Cargando…

Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation

Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boon, Win, McAllister, Jennifer, Attar, Mohammad A., Chapman, Rachel L., Mullan, Patricia B., Haftel, Hilary M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430
_version_ 1782316303357313024
author Boon, Win
McAllister, Jennifer
Attar, Mohammad A.
Chapman, Rachel L.
Mullan, Patricia B.
Haftel, Hilary M.
author_facet Boon, Win
McAllister, Jennifer
Attar, Mohammad A.
Chapman, Rachel L.
Mullan, Patricia B.
Haftel, Hilary M.
author_sort Boon, Win
collection PubMed
description Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rotations. Methods. In 2010, house officers in NICU rotations completed high fidelity NR simulation. We reviewed 80 house officers' videotaped performance on their initial high fidelity simulation session, prior to training and performance debriefing. We calculated the proportion of cases congruent with NR guidelines, using chi square analysis to evaluate performance across HR ranges relevant to NR decision-making: <60, 60–99, and ≥100 beats per minute (bpm). Results. 87% used umbilical cord palpation, 57% initiated HR assessment within 30 seconds, 70% were accurate, and 74% were communicated appropriately. HR determination accuracy varied significantly across HR ranges, with 87%, 57%, and 68% for HR <60, 60–99, and ≥100 bpm, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Timeliness, communication, and accuracy of house officers' HR determination are suboptimal, particularly for HR 60–100 bpm, which might lead to inappropriate decision-making and NR care. Training implications include emphasizing more accurate HR determination methods, better communication, and improved HR interpretation during NR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40218502014-06-01 Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation Boon, Win McAllister, Jennifer Attar, Mohammad A. Chapman, Rachel L. Mullan, Patricia B. Haftel, Hilary M. Int J Pediatr Research Article Objective. Accurate heart rate (HR) determination during neonatal resuscitation (NR) informs subsequent NR actions. This study's objective was to evaluate HR determination timeliness, communication, and accuracy during high fidelity NR simulations that house officers completed during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rotations. Methods. In 2010, house officers in NICU rotations completed high fidelity NR simulation. We reviewed 80 house officers' videotaped performance on their initial high fidelity simulation session, prior to training and performance debriefing. We calculated the proportion of cases congruent with NR guidelines, using chi square analysis to evaluate performance across HR ranges relevant to NR decision-making: <60, 60–99, and ≥100 beats per minute (bpm). Results. 87% used umbilical cord palpation, 57% initiated HR assessment within 30 seconds, 70% were accurate, and 74% were communicated appropriately. HR determination accuracy varied significantly across HR ranges, with 87%, 57%, and 68% for HR <60, 60–99, and ≥100 bpm, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Timeliness, communication, and accuracy of house officers' HR determination are suboptimal, particularly for HR 60–100 bpm, which might lead to inappropriate decision-making and NR care. Training implications include emphasizing more accurate HR determination methods, better communication, and improved HR interpretation during NR. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4021850/ /pubmed/24883063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430 Text en Copyright © 2014 Win Boon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boon, Win
McAllister, Jennifer
Attar, Mohammad A.
Chapman, Rachel L.
Mullan, Patricia B.
Haftel, Hilary M.
Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title_full Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title_short Evaluation of Heart Rate Assessment Timing, Communication, Accuracy, and Clinical Decision-Making during High Fidelity Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation
title_sort evaluation of heart rate assessment timing, communication, accuracy, and clinical decision-making during high fidelity simulation of neonatal resuscitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927430
work_keys_str_mv AT boonwin evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation
AT mcallisterjennifer evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation
AT attarmohammada evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation
AT chapmanrachell evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation
AT mullanpatriciab evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation
AT haftelhilarym evaluationofheartrateassessmenttimingcommunicationaccuracyandclinicaldecisionmakingduringhighfidelitysimulationofneonatalresuscitation