Cargando…
Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667 |
_version_ | 1782316590408138752 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Kun Li, Heng Xia, Ding Hu, Zhiquan Zhuang, Qianyuan Liu, Jihong Xu, Hua Ye, Zhangqun |
author_facet | Tang, Kun Li, Heng Xia, Ding Hu, Zhiquan Zhuang, Qianyuan Liu, Jihong Xu, Hua Ye, Zhangqun |
author_sort | Tang, Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared with ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to Mar 1, 2013. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative, pathologic and oncological variables, and post-op neobladder function and complications. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible trials evaluating LRC vs ORC were identified including seven prospective and nine retrospective studies. Although LRC was associated with longer operative time (p<0.001), patients might benefit from significantly fewer overall complications (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.001), less need of blood transfusion (p<0.001), less narcotic analgesic requirement (p<0.001), shorter time to ambulation (p = 0.03), shorter time to regular diet (p<0.001), fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.006), fewer positive lymph node (p = 0.05), lower distant metastasis rate (p = 0.05) and fewer death (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in other demographic parameters except for a lower ASA score (p = 0.01) in LRC while post-op neobladder function were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LRC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to ORC with reliable perioperative safety, pathologic & oncologic efficacy, comparable post-op neobladder function and fewer complications. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample prospective, multi-centric, long-term follow-up studies and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4023936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40239362014-05-21 Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Tang, Kun Li, Heng Xia, Ding Hu, Zhiquan Zhuang, Qianyuan Liu, Jihong Xu, Hua Ye, Zhangqun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared with ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to Mar 1, 2013. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative, pathologic and oncological variables, and post-op neobladder function and complications. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible trials evaluating LRC vs ORC were identified including seven prospective and nine retrospective studies. Although LRC was associated with longer operative time (p<0.001), patients might benefit from significantly fewer overall complications (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.001), less need of blood transfusion (p<0.001), less narcotic analgesic requirement (p<0.001), shorter time to ambulation (p = 0.03), shorter time to regular diet (p<0.001), fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.006), fewer positive lymph node (p = 0.05), lower distant metastasis rate (p = 0.05) and fewer death (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in other demographic parameters except for a lower ASA score (p = 0.01) in LRC while post-op neobladder function were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LRC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to ORC with reliable perioperative safety, pathologic & oncologic efficacy, comparable post-op neobladder function and fewer complications. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample prospective, multi-centric, long-term follow-up studies and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings. Public Library of Science 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4023936/ /pubmed/24835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667 Text en © 2014 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, Kun Li, Heng Xia, Ding Hu, Zhiquan Zhuang, Qianyuan Liu, Jihong Xu, Hua Ye, Zhangqun Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title | Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title_full | Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title_short | Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies |
title_sort | laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangkun laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT liheng laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT xiading laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT huzhiquan laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT zhuangqianyuan laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT liujihong laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT xuhua laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies AT yezhangqun laparoscopicversusopenradicalcystectomyinbladdercancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudies |