Cargando…

Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale

BACKGROUND: In many countries, rural areas are facing a shortage of general practitioners (GPs). Appropriate strategies to address this challenge are needed. From a health care delivery point of view, the term rural area is often poorly defined. However rural areas have to be adequately defined to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinhaeuser, Jost, Otto, Petra, Goetz, Katja, Szecsenyi, Joachim, Joos, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24694262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-147
_version_ 1782316260632035328
author Steinhaeuser, Jost
Otto, Petra
Goetz, Katja
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Joos, Stefanie
author_facet Steinhaeuser, Jost
Otto, Petra
Goetz, Katja
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Joos, Stefanie
author_sort Steinhaeuser, Jost
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In many countries, rural areas are facing a shortage of general practitioners (GPs). Appropriate strategies to address this challenge are needed. From a health care delivery point of view, the term rural area is often poorly defined. However rural areas have to be adequately defined to ensure specific strategies are tailored to these environments. The aims of this study were to translate the New Zealand 6-item Rural Ranking Scale (RRS), to culturally adapt it and to implement it to identify rural areas from a health care delivery perspective. Therefore we aimed to validate the RRS by defining cut-off scores for urban, semi-rural and rural areas in Germany. METHODS: After receiving permission, two researchers independently translated the RRS. In a consensus meeting, four items were identified that had to be culturally adapted. The modified RRS-Germany (mRRS-G) was sent to 724 GPs located in urban, semi-rural and rural areas to validate the “rurality” scoring system for conditions in Germany. RESULTS: Four items, “travelling time to next major hospital”, “on-call duty”, “regular peripheral clinic” and “on-call for major traumas” had to be adapted due to differences in the health care system. The survey had a response rate of 33.7%. A factor analysis showed a three dimensional structure of the mRRS-G scale with a poor internal consistency. Nevertheless, the three items regarding “on-call duty”, “next major hospital” and “most distant boundary covered by your practice” were identified as significant predictors for rurality. The adapted cut-off point for rurality in Germany was 16. From this study’s participants, 9 met the RRS cut-off point for rurality (a score of 35 or more). CONCLUSION: Compared with New Zealand rurality scores based on this tool, German scores are far less rural from a health care delivery point of view. We consider that the construct of rurality has more aspects than those assessed by the mRRS-G. Nevertheless, rural areas from a health care delivery viewpoint can be effectively defined using mRRS-G and therefore it can support tailored strategies against GPs shortage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40215612014-05-16 Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale Steinhaeuser, Jost Otto, Petra Goetz, Katja Szecsenyi, Joachim Joos, Stefanie BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In many countries, rural areas are facing a shortage of general practitioners (GPs). Appropriate strategies to address this challenge are needed. From a health care delivery point of view, the term rural area is often poorly defined. However rural areas have to be adequately defined to ensure specific strategies are tailored to these environments. The aims of this study were to translate the New Zealand 6-item Rural Ranking Scale (RRS), to culturally adapt it and to implement it to identify rural areas from a health care delivery perspective. Therefore we aimed to validate the RRS by defining cut-off scores for urban, semi-rural and rural areas in Germany. METHODS: After receiving permission, two researchers independently translated the RRS. In a consensus meeting, four items were identified that had to be culturally adapted. The modified RRS-Germany (mRRS-G) was sent to 724 GPs located in urban, semi-rural and rural areas to validate the “rurality” scoring system for conditions in Germany. RESULTS: Four items, “travelling time to next major hospital”, “on-call duty”, “regular peripheral clinic” and “on-call for major traumas” had to be adapted due to differences in the health care system. The survey had a response rate of 33.7%. A factor analysis showed a three dimensional structure of the mRRS-G scale with a poor internal consistency. Nevertheless, the three items regarding “on-call duty”, “next major hospital” and “most distant boundary covered by your practice” were identified as significant predictors for rurality. The adapted cut-off point for rurality in Germany was 16. From this study’s participants, 9 met the RRS cut-off point for rurality (a score of 35 or more). CONCLUSION: Compared with New Zealand rurality scores based on this tool, German scores are far less rural from a health care delivery point of view. We consider that the construct of rurality has more aspects than those assessed by the mRRS-G. Nevertheless, rural areas from a health care delivery viewpoint can be effectively defined using mRRS-G and therefore it can support tailored strategies against GPs shortage. BioMed Central 2014-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4021561/ /pubmed/24694262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-147 Text en Copyright © 2014 Steinhaeuser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steinhaeuser, Jost
Otto, Petra
Goetz, Katja
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Joos, Stefanie
Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title_full Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title_fullStr Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title_full_unstemmed Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title_short Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the Rural Ranking Scale
title_sort rural area in a european country from a health care point of view: an adaption of the rural ranking scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24694262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-147
work_keys_str_mv AT steinhaeuserjost ruralareainaeuropeancountryfromahealthcarepointofviewanadaptionoftheruralrankingscale
AT ottopetra ruralareainaeuropeancountryfromahealthcarepointofviewanadaptionoftheruralrankingscale
AT goetzkatja ruralareainaeuropeancountryfromahealthcarepointofviewanadaptionoftheruralrankingscale
AT szecsenyijoachim ruralareainaeuropeancountryfromahealthcarepointofviewanadaptionoftheruralrankingscale
AT joosstefanie ruralareainaeuropeancountryfromahealthcarepointofviewanadaptionoftheruralrankingscale