Cargando…
Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228 |
_version_ | 1782316308352729088 |
---|---|
author | Nittami, Tadashi Hitomi, Tetsuo Matsumoto, Kanji Nakamura, Kazuho Ikeda, Takaharu Setoguchi, Yoshihiro Motoori, Manabu |
author_facet | Nittami, Tadashi Hitomi, Tetsuo Matsumoto, Kanji Nakamura, Kazuho Ikeda, Takaharu Setoguchi, Yoshihiro Motoori, Manabu |
author_sort | Nittami, Tadashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days treating a synthetic wastewater. The experiment was interrupted twice at days 5 and 13 when the modules were removed and cleaned physically and chemically in sequence. The pure water permeate flux of each membrane module was measured before and after each cleaning step to calculate membrane resistances. Results showed that fouling of membrane modules with 0.3 μm pore size was more rapid than other membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.5 and 1.0 μm). On the other hand, it was not clear whether fouling of the 0.5 μm membrane module was more severe than that of the 1.0 μm membrane module. This was partly because of the membrane condition after chemical cleaning, which seemed to determine the fouling of those modules over the next period. When irreversible resistance (R(i)) i.e., differences in membrane resistance before use and after chemical cleaning was high, the transmembrane pressure increased quickly during the next period irrespective of membrane pore size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40218892014-05-27 Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Nittami, Tadashi Hitomi, Tetsuo Matsumoto, Kanji Nakamura, Kazuho Ikeda, Takaharu Setoguchi, Yoshihiro Motoori, Manabu Membranes (Basel) Article This study focused on phase separation of activated sludge mixed liquor by flat-sheet membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A 20 liter working volume lab-scale MBR incorporating immersed PTFE flat-sheet membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 μm) was operated for 19 days treating a synthetic wastewater. The experiment was interrupted twice at days 5 and 13 when the modules were removed and cleaned physically and chemically in sequence. The pure water permeate flux of each membrane module was measured before and after each cleaning step to calculate membrane resistances. Results showed that fouling of membrane modules with 0.3 μm pore size was more rapid than other membrane modules with different pore sizes (0.5 and 1.0 μm). On the other hand, it was not clear whether fouling of the 0.5 μm membrane module was more severe than that of the 1.0 μm membrane module. This was partly because of the membrane condition after chemical cleaning, which seemed to determine the fouling of those modules over the next period. When irreversible resistance (R(i)) i.e., differences in membrane resistance before use and after chemical cleaning was high, the transmembrane pressure increased quickly during the next period irrespective of membrane pore size. MDPI 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4021889/ /pubmed/24958174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nittami, Tadashi Hitomi, Tetsuo Matsumoto, Kanji Nakamura, Kazuho Ikeda, Takaharu Setoguchi, Yoshihiro Motoori, Manabu Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title | Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title_full | Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title_short | Comparison of Polytetrafluoroethylene Flat-Sheet Membranes with Different Pore Sizes in Application to Submerged Membrane Bioreactor |
title_sort | comparison of polytetrafluoroethylene flat-sheet membranes with different pore sizes in application to submerged membrane bioreactor |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes2020228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nittamitadashi comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT hitomitetsuo comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT matsumotokanji comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT nakamurakazuho comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT ikedatakaharu comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT setoguchiyoshihiro comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor AT motoorimanabu comparisonofpolytetrafluoroethyleneflatsheetmembraneswithdifferentporesizesinapplicationtosubmergedmembranebioreactor |