Cargando…
Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430 |
_version_ | 1782316303357313024 |
---|---|
author | Boon, Win McAllister, Jennifer Attar, Mohammad A. Chapman, Rachel L. Mullan, Patricia B. Haftel, Hilary M. |
author_facet | Boon, Win McAllister, Jennifer Attar, Mohammad A. Chapman, Rachel L. Mullan, Patricia B. Haftel, Hilary M. |
author_sort | Boon, Win |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rotations. Methods. In 2010, house officers in NICU rotations completed high fidelity NR simulation. We reviewed 80 house officers' videotaped performance on their initial high fidelity simulation session, prior to training and performance debriefing. We calculated the proportion of cases congruent with NR guidelines, using chi square analysis to evaluate performance across HR ranges relevant to NR decision-making: <60, 60–99, and ≥100 beats per minute (bpm). Results. 87% used umbilical cord palpation, 57% initiated HR assessment within 30 seconds, 70% were accurate, and 74% were communicated appropriately. HR determination accuracy varied significantly across HR ranges, with 87%, 57%, and 68% for HR <60, 60–99, and ≥100 bpm, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Timeliness, communication, and accuracy of house officers' HR determination are suboptimal, particularly for HR 60–100 bpm, which might lead to inappropriate decision-making and NR care. Training implications include emphasizing more accurate HR determination methods, better communication, and improved HR interpretation during NR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40218502014-06-01 Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation Boon, Win McAllister, Jennifer Attar, Mohammad A. Chapman, Rachel L. Mullan, Patricia B. Haftel, Hilary M. Int J Pediatr Research Article Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rotations. Methods. In 2010, house officers in NICU rotations completed high fidelity NR simulation. We reviewed 80 house officers' videotaped performance on their initial high fidelity simulation session, prior to training and performance debriefing. We calculated the proportion of cases congruent with NR guidelines, using chi square analysis to evaluate performance across HR ranges relevant to NR decision-making: <60, 60–99, and ≥100 beats per minute (bpm). Results. 87% used umbilical cord palpation, 57% initiated HR assessment within 30 seconds, 70% were accurate, and 74% were communicated appropriately. HR determination accuracy varied significantly across HR ranges, with 87%, 57%, and 68% for HR <60, 60–99, and ≥100 bpm, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Timeliness, communication, and accuracy of house officers' HR determination are suboptimal, particularly for HR 60–100 bpm, which might lead to inappropriate decision-making and NR care. Training implications include emphasizing more accurate HR determination methods, better communication, and improved HR interpretation during NR. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4021850/ /pubmed/24883063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430 Text en Copyright © 2014 Win Boon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boon, Win McAllister, Jennifer Attar, Mohammad A. Chapman, Rachel L. Mullan, Patricia B. Haftel, Hilary M. Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title | Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title_full | Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title_short | Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation |
title_sort | evaluation of heart rate assessment timing, communication, accuracy, and clinical decision-making during high fidelity simulation of neonatal resuscitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boonwin evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation AT mcallisterjennifer evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation AT attarmohammada evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation AT chapmanrachell evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation AT mullanpatriciab evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation AT haftelhilarym evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation |