Cargando…

A new device for simple and accurate urinary pH testing by the Stone-former patient

PURPOSE: Urinary pH is an important factor linked to renal stone disease and a useful marker in the treatment of urolithiasis. Although the gold standard for measuring urinary pH utilizes a glass electrode and a pH meter, at present dipstick testing is largely used to estimate urinary pH. However, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grases, Felix, Rodriguez, Adrian, Berga, Francisco, Costa-Bauza, Antonia, Prieto, Rafael Maria, Burdallo, Isabel, Cadarso, Alfredo, Jimenez-Jorquera, Cecilia, Baldi, Antonio, Garganta, Rosendo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24839588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-209
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Urinary pH is an important factor linked to renal stone disease and a useful marker in the treatment of urolithiasis. Although the gold standard for measuring urinary pH utilizes a glass electrode and a pH meter, at present dipstick testing is largely used to estimate urinary pH. However, the accuracy and precision of this method may be insufficient for making clinical decisions in patients with lithiasis. The aim of this study is to describe a new device for urinary pH testing. METHODS: The device includes a pH sensor based on differential measurement of an ISFET-REFET pair. The drawbacks associated with this type of configuration, namely short lifetime and manual fabrication, have been overcome in the prototype. An automatic one point calibration is performed when turning on the system. Two buffer solutions were utilized to determine the intra- and inter-day precision of the device. The pH of 30 fresh human urine samples was measured using a pH-meter, a dipstick and the new electronic device. RESULTS: In some cases, dipstick measurements differed from those of the pH meter by more than 0.40 units, a clinically relevant discrepancy, whereas none of the measurements made with the new electronic device differed from the results of the pH-meter by more than 0.1 pH units. CONCLUSIONS: This new electronic device has the possibility to be used by stone-formers to control their urinary pH at home, increasing the tools available for stone prevention and prophylaxis.