Cargando…
A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12 |
_version_ | 1782316288285081600 |
---|---|
author | Candiota, Ana Paula Acosta, Milena Simões, Rui Vasco Delgado-Goñi, Teresa Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia Irure, Ainhoa Marradi, Marco Bomati-Miguel, Oscar Miguel-Sancho, Nuria Abasolo, Ibane Schwartz, Simó Santamaria, Jesús Penadés, Soledad Arús, Carles |
author_facet | Candiota, Ana Paula Acosta, Milena Simões, Rui Vasco Delgado-Goñi, Teresa Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia Irure, Ainhoa Marradi, Marco Bomati-Miguel, Oscar Miguel-Sancho, Nuria Abasolo, Ibane Schwartz, Simó Santamaria, Jesús Penadés, Soledad Arús, Carles |
author_sort | Candiota, Ana Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performance of new, selective CAs requires exhaustive assays and large amounts of material. Accordingly, in a preliminary screening of new CAs, it is important to choose candidate compounds with good potential for in vivo efficiency. This screening method should reproduce as close as possible the in vivo environment. In this sense, a fast and reliable method to select the best candidate CAs for in vivo studies would minimize time and investment cost, and would benefit the development of better CAs. RESULTS: The post-mortem ex vivo relative contrast enhancement (RCE) was evaluated as a method to screen different types of CAs, including paramagnetic and superparamagnetic agents. In detail, sugar/gadolinium-loaded gold nanoparticles (Gd-GNPs) and iron nanoparticles (SPIONs) were tested. Our results indicate that the post-mortem ex vivo RCE of evaluated CAs, did not correlate well with their respective in vitro relaxivities. The results obtained with different Gd-GNPs suggest that the linker length of the sugar conjugate could modulate the interactions with cellular receptors and therefore the relaxivity value. A paramagnetic CA (GNP (E_2)), which performed best among a series of Gd-GNPs, was evaluated both ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo RCE was slightly worst than gadoterate meglumine (201.9 ± 9.3% versus 237 ± 14%, respectively), while the in vivo RCE, measured at the time-to-maximum enhancement for both compounds, pointed to GNP E_2 being a better CA in vivo than gadoterate meglumine. This is suggested to be related to the nanoparticule characteristics of the evaluated GNP. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple, cost-effective relatively high-throughput method for selecting CAs for in vivo experiments. This method requires approximately 800 times less quantity of material than the amount used for in vivo administrations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40217102014-05-28 A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study Candiota, Ana Paula Acosta, Milena Simões, Rui Vasco Delgado-Goñi, Teresa Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia Irure, Ainhoa Marradi, Marco Bomati-Miguel, Oscar Miguel-Sancho, Nuria Abasolo, Ibane Schwartz, Simó Santamaria, Jesús Penadés, Soledad Arús, Carles J Nanobiotechnology Methodology BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performance of new, selective CAs requires exhaustive assays and large amounts of material. Accordingly, in a preliminary screening of new CAs, it is important to choose candidate compounds with good potential for in vivo efficiency. This screening method should reproduce as close as possible the in vivo environment. In this sense, a fast and reliable method to select the best candidate CAs for in vivo studies would minimize time and investment cost, and would benefit the development of better CAs. RESULTS: The post-mortem ex vivo relative contrast enhancement (RCE) was evaluated as a method to screen different types of CAs, including paramagnetic and superparamagnetic agents. In detail, sugar/gadolinium-loaded gold nanoparticles (Gd-GNPs) and iron nanoparticles (SPIONs) were tested. Our results indicate that the post-mortem ex vivo RCE of evaluated CAs, did not correlate well with their respective in vitro relaxivities. The results obtained with different Gd-GNPs suggest that the linker length of the sugar conjugate could modulate the interactions with cellular receptors and therefore the relaxivity value. A paramagnetic CA (GNP (E_2)), which performed best among a series of Gd-GNPs, was evaluated both ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo RCE was slightly worst than gadoterate meglumine (201.9 ± 9.3% versus 237 ± 14%, respectively), while the in vivo RCE, measured at the time-to-maximum enhancement for both compounds, pointed to GNP E_2 being a better CA in vivo than gadoterate meglumine. This is suggested to be related to the nanoparticule characteristics of the evaluated GNP. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple, cost-effective relatively high-throughput method for selecting CAs for in vivo experiments. This method requires approximately 800 times less quantity of material than the amount used for in vivo administrations. BioMed Central 2014-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4021710/ /pubmed/24708566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12 Text en Copyright © 2014 Candiota et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Candiota, Ana Paula Acosta, Milena Simões, Rui Vasco Delgado-Goñi, Teresa Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia Irure, Ainhoa Marradi, Marco Bomati-Miguel, Oscar Miguel-Sancho, Nuria Abasolo, Ibane Schwartz, Simó Santamaria, Jesús Penadés, Soledad Arús, Carles A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title | A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title_full | A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title_fullStr | A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title_full_unstemmed | A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title_short | A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
title_sort | new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate mri contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT candiotaanapaula anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT acostamilena anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT simoesruivasco anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT delgadogoniteresa anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT lopepiedrafitasilvia anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT irureainhoa anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT marradimarco anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT bomatimigueloscar anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT miguelsanchonuria anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT abasoloibane anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT schwartzsimo anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT santamariajesus anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT penadessoledad anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT aruscarles anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT candiotaanapaula newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT acostamilena newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT simoesruivasco newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT delgadogoniteresa newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT lopepiedrafitasilvia newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT irureainhoa newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT marradimarco newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT bomatimigueloscar newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT miguelsanchonuria newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT abasoloibane newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT schwartzsimo newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT santamariajesus newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT penadessoledad newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy AT aruscarles newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy |