Cargando…

A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Candiota, Ana Paula, Acosta, Milena, Simões, Rui Vasco, Delgado-Goñi, Teresa, Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia, Irure, Ainhoa, Marradi, Marco, Bomati-Miguel, Oscar, Miguel-Sancho, Nuria, Abasolo, Ibane, Schwartz, Simó, Santamaria, Jesús, Penadés, Soledad, Arús, Carles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12
_version_ 1782316288285081600
author Candiota, Ana Paula
Acosta, Milena
Simões, Rui Vasco
Delgado-Goñi, Teresa
Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia
Irure, Ainhoa
Marradi, Marco
Bomati-Miguel, Oscar
Miguel-Sancho, Nuria
Abasolo, Ibane
Schwartz, Simó
Santamaria, Jesús
Penadés, Soledad
Arús, Carles
author_facet Candiota, Ana Paula
Acosta, Milena
Simões, Rui Vasco
Delgado-Goñi, Teresa
Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia
Irure, Ainhoa
Marradi, Marco
Bomati-Miguel, Oscar
Miguel-Sancho, Nuria
Abasolo, Ibane
Schwartz, Simó
Santamaria, Jesús
Penadés, Soledad
Arús, Carles
author_sort Candiota, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performance of new, selective CAs requires exhaustive assays and large amounts of material. Accordingly, in a preliminary screening of new CAs, it is important to choose candidate compounds with good potential for in vivo efficiency. This screening method should reproduce as close as possible the in vivo environment. In this sense, a fast and reliable method to select the best candidate CAs for in vivo studies would minimize time and investment cost, and would benefit the development of better CAs. RESULTS: The post-mortem ex vivo relative contrast enhancement (RCE) was evaluated as a method to screen different types of CAs, including paramagnetic and superparamagnetic agents. In detail, sugar/gadolinium-loaded gold nanoparticles (Gd-GNPs) and iron nanoparticles (SPIONs) were tested. Our results indicate that the post-mortem ex vivo RCE of evaluated CAs, did not correlate well with their respective in vitro relaxivities. The results obtained with different Gd-GNPs suggest that the linker length of the sugar conjugate could modulate the interactions with cellular receptors and therefore the relaxivity value. A paramagnetic CA (GNP (E_2)), which performed best among a series of Gd-GNPs, was evaluated both ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo RCE was slightly worst than gadoterate meglumine (201.9 ± 9.3% versus 237 ± 14%, respectively), while the in vivo RCE, measured at the time-to-maximum enhancement for both compounds, pointed to GNP E_2 being a better CA in vivo than gadoterate meglumine. This is suggested to be related to the nanoparticule characteristics of the evaluated GNP. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple, cost-effective relatively high-throughput method for selecting CAs for in vivo experiments. This method requires approximately 800 times less quantity of material than the amount used for in vivo administrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40217102014-05-28 A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study Candiota, Ana Paula Acosta, Milena Simões, Rui Vasco Delgado-Goñi, Teresa Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia Irure, Ainhoa Marradi, Marco Bomati-Miguel, Oscar Miguel-Sancho, Nuria Abasolo, Ibane Schwartz, Simó Santamaria, Jesús Penadés, Soledad Arús, Carles J Nanobiotechnology Methodology BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performance of new, selective CAs requires exhaustive assays and large amounts of material. Accordingly, in a preliminary screening of new CAs, it is important to choose candidate compounds with good potential for in vivo efficiency. This screening method should reproduce as close as possible the in vivo environment. In this sense, a fast and reliable method to select the best candidate CAs for in vivo studies would minimize time and investment cost, and would benefit the development of better CAs. RESULTS: The post-mortem ex vivo relative contrast enhancement (RCE) was evaluated as a method to screen different types of CAs, including paramagnetic and superparamagnetic agents. In detail, sugar/gadolinium-loaded gold nanoparticles (Gd-GNPs) and iron nanoparticles (SPIONs) were tested. Our results indicate that the post-mortem ex vivo RCE of evaluated CAs, did not correlate well with their respective in vitro relaxivities. The results obtained with different Gd-GNPs suggest that the linker length of the sugar conjugate could modulate the interactions with cellular receptors and therefore the relaxivity value. A paramagnetic CA (GNP (E_2)), which performed best among a series of Gd-GNPs, was evaluated both ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo RCE was slightly worst than gadoterate meglumine (201.9 ± 9.3% versus 237 ± 14%, respectively), while the in vivo RCE, measured at the time-to-maximum enhancement for both compounds, pointed to GNP E_2 being a better CA in vivo than gadoterate meglumine. This is suggested to be related to the nanoparticule characteristics of the evaluated GNP. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple, cost-effective relatively high-throughput method for selecting CAs for in vivo experiments. This method requires approximately 800 times less quantity of material than the amount used for in vivo administrations. BioMed Central 2014-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4021710/ /pubmed/24708566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12 Text en Copyright © 2014 Candiota et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Candiota, Ana Paula
Acosta, Milena
Simões, Rui Vasco
Delgado-Goñi, Teresa
Lope-Piedrafita, Silvia
Irure, Ainhoa
Marradi, Marco
Bomati-Miguel, Oscar
Miguel-Sancho, Nuria
Abasolo, Ibane
Schwartz, Simó
Santamaria, Jesús
Penadés, Soledad
Arús, Carles
A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title_full A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title_short A new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate MRI contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
title_sort new ex vivo method to evaluate the performance of candidate mri contrast agents: a proof-of-concept study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24708566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-12-12
work_keys_str_mv AT candiotaanapaula anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT acostamilena anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT simoesruivasco anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT delgadogoniteresa anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT lopepiedrafitasilvia anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT irureainhoa anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT marradimarco anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT bomatimigueloscar anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT miguelsanchonuria anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT abasoloibane anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT schwartzsimo anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT santamariajesus anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT penadessoledad anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT aruscarles anewexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT candiotaanapaula newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT acostamilena newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT simoesruivasco newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT delgadogoniteresa newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT lopepiedrafitasilvia newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT irureainhoa newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT marradimarco newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT bomatimigueloscar newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT miguelsanchonuria newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT abasoloibane newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT schwartzsimo newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT santamariajesus newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT penadessoledad newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy
AT aruscarles newexvivomethodtoevaluatetheperformanceofcandidatemricontrastagentsaproofofconceptstudy