Cargando…

Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques

The laparoscopic approach has been established as the surgical procedure of choice for radical nephrectomy during the recent years. The advantages of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to the open approach are well-documented. The oncological results of the laparoscopic approach are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Aown, Abdulrahman, Kallidonis, Panagiotis, Kontogiannis, Stavros, Kyriayis, Iason, Panagopoulos, Vasilis, Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe, Liatsikos, Evangelos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130521
_version_ 1782316275033178112
author Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Kontogiannis, Stavros
Kyriayis, Iason
Panagopoulos, Vasilis
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Liatsikos, Evangelos
author_facet Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Kontogiannis, Stavros
Kyriayis, Iason
Panagopoulos, Vasilis
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Liatsikos, Evangelos
author_sort Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
collection PubMed
description The laparoscopic approach has been established as the surgical procedure of choice for radical nephrectomy during the recent years. The advantages of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to the open approach are well-documented. The oncological results of the laparoscopic approach are similar to the open procedure while the post-operative morbidity is lower. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy seems to gain ground to its open counterpart, as the accumulation of experience in the technique grows. In this review, a PubMed search in the latest literature on radical and partial laparoscopic nephrectomy took place and the outcome of the search is presented. Several issues about the surgical techniques and clinical efficacy are discussed. In addition, the preliminary experience in laparoscopic nephrectomy of one of the authoring institutions is also presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40216452014-05-15 Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques Al-Aown, Abdulrahman Kallidonis, Panagiotis Kontogiannis, Stavros Kyriayis, Iason Panagopoulos, Vasilis Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe Liatsikos, Evangelos Urol Ann Review Article The laparoscopic approach has been established as the surgical procedure of choice for radical nephrectomy during the recent years. The advantages of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to the open approach are well-documented. The oncological results of the laparoscopic approach are similar to the open procedure while the post-operative morbidity is lower. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy seems to gain ground to its open counterpart, as the accumulation of experience in the technique grows. In this review, a PubMed search in the latest literature on radical and partial laparoscopic nephrectomy took place and the outcome of the search is presented. Several issues about the surgical techniques and clinical efficacy are discussed. In addition, the preliminary experience in laparoscopic nephrectomy of one of the authoring institutions is also presented. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4021645/ /pubmed/24833817 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130521 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Kontogiannis, Stavros
Kyriayis, Iason
Panagopoulos, Vasilis
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Liatsikos, Evangelos
Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title_full Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title_fullStr Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title_short Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
title_sort laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130521
work_keys_str_mv AT alaownabdulrahman laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT kallidonispanagiotis laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT kontogiannisstavros laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT kyriayisiason laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT panagopoulosvasilis laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT stolzenburgjensuwe laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques
AT liatsikosevangelos laparoscopicradicalandpartialnephrectomytheclinicalefficacyandacceptanceofthetechniques