Cargando…

Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis

BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that the gaze patterns of amputee users of myoelectric prostheses differ markedly from those seen in anatomically intact subjects. Gaze behaviour is a promising outcome measures for prosthesis designers, as it appears to reflect the strategies adopted by amputees to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobuh, Mohammad M D, Kenney, Laurence P J, Galpin, Adam J, Thies, Sibylle B, McLaughlin, Jane, Kulkarni, Jai, Kyberd, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24758375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-72
_version_ 1782316393702621184
author Sobuh, Mohammad M D
Kenney, Laurence P J
Galpin, Adam J
Thies, Sibylle B
McLaughlin, Jane
Kulkarni, Jai
Kyberd, Peter
author_facet Sobuh, Mohammad M D
Kenney, Laurence P J
Galpin, Adam J
Thies, Sibylle B
McLaughlin, Jane
Kulkarni, Jai
Kyberd, Peter
author_sort Sobuh, Mohammad M D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that the gaze patterns of amputee users of myoelectric prostheses differ markedly from those seen in anatomically intact subjects. Gaze behaviour is a promising outcome measures for prosthesis designers, as it appears to reflect the strategies adopted by amputees to compensate for the absence of proprioceptive feedback and uncertainty/delays in the control system, factors believed to be central to the difficulty in using prostheses. The primary aim of our study was to characterise visuomotor behaviours over learning to use a trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis. Secondly, as there are logistical advantages to using anatomically intact subjects in prosthesis evaluation studies, we investigated similarities in visuomotor behaviours between anatomically intact users of a trans-radial prosthesis simulator and experienced trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users. METHODS: In part 1 of the study, we investigated visuomotor behaviours during performance of a functional task (reaching, grasping and manipulating a carton) in a group of seven anatomically intact subjects over learning to use a trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis simulator (Dataset 1). Secondly, we compared their patterns of visuomotor behaviour with those of four experienced trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users (Dataset 2). We recorded task movement time, performance on the SHAP test of hand function and gaze behaviour. RESULTS: Dataset 1 showed that while reaching and grasping the object, anatomically intact subjects using the prosthesis simulator devoted around 90% of their visual attention to either the hand or the area of the object to be grasped. This pattern of behaviour did not change with training, and similar patterns were seen in Dataset 2. Anatomically intact subjects exhibited significant increases in task duration at their first attempts to use the prosthesis simulator. At the end of training, the values had decreased and were similar to those seen in Dataset 2. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides the first functional description of the gaze behaviours seen during use of a myoelectric prosthesis. Gaze behaviours were found to be relatively insensitive to practice. In addition, encouraging similarities were seen between the amputee group and the prosthesis simulator group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4022381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40223812014-05-16 Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis Sobuh, Mohammad M D Kenney, Laurence P J Galpin, Adam J Thies, Sibylle B McLaughlin, Jane Kulkarni, Jai Kyberd, Peter J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that the gaze patterns of amputee users of myoelectric prostheses differ markedly from those seen in anatomically intact subjects. Gaze behaviour is a promising outcome measures for prosthesis designers, as it appears to reflect the strategies adopted by amputees to compensate for the absence of proprioceptive feedback and uncertainty/delays in the control system, factors believed to be central to the difficulty in using prostheses. The primary aim of our study was to characterise visuomotor behaviours over learning to use a trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis. Secondly, as there are logistical advantages to using anatomically intact subjects in prosthesis evaluation studies, we investigated similarities in visuomotor behaviours between anatomically intact users of a trans-radial prosthesis simulator and experienced trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users. METHODS: In part 1 of the study, we investigated visuomotor behaviours during performance of a functional task (reaching, grasping and manipulating a carton) in a group of seven anatomically intact subjects over learning to use a trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis simulator (Dataset 1). Secondly, we compared their patterns of visuomotor behaviour with those of four experienced trans-radial myoelectric prosthesis users (Dataset 2). We recorded task movement time, performance on the SHAP test of hand function and gaze behaviour. RESULTS: Dataset 1 showed that while reaching and grasping the object, anatomically intact subjects using the prosthesis simulator devoted around 90% of their visual attention to either the hand or the area of the object to be grasped. This pattern of behaviour did not change with training, and similar patterns were seen in Dataset 2. Anatomically intact subjects exhibited significant increases in task duration at their first attempts to use the prosthesis simulator. At the end of training, the values had decreased and were similar to those seen in Dataset 2. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides the first functional description of the gaze behaviours seen during use of a myoelectric prosthesis. Gaze behaviours were found to be relatively insensitive to practice. In addition, encouraging similarities were seen between the amputee group and the prosthesis simulator group. BioMed Central 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4022381/ /pubmed/24758375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-72 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sobuh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sobuh, Mohammad M D
Kenney, Laurence P J
Galpin, Adam J
Thies, Sibylle B
McLaughlin, Jane
Kulkarni, Jai
Kyberd, Peter
Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title_fullStr Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title_short Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
title_sort visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24758375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-72
work_keys_str_mv AT sobuhmohammadmd visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT kenneylaurencepj visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT galpinadamj visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT thiessibylleb visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT mclaughlinjane visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT kulkarnijai visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis
AT kyberdpeter visuomotorbehaviourswhenusingamyoelectricprosthesis