Cargando…

Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment

PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblasti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jung Hyun, Kang, Sung Gu, Kim, Seung Tae, Kang, Seok Ho, Choi, In Keun, Park, Young Je, Oh, Sang Chul, Sung, Deuk Jae, Seo, Jae Hong, Cheon, Jun, Shin, Sang Won, Kim, Yeul Hong, Kim, Jun Suk, Park, Kyong Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172
_version_ 1782316477007790080
author Lee, Jung Hyun
Kang, Sung Gu
Kim, Seung Tae
Kang, Seok Ho
Choi, In Keun
Park, Young Je
Oh, Sang Chul
Sung, Deuk Jae
Seo, Jae Hong
Cheon, Jun
Shin, Sang Won
Kim, Yeul Hong
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Kyong Hwa
author_facet Lee, Jung Hyun
Kang, Sung Gu
Kim, Seung Tae
Kang, Seok Ho
Choi, In Keun
Park, Young Je
Oh, Sang Chul
Sung, Deuk Jae
Seo, Jae Hong
Cheon, Jun
Shin, Sang Won
Kim, Yeul Hong
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Kyong Hwa
author_sort Lee, Jung Hyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4022826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40228262014-05-21 Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment Lee, Jung Hyun Kang, Sung Gu Kim, Seung Tae Kang, Seok Ho Choi, In Keun Park, Young Je Oh, Sang Chul Sung, Deuk Jae Seo, Jae Hong Cheon, Jun Shin, Sang Won Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Jun Suk Park, Kyong Hwa Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment. Korean Cancer Association 2014-04 2014-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4022826/ /pubmed/24851109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172 Text en Copyright © 2014 by the Korean Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jung Hyun
Kang, Sung Gu
Kim, Seung Tae
Kang, Seok Ho
Choi, In Keun
Park, Young Je
Oh, Sang Chul
Sung, Deuk Jae
Seo, Jae Hong
Cheon, Jun
Shin, Sang Won
Kim, Yeul Hong
Kim, Jun Suk
Park, Kyong Hwa
Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title_full Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title_fullStr Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title_short Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment
title_sort modified mvac as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma after failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.172
work_keys_str_mv AT leejunghyun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT kangsunggu modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT kimseungtae modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT kangseokho modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT choiinkeun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT parkyoungje modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT ohsangchul modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT sungdeukjae modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT seojaehong modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT cheonjun modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT shinsangwon modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT kimyeulhong modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT kimjunsuk modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment
AT parkkyonghwa modifiedmvacasasecondlinetreatmentforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaafterfailureofgemcitabineandcisplatintreatment