of influenza outbreaks in the community
por: Lo, Calvin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Pregnancy as a risk factor for severe influenza infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis
por: Mertz, Dominik, et al.
Publicado: (2019)