Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Kun, Li, Heng, Xia, Ding, Hu, Zhiquan, Zhuang, Qianyuan, Liu, Jihong, Xu, Hua, Ye, Zhangqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24835573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667
_version_ 1782316590408138752
author Tang, Kun
Li, Heng
Xia, Ding
Hu, Zhiquan
Zhuang, Qianyuan
Liu, Jihong
Xu, Hua
Ye, Zhangqun
author_facet Tang, Kun
Li, Heng
Xia, Ding
Hu, Zhiquan
Zhuang, Qianyuan
Liu, Jihong
Xu, Hua
Ye, Zhangqun
author_sort Tang, Kun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared with ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to Mar 1, 2013. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative, pathologic and oncological variables, and post-op neobladder function and complications. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible trials evaluating LRC vs ORC were identified including seven prospective and nine retrospective studies. Although LRC was associated with longer operative time (p<0.001), patients might benefit from significantly fewer overall complications (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.001), less need of blood transfusion (p<0.001), less narcotic analgesic requirement (p<0.001), shorter time to ambulation (p = 0.03), shorter time to regular diet (p<0.001), fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.006), fewer positive lymph node (p = 0.05), lower distant metastasis rate (p = 0.05) and fewer death (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in other demographic parameters except for a lower ASA score (p = 0.01) in LRC while post-op neobladder function were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LRC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to ORC with reliable perioperative safety, pathologic & oncologic efficacy, comparable post-op neobladder function and fewer complications. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample prospective, multi-centric, long-term follow-up studies and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4023936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40239362014-05-21 Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Tang, Kun Li, Heng Xia, Ding Hu, Zhiquan Zhuang, Qianyuan Liu, Jihong Xu, Hua Ye, Zhangqun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared with ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to Mar 1, 2013. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative, pathologic and oncological variables, and post-op neobladder function and complications. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible trials evaluating LRC vs ORC were identified including seven prospective and nine retrospective studies. Although LRC was associated with longer operative time (p<0.001), patients might benefit from significantly fewer overall complications (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.001), less need of blood transfusion (p<0.001), less narcotic analgesic requirement (p<0.001), shorter time to ambulation (p = 0.03), shorter time to regular diet (p<0.001), fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.006), fewer positive lymph node (p = 0.05), lower distant metastasis rate (p = 0.05) and fewer death (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in other demographic parameters except for a lower ASA score (p = 0.01) in LRC while post-op neobladder function were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LRC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to ORC with reliable perioperative safety, pathologic & oncologic efficacy, comparable post-op neobladder function and fewer complications. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample prospective, multi-centric, long-term follow-up studies and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. Public Library of Science 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4023936/ /pubmed/24835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667 Text en © 2014 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Kun
Li, Heng
Xia, Ding
Hu, Zhiquan
Zhuang, Qianyuan
Liu, Jihong
Xu, Hua
Ye, Zhangqun
Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title_full Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title_short Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
title_sort laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24835573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667
work_keys_str_mv AT tangkun laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT liheng laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT xiading laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT huzhiquan laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT zhuangqianyuan laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT liujihong laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT xuhua laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies
AT yezhangqun laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies