Cargando…

DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery

Many of the structural and mechanistic requirements of oocyte-mediated nuclear reprogramming remain elusive. Previous accounts that transcriptional reprogramming of somatic nuclei in mouse zygotes may be complete in 24–36 hours, far more rapidly than in other reprogramming systems, raise the questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bingyuan, Pfeiffer, Martin J., Schwarzer, Caroline, Araúzo-Bravo, Marcos J., Boiani, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097199
_version_ 1782316590847492096
author Wang, Bingyuan
Pfeiffer, Martin J.
Schwarzer, Caroline
Araúzo-Bravo, Marcos J.
Boiani, Michele
author_facet Wang, Bingyuan
Pfeiffer, Martin J.
Schwarzer, Caroline
Araúzo-Bravo, Marcos J.
Boiani, Michele
author_sort Wang, Bingyuan
collection PubMed
description Many of the structural and mechanistic requirements of oocyte-mediated nuclear reprogramming remain elusive. Previous accounts that transcriptional reprogramming of somatic nuclei in mouse zygotes may be complete in 24–36 hours, far more rapidly than in other reprogramming systems, raise the question of whether the mere exposure to the activated mouse ooplasm is sufficient to enact reprogramming in a nucleus. We therefore prevented DNA replication and cytokinesis, which ensue after nuclear transfer, in order to assess their requirement for transcriptional reprogramming of the key pluripotency genes Oct4 (Pou5f1) and Nanog in cloned mouse embryos. Using transcriptome and allele-specific analysis, we observed that hundreds of mRNAs, but not Oct4 and Nanog, became elevated in nucleus-transplanted oocytes without DNA replication. Progression through the first round of DNA replication was essential but not sufficient for transcriptional reprogramming of Oct4 and Nanog, whereas cytokinesis and thereby cell-cell interactions were dispensable for transcriptional reprogramming. Responses similar to clones also were observed in embryos produced by fertilization in vitro. Our results link the occurrence of reprogramming to a previously unappreciated requirement of oocyte-mediated nuclear reprogramming, namely DNA replication. Nuclear transfer alone affords no immediate transition from a somatic to a pluripotent gene expression pattern unless DNA replication is also in place. This study is therefore a resource to appreciate that the quest for always faster reprogramming methods may collide with a limit that is dictated by the cell cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4023938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40239382014-05-21 DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery Wang, Bingyuan Pfeiffer, Martin J. Schwarzer, Caroline Araúzo-Bravo, Marcos J. Boiani, Michele PLoS One Research Article Many of the structural and mechanistic requirements of oocyte-mediated nuclear reprogramming remain elusive. Previous accounts that transcriptional reprogramming of somatic nuclei in mouse zygotes may be complete in 24–36 hours, far more rapidly than in other reprogramming systems, raise the question of whether the mere exposure to the activated mouse ooplasm is sufficient to enact reprogramming in a nucleus. We therefore prevented DNA replication and cytokinesis, which ensue after nuclear transfer, in order to assess their requirement for transcriptional reprogramming of the key pluripotency genes Oct4 (Pou5f1) and Nanog in cloned mouse embryos. Using transcriptome and allele-specific analysis, we observed that hundreds of mRNAs, but not Oct4 and Nanog, became elevated in nucleus-transplanted oocytes without DNA replication. Progression through the first round of DNA replication was essential but not sufficient for transcriptional reprogramming of Oct4 and Nanog, whereas cytokinesis and thereby cell-cell interactions were dispensable for transcriptional reprogramming. Responses similar to clones also were observed in embryos produced by fertilization in vitro. Our results link the occurrence of reprogramming to a previously unappreciated requirement of oocyte-mediated nuclear reprogramming, namely DNA replication. Nuclear transfer alone affords no immediate transition from a somatic to a pluripotent gene expression pattern unless DNA replication is also in place. This study is therefore a resource to appreciate that the quest for always faster reprogramming methods may collide with a limit that is dictated by the cell cycle. Public Library of Science 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4023938/ /pubmed/24836291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097199 Text en © 2014 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Bingyuan
Pfeiffer, Martin J.
Schwarzer, Caroline
Araúzo-Bravo, Marcos J.
Boiani, Michele
DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title_full DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title_fullStr DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title_full_unstemmed DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title_short DNA Replication Is an Integral Part of the Mouse Oocyte’s Reprogramming Machinery
title_sort dna replication is an integral part of the mouse oocyte’s reprogramming machinery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4023938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097199
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbingyuan dnareplicationisanintegralpartofthemouseoocytesreprogrammingmachinery
AT pfeiffermartinj dnareplicationisanintegralpartofthemouseoocytesreprogrammingmachinery
AT schwarzercaroline dnareplicationisanintegralpartofthemouseoocytesreprogrammingmachinery
AT arauzobravomarcosj dnareplicationisanintegralpartofthemouseoocytesreprogrammingmachinery
AT boianimichele dnareplicationisanintegralpartofthemouseoocytesreprogrammingmachinery