Cargando…

Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal walls of root-end cavities for the presence of cracks after cavity preparation using US retrotips and Er: YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared by Protaper NiTi rotary system and obturated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydemir, Seda, Cimilli, Hale, Hazar Yoruç, Afife Binnaz, Kartal, Nevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883024
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.110168
_version_ 1782316521245114368
author Aydemir, Seda
Cimilli, Hale
Hazar Yoruç, Afife Binnaz
Kartal, Nevin
author_facet Aydemir, Seda
Cimilli, Hale
Hazar Yoruç, Afife Binnaz
Kartal, Nevin
author_sort Aydemir, Seda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal walls of root-end cavities for the presence of cracks after cavity preparation using US retrotips and Er: YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared by Protaper NiTi rotary system and obturated by lateral condensation. Three milimeters of root-end was resected. Twenty teeth were prepared with US retrotip (Group 1), 20 teeth with Er: YAG laser (Group 2), and 10 teeth without retropreparation (control group). The root-end surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Then the cracks of the resected root surfaces were evaluated on microphotographs. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was detected between US Group and Laser Group for complete, incomplete, intradentinal, and total number of cracks (P = 0.47, P = 0.80, P = 0.69, P = 0.869, respectively). CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of retropreparation technique on the development of apical cracks (P > 0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4023193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40231932014-05-30 Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study Aydemir, Seda Cimilli, Hale Hazar Yoruç, Afife Binnaz Kartal, Nevin Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal walls of root-end cavities for the presence of cracks after cavity preparation using US retrotips and Er: YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared by Protaper NiTi rotary system and obturated by lateral condensation. Three milimeters of root-end was resected. Twenty teeth were prepared with US retrotip (Group 1), 20 teeth with Er: YAG laser (Group 2), and 10 teeth without retropreparation (control group). The root-end surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Then the cracks of the resected root surfaces were evaluated on microphotographs. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was detected between US Group and Laser Group for complete, incomplete, intradentinal, and total number of cracks (P = 0.47, P = 0.80, P = 0.69, P = 0.869, respectively). CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of retropreparation technique on the development of apical cracks (P > 0.05). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4023193/ /pubmed/24883024 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.110168 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aydemir, Seda
Cimilli, Hale
Hazar Yoruç, Afife Binnaz
Kartal, Nevin
Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title_short Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study
title_sort evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: a scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883024
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.110168
work_keys_str_mv AT aydemirseda evaluationoftwodifferentrootendcavitypreparationtechniquesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT cimillihale evaluationoftwodifferentrootendcavitypreparationtechniquesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT hazaryorucafifebinnaz evaluationoftwodifferentrootendcavitypreparationtechniquesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT kartalnevin evaluationoftwodifferentrootendcavitypreparationtechniquesascanningelectronmicroscopestudy