Cargando…
Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblasti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172 |
_version_ | 1782316477007790080 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Hyun Kang, Sung Gu Kim, Seung Tae Kang, Seok Ho Choi, In Keun Park, Young Je Oh, Sang Chul Sung, Deuk Jae Seo, Jae Hong Cheon, Jun Shin, Sang Won Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jun Suk Park, Kyong Hwa |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Hyun Kang, Sung Gu Kim, Seung Tae Kang, Seok Ho Choi, In Keun Park, Young Je Oh, Sang Chul Sung, Deuk Jae Seo, Jae Hong Cheon, Jun Shin, Sang Won Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jun Suk Park, Kyong Hwa |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4022826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40228262014-05-21 Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment Lee, Jung Hyun Kang, Sung Gu Kim, Seung Tae Kang, Seok Ho Choi, In Keun Park, Young Je Oh, Sang Chul Sung, Deuk Jae Seo, Jae Hong Cheon, Jun Shin, Sang Won Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jun Suk Park, Kyong Hwa Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment. Korean Cancer Association 2014-04 2014-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4022826/ /pubmed/24851109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172 Text en Copyright © 2014 by the Korean Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jung Hyun Kang, Sung Gu Kim, Seung Tae Kang, Seok Ho Choi, In Keun Park, Young Je Oh, Sang Chul Sung, Deuk Jae Seo, Jae Hong Cheon, Jun Shin, Sang Won Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jun Suk Park, Kyong Hwa Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title | Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title_full | Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title_fullStr | Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title_short | Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment |
title_sort | modified mvac as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma after failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejunghyun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT kangsunggu modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT kimseungtae modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT kangseokho modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT choiinkeun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT parkyoungje modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT ohsangchul modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT sungdeukjae modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT seojaehong modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT cheonjun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT shinsangwon modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT kimyeulhong modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT kimjunsuk modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment AT parkkyonghwa modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment |