Cargando…

Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score

Our limited ability to assess spontaneous pain in rodent models of painful human conditions may be associated with a translational failure of promising analgesic compounds in to clinical use. If measurement of spontaneous pain behaviours can be used to generate an analgesic intervention score their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, Vanessa, De Rantere, Debbie, Ritchie, Rheanne, Chisholm, Jessica, Hecker, Kent G., Pang, Daniel S. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24838111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097882
_version_ 1782316609633779712
author Oliver, Vanessa
De Rantere, Debbie
Ritchie, Rheanne
Chisholm, Jessica
Hecker, Kent G.
Pang, Daniel S. J.
author_facet Oliver, Vanessa
De Rantere, Debbie
Ritchie, Rheanne
Chisholm, Jessica
Hecker, Kent G.
Pang, Daniel S. J.
author_sort Oliver, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description Our limited ability to assess spontaneous pain in rodent models of painful human conditions may be associated with a translational failure of promising analgesic compounds in to clinical use. If measurement of spontaneous pain behaviours can be used to generate an analgesic intervention score their use could expand to guide the use of analgesics, as mandated by regulatory bodies and ethical and welfare obligations. One such measure of spontaneous pain, the Rat Grimace Scale (RGS), has recently been described and shown to exhibit reliability. However, reliability of measurement scores is context and content specific, and further testing required to assess translation to a heterogenous setting (different model, raters, environment). The objectives of this study were to perform reliability testing with the Rat Grimace Scale in a heterogenous setting and generate an analgesic intervention score for its use. In a randomised, blinded study, sixteen adult female rats received one of three analgesia treatments (0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine subcutaneously, 1 mg/kg meloxicam subcutaneously, 0.2 mg/kg oral buprenorphine in jelly) peri-operatively (telemetry unit implantation surgery). Rats were video-recorded (before, 1–6 and 12 hours post-operatively) and images collected for independent scoring by three blinded raters using the RGS, and five experts based on “pain/no pain” assessment. Scores were used to calculate inter- and intra-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient and generate an analgesic intervention score with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The RGS scores showed very good inter- and intra-rater reliability (0.85 [0.78–0.90 95% CI] and 0.83 [0.76–0.89], respectively). An analgesic intervention threshold of greater than 0.67 was determined. These data demonstrate that the RGS is a useful tool which can be successfully employed in a heterogenous setting, and has the potential to guide analgesic intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4024023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40240232014-05-21 Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score Oliver, Vanessa De Rantere, Debbie Ritchie, Rheanne Chisholm, Jessica Hecker, Kent G. Pang, Daniel S. J. PLoS One Research Article Our limited ability to assess spontaneous pain in rodent models of painful human conditions may be associated with a translational failure of promising analgesic compounds in to clinical use. If measurement of spontaneous pain behaviours can be used to generate an analgesic intervention score their use could expand to guide the use of analgesics, as mandated by regulatory bodies and ethical and welfare obligations. One such measure of spontaneous pain, the Rat Grimace Scale (RGS), has recently been described and shown to exhibit reliability. However, reliability of measurement scores is context and content specific, and further testing required to assess translation to a heterogenous setting (different model, raters, environment). The objectives of this study were to perform reliability testing with the Rat Grimace Scale in a heterogenous setting and generate an analgesic intervention score for its use. In a randomised, blinded study, sixteen adult female rats received one of three analgesia treatments (0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine subcutaneously, 1 mg/kg meloxicam subcutaneously, 0.2 mg/kg oral buprenorphine in jelly) peri-operatively (telemetry unit implantation surgery). Rats were video-recorded (before, 1–6 and 12 hours post-operatively) and images collected for independent scoring by three blinded raters using the RGS, and five experts based on “pain/no pain” assessment. Scores were used to calculate inter- and intra-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient and generate an analgesic intervention score with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The RGS scores showed very good inter- and intra-rater reliability (0.85 [0.78–0.90 95% CI] and 0.83 [0.76–0.89], respectively). An analgesic intervention threshold of greater than 0.67 was determined. These data demonstrate that the RGS is a useful tool which can be successfully employed in a heterogenous setting, and has the potential to guide analgesic intervention. Public Library of Science 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4024023/ /pubmed/24838111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097882 Text en © 2014 Oliver et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oliver, Vanessa
De Rantere, Debbie
Ritchie, Rheanne
Chisholm, Jessica
Hecker, Kent G.
Pang, Daniel S. J.
Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title_full Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title_fullStr Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title_short Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score
title_sort psychometric assessment of the rat grimace scale and development of an analgesic intervention score
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24838111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097882
work_keys_str_mv AT olivervanessa psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore
AT deranteredebbie psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore
AT ritchierheanne psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore
AT chisholmjessica psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore
AT heckerkentg psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore
AT pangdanielsj psychometricassessmentoftheratgrimacescaleanddevelopmentofananalgesicinterventionscore