Cargando…
Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial
BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest in the importance of, and challenges associated with the involvement of patient and population (IPP) in the process of developing and adapting clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there is a lack of knowledge about the best method to use. This is especially probl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24721114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-118 |
_version_ | 1782316389647777792 |
---|---|
author | Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Perreault, Kadija Gagnon, Marie-Pierre |
author_facet | Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Perreault, Kadija Gagnon, Marie-Pierre |
author_sort | Lamontagne, Marie-Eve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest in the importance of, and challenges associated with the involvement of patient and population (IPP) in the process of developing and adapting clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there is a lack of knowledge about the best method to use. This is especially problematic in the field of rehabilitation, where individuals with disabilities might face many barriers to their involvement in the guideline development and adaptation process. The goal of this pilot trial is to document the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with a disability (traumatic brain injury) in CPG development. METHODS/DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized, crossover pragmatic trial will be performed with 20 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). They will be randomized into two groups, and each will try two alternative methods of producing recommendations; a discussion group (control intervention) and a Wiki, a webpage that can be modified by those who have access to it (experimental intervention). The participants will rate the acceptability of the two methods, and feasibility will be assessed using indicators such as the number of participants who accessed and completed the two methods, and the number of support interventions required. Twenty experts, blinded to the method of producing the recommendations, will independently rate the recommendations produced by the participants for clarity, accuracy, appropriateness and usefulness. DISCUSSION: Our trial will allow for the use of optimal IPP methods in a larger project of adapting guidelines for the rehabilitation of individuals with TBI. Ultimately the results will inform the science of CPG development and contribute to the growing knowledge about IPP in rehabilitation settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial KT Canada 87776. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4022363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40223632014-05-16 Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Perreault, Kadija Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest in the importance of, and challenges associated with the involvement of patient and population (IPP) in the process of developing and adapting clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there is a lack of knowledge about the best method to use. This is especially problematic in the field of rehabilitation, where individuals with disabilities might face many barriers to their involvement in the guideline development and adaptation process. The goal of this pilot trial is to document the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with a disability (traumatic brain injury) in CPG development. METHODS/DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized, crossover pragmatic trial will be performed with 20 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). They will be randomized into two groups, and each will try two alternative methods of producing recommendations; a discussion group (control intervention) and a Wiki, a webpage that can be modified by those who have access to it (experimental intervention). The participants will rate the acceptability of the two methods, and feasibility will be assessed using indicators such as the number of participants who accessed and completed the two methods, and the number of support interventions required. Twenty experts, blinded to the method of producing the recommendations, will independently rate the recommendations produced by the participants for clarity, accuracy, appropriateness and usefulness. DISCUSSION: Our trial will allow for the use of optimal IPP methods in a larger project of adapting guidelines for the rehabilitation of individuals with TBI. Ultimately the results will inform the science of CPG development and contribute to the growing knowledge about IPP in rehabilitation settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial KT Canada 87776. BioMed Central 2014-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4022363/ /pubmed/24721114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-118 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lamontagne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Perreault, Kadija Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title | Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title_full | Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title_short | Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
title_sort | evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two methods of involving patients with disability in developing clinical guidelines: study protocol of a randomized pragmatic pilot trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24721114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamontagnemarieeve evaluationoftheacceptabilityfeasibilityandeffectivenessoftwomethodsofinvolvingpatientswithdisabilityindevelopingclinicalguidelinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedpragmaticpilottrial AT perreaultkadija evaluationoftheacceptabilityfeasibilityandeffectivenessoftwomethodsofinvolvingpatientswithdisabilityindevelopingclinicalguidelinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedpragmaticpilottrial AT gagnonmariepierre evaluationoftheacceptabilityfeasibilityandeffectivenessoftwomethodsofinvolvingpatientswithdisabilityindevelopingclinicalguidelinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedpragmaticpilottrial |