Cargando…

Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor

This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nittami, Tadashi, Hitomi, Tetsuo, Matsumoto, Kanji, Nakamura, Kazuho, Ikeda, Takaharu, Setoguchi, Yoshihiro, Motoori, Manabu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228
_version_ 1782316308352729088
author Nittami, Tadashi
Hitomi, Tetsuo
Matsumoto, Kanji
Nakamura, Kazuho
Ikeda, Takaharu
Setoguchi, Yoshihiro
Motoori, Manabu
author_facet Nittami, Tadashi
Hitomi, Tetsuo
Matsumoto, Kanji
Nakamura, Kazuho
Ikeda, Takaharu
Setoguchi, Yoshihiro
Motoori, Manabu
author_sort Nittami, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days treating a synthetic wastewater. The experiment was interrupted twice at days 5 and 13 when the modules were removed and cleaned physically and chemically in sequence. The pure water permeate flux of each membrane module was measured before and after each cleaning step to calculate membrane resistances. Results showed that fouling of membrane modules with 0.3 μm pore size was more rapid than other membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.5 and 1.0 μm). On the other hand, it was not clear whether fouling of the 0.5 μm membrane module was more severe than that of the 1.0 μm membrane module. This was partly because of the membrane condition after chemical cleaning, which seemed to determine the fouling of those modules over the next period. When irreversible resistance (R(i)) i.e., differences in membrane resistance before use and after chemical cleaning was high, the transmembrane pressure increased quickly during the next period irrespective of membrane pore size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40218892014-05-27 Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Nittami, Tadashi Hitomi, Tetsuo Matsumoto, Kanji Nakamura, Kazuho Ikeda, Takaharu Setoguchi, Yoshihiro Motoori, Manabu Membranes (Basel) Article This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days treating a synthetic wastewater. The experiment was interrupted twice at days 5 and 13 when the modules were removed and cleaned physically and chemically in sequence. The pure water permeate flux of each membrane module was measured before and after each cleaning step to calculate membrane resistances. Results showed that fouling of membrane modules with 0.3 μm pore size was more rapid than other membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.5 and 1.0 μm). On the other hand, it was not clear whether fouling of the 0.5 μm membrane module was more severe than that of the 1.0 μm membrane module. This was partly because of the membrane condition after chemical cleaning, which seemed to determine the fouling of those modules over the next period. When irreversible resistance (R(i)) i.e., differences in membrane resistance before use and after chemical cleaning was high, the transmembrane pressure increased quickly during the next period irrespective of membrane pore size. MDPI 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4021889/ /pubmed/24958174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nittami, Tadashi
Hitomi, Tetsuo
Matsumoto, Kanji
Nakamura, Kazuho
Ikeda, Takaharu
Setoguchi, Yoshihiro
Motoori, Manabu
Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title_full Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title_fullStr Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title_short Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
title_sort comparison of polytetrafluoroethylene flat-sheet membranes with different pore sizes in application to submerged membrane bioreactor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228
work_keys_str_mv AT nittamitadashi comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT hitomitetsuo comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT matsumotokanji comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT nakamurakazuho comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT ikedatakaharu comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT setoguchiyoshihiro comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor
AT motoorimanabu comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor