Cargando…

Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care

BACKGROUND: Missed, delayed or incorrect diagnoses are considered to be diagnostic errors. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology of a study to analyse cognitive aspects of the process by which primary care (PC) physicians diagnose dyspnoea. It examines the possible links between the u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minué, Sergio, Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara, Fernández, Alberto, Martín-Martín, José Jesús, Benítez, Vivian, Melguizo, Miguel, Caro, Araceli, Orgaz, María José, Prados, Miguel Angel, Díaz, José Enrique, Montoro, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-92
_version_ 1782316620926943232
author Minué, Sergio
Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara
Fernández, Alberto
Martín-Martín, José Jesús
Benítez, Vivian
Melguizo, Miguel
Caro, Araceli
Orgaz, María José
Prados, Miguel Angel
Díaz, José Enrique
Montoro, Rafael
author_facet Minué, Sergio
Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara
Fernández, Alberto
Martín-Martín, José Jesús
Benítez, Vivian
Melguizo, Miguel
Caro, Araceli
Orgaz, María José
Prados, Miguel Angel
Díaz, José Enrique
Montoro, Rafael
author_sort Minué, Sergio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Missed, delayed or incorrect diagnoses are considered to be diagnostic errors. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology of a study to analyse cognitive aspects of the process by which primary care (PC) physicians diagnose dyspnoea. It examines the possible links between the use of heuristics, suboptimal cognitive acts and diagnostic errors, using Reason’s taxonomy of human error (slips, lapses, mistakes and violations). The influence of situational factors (professional experience, perceived overwork and fatigue) is also analysed. METHODS: Cohort study of new episodes of dyspnoea in patients receiving care from family physicians and residents at PC centres in Granada (Spain). With an initial expected diagnostic error rate of 20%, and a sampling error of 3%, 384 episodes of dyspnoea are calculated to be required. In addition to filling out the electronic medical record of the patients attended, each physician fills out 2 specially designed questionnaires about the diagnostic process performed in each case of dyspnoea. The first questionnaire includes questions on the physician’s initial diagnostic impression, the 3 most likely diagnoses (in order of likelihood), and the diagnosis reached after the initial medical history and physical examination. It also includes items on the physicians’ perceived overwork and fatigue during patient care. The second questionnaire records the confirmed diagnosis once it is reached. The complete diagnostic process is peer-reviewed to identify and classify the diagnostic errors. The possible use of heuristics of representativeness, availability, and anchoring and adjustment in each diagnostic process is also analysed. Each audit is reviewed with the physician responsible for the diagnostic process. Finally, logistic regression models are used to determine if there are differences in the diagnostic error variables based on the heuristics identified. DISCUSSION: This work sets out a new approach to studying the diagnostic decision-making process in PC, taking advantage of new technologies which allow immediate recording of the decision-making process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4024115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40241152014-05-18 Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care Minué, Sergio Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara Fernández, Alberto Martín-Martín, José Jesús Benítez, Vivian Melguizo, Miguel Caro, Araceli Orgaz, María José Prados, Miguel Angel Díaz, José Enrique Montoro, Rafael BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Missed, delayed or incorrect diagnoses are considered to be diagnostic errors. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology of a study to analyse cognitive aspects of the process by which primary care (PC) physicians diagnose dyspnoea. It examines the possible links between the use of heuristics, suboptimal cognitive acts and diagnostic errors, using Reason’s taxonomy of human error (slips, lapses, mistakes and violations). The influence of situational factors (professional experience, perceived overwork and fatigue) is also analysed. METHODS: Cohort study of new episodes of dyspnoea in patients receiving care from family physicians and residents at PC centres in Granada (Spain). With an initial expected diagnostic error rate of 20%, and a sampling error of 3%, 384 episodes of dyspnoea are calculated to be required. In addition to filling out the electronic medical record of the patients attended, each physician fills out 2 specially designed questionnaires about the diagnostic process performed in each case of dyspnoea. The first questionnaire includes questions on the physician’s initial diagnostic impression, the 3 most likely diagnoses (in order of likelihood), and the diagnosis reached after the initial medical history and physical examination. It also includes items on the physicians’ perceived overwork and fatigue during patient care. The second questionnaire records the confirmed diagnosis once it is reached. The complete diagnostic process is peer-reviewed to identify and classify the diagnostic errors. The possible use of heuristics of representativeness, availability, and anchoring and adjustment in each diagnostic process is also analysed. Each audit is reviewed with the physician responsible for the diagnostic process. Finally, logistic regression models are used to determine if there are differences in the diagnostic error variables based on the heuristics identified. DISCUSSION: This work sets out a new approach to studying the diagnostic decision-making process in PC, taking advantage of new technologies which allow immediate recording of the decision-making process. BioMed Central 2014-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4024115/ /pubmed/24884984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-92 Text en Copyright © 2014 Minué et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Minué, Sergio
Bermúdez-Tamayo, Clara
Fernández, Alberto
Martín-Martín, José Jesús
Benítez, Vivian
Melguizo, Miguel
Caro, Araceli
Orgaz, María José
Prados, Miguel Angel
Díaz, José Enrique
Montoro, Rafael
Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title_full Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title_fullStr Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title_short Identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
title_sort identification of factors associated with diagnostic error in primary care
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-92
work_keys_str_mv AT minuesergio identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT bermudeztamayoclara identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT fernandezalberto identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT martinmartinjosejesus identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT benitezvivian identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT melguizomiguel identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT caroaraceli identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT orgazmariajose identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT pradosmiguelangel identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT diazjoseenrique identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare
AT montororafael identificationoffactorsassociatedwithdiagnosticerrorinprimarycare