Cargando…
How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection
Most theoretical research in sexual selection has focused on indirect selection. However, empirical studies have not strongly supported indirect selection. A well-established finding is that direct benefits and costs exert a strong influence on the evolution of mate choice. We present an analytical...
Autores principales: | Etienne, Loïc, Rousset, François, Godelle, Bernard, Courtiol, Alexandre |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0190 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Choosy Moral Punishers
por: Clavien, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Myo6 gets choosy
por: Tuma, Rbiya S.
Publicado: (2005) -
Does the choosiness of female crickets change as they age?
por: Sarmiento-Ponce, Edith Julieta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food
por: Charalabidis, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Effects of a sex ratio gradient on female mate-copying and choosiness in Drosophila melanogaster
por: Monier, Magdalena, et al.
Publicado: (2018)