Cargando…
Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience
OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience and technique of performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the extraperitoneal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, between September 2010 to January 2012, were included in the study. All patients underwen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130555 |
_version_ | 1782316276612333568 |
---|---|
author | Dogra, Prem Nath Saini, Ashish Kumar Singh, Prabhjot Bora, Girdhar Nayak, Brusabhanu |
author_facet | Dogra, Prem Nath Saini, Ashish Kumar Singh, Prabhjot Bora, Girdhar Nayak, Brusabhanu |
author_sort | Dogra, Prem Nath |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience and technique of performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the extraperitoneal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, between September 2010 to January 2012, were included in the study. All patients underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients were placed supine with only 10-15(0) Trendelenburg tilt. The extraperitoneal space was developed behind the posterior rectus sheath. A five-port technique was used. After incision of endopelvic fascia and ligation of the deep venous complex, the rest of the procedure proceeded along the lines of the transperitoneal approach. RESULTS: The mean patient age, prostate size and Gleason score were 67 ± 1.8 years, 45 ± 9.55 g and 6, respectively. The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.50 ng/mL. The mean time required for creating extraperitoneal space, docking of robot and console time were 22, 7 and 94 min, respectively. The mean time to resume full oral feeds was 22 ± 3.45 h. There were no conversions from extraperitoneal to transperitoneal or open surgery in our series. Pathological stage was pT1, pT2a and pT3b in 11 (40.74%), 14 (51.85%) and two (7.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients had positive surgical margins and two had biochemical recurrence at the last follow-up. Our mean follow-up was 12 ± 3.30 (2-17) months. The overall continence rate was 83.33% and 92.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal RALP is an efficacious, minimally invasive approach for patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40216522014-05-15 Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience Dogra, Prem Nath Saini, Ashish Kumar Singh, Prabhjot Bora, Girdhar Nayak, Brusabhanu Urol Ann Original Article OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience and technique of performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the extraperitoneal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, between September 2010 to January 2012, were included in the study. All patients underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients were placed supine with only 10-15(0) Trendelenburg tilt. The extraperitoneal space was developed behind the posterior rectus sheath. A five-port technique was used. After incision of endopelvic fascia and ligation of the deep venous complex, the rest of the procedure proceeded along the lines of the transperitoneal approach. RESULTS: The mean patient age, prostate size and Gleason score were 67 ± 1.8 years, 45 ± 9.55 g and 6, respectively. The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.50 ng/mL. The mean time required for creating extraperitoneal space, docking of robot and console time were 22, 7 and 94 min, respectively. The mean time to resume full oral feeds was 22 ± 3.45 h. There were no conversions from extraperitoneal to transperitoneal or open surgery in our series. Pathological stage was pT1, pT2a and pT3b in 11 (40.74%), 14 (51.85%) and two (7.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients had positive surgical margins and two had biochemical recurrence at the last follow-up. Our mean follow-up was 12 ± 3.30 (2-17) months. The overall continence rate was 83.33% and 92.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal RALP is an efficacious, minimally invasive approach for patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4021652/ /pubmed/24833824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130555 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dogra, Prem Nath Saini, Ashish Kumar Singh, Prabhjot Bora, Girdhar Nayak, Brusabhanu Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title | Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title_full | Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title_fullStr | Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title_short | Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience |
title_sort | extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.130555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dograpremnath extraperitonealrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinitialexperience AT sainiashishkumar extraperitonealrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinitialexperience AT singhprabhjot extraperitonealrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinitialexperience AT boragirdhar extraperitonealrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinitialexperience AT nayakbrusabhanu extraperitonealrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinitialexperience |