Cargando…

Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Avanafil, a potent new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has been developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of this drug for the treatment of ED. A literature review was performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Yuan-Shan, Li, Nan, Zong, Huan-Tao, Yan, Hui-Lei, Zhang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589460
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.123670
_version_ 1782316545689518080
author Cui, Yuan-Shan
Li, Nan
Zong, Huan-Tao
Yan, Hui-Lei
Zhang, Yong
author_facet Cui, Yuan-Shan
Li, Nan
Zong, Huan-Tao
Yan, Hui-Lei
Zhang, Yong
author_sort Cui, Yuan-Shan
collection PubMed
description Avanafil, a potent new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has been developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of this drug for the treatment of ED. A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of avanafil for the treatment of ED. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were also investigated. Four publications, involving a total of 1381 patients, were used in the analysis, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared avanafil with a placebo. Among the co-primary efficacy end points indicating that avanafil 100 mg was more effective than a placebo were successful vaginal penetration (SEP2) (the odds ratio (OR) =5.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) =3.29–7.78, P< 0.00001) and successful intercourse (SEP3) (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.80–5.67, P< 0.00001). Men randomized to receive avanafil were less likely than those receiving the placebo to drop out due to an adverse event (AE) (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.54–4.08, P = 0.44). Specific AEs with avanafil included headache and flushing, which were significantly less likely to occur with placebo. This meta-analysis indicates that avanafil 100 or 200 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED. Compared with avanafil 100 mg, patients who take avanafil 200 mg are more likely to experience headaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4023381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40233812014-05-22 Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cui, Yuan-Shan Li, Nan Zong, Huan-Tao Yan, Hui-Lei Zhang, Yong Asian J Androl Original Article Avanafil, a potent new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has been developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of this drug for the treatment of ED. A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of avanafil for the treatment of ED. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were also investigated. Four publications, involving a total of 1381 patients, were used in the analysis, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared avanafil with a placebo. Among the co-primary efficacy end points indicating that avanafil 100 mg was more effective than a placebo were successful vaginal penetration (SEP2) (the odds ratio (OR) =5.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) =3.29–7.78, P< 0.00001) and successful intercourse (SEP3) (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.80–5.67, P< 0.00001). Men randomized to receive avanafil were less likely than those receiving the placebo to drop out due to an adverse event (AE) (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.54–4.08, P = 0.44). Specific AEs with avanafil included headache and flushing, which were significantly less likely to occur with placebo. This meta-analysis indicates that avanafil 100 or 200 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED. Compared with avanafil 100 mg, patients who take avanafil 200 mg are more likely to experience headaches. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4023381/ /pubmed/24589460 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.123670 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cui, Yuan-Shan
Li, Nan
Zong, Huan-Tao
Yan, Hui-Lei
Zhang, Yong
Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589460
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.123670
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiyuanshan avanafilformaleerectiledysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linan avanafilformaleerectiledysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zonghuantao avanafilformaleerectiledysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanhuilei avanafilformaleerectiledysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyong avanafilformaleerectiledysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis