Cargando…
The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found greater adiposity and cardiovascular risk in first born children. The causality of this association is not clear. Examining the association in diverse populations may lead to improved insight. METHODS: We examine the association between birth order and body ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.189 |
_version_ | 1782316642873638912 |
---|---|
author | Howe, L D Hallal, P C Matijasevich, A Wells, J C Santos, I S Barros, A J D Lawlor, D A Victora, C G Smith, G D |
author_facet | Howe, L D Hallal, P C Matijasevich, A Wells, J C Santos, I S Barros, A J D Lawlor, D A Victora, C G Smith, G D |
author_sort | Howe, L D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found greater adiposity and cardiovascular risk in first born children. The causality of this association is not clear. Examining the association in diverse populations may lead to improved insight. METHODS: We examine the association between birth order and body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) in the 2004 Pelotas cohort from southern Brazil and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) from Bristol, south-west England, restricting analysis to families with two children in order to remove confounding by family size. RESULTS: No consistent differences in BMI, SBP or DBP were observed comparing first and second born children. Within the Pelotas 2004 cohort, first born females were thinner, with lower SBP and DBP; for example, mean difference in SBP comparing first with second born was −0.979 (95% confidence interval −2.901 to 0.943). In ALSPAC, first born females had higher BMI, SBP and DBP. In both cohorts, associations tended to be in the opposite direction in males, although no statistical evidence for gender interactions was found. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support an association between birth order and BMI or blood pressure. Differences to previous studies may be explained by differences in populations and/or confounding by family size in previous studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4024316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40243162014-07-11 The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil Howe, L D Hallal, P C Matijasevich, A Wells, J C Santos, I S Barros, A J D Lawlor, D A Victora, C G Smith, G D Int J Obes (Lond) Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found greater adiposity and cardiovascular risk in first born children. The causality of this association is not clear. Examining the association in diverse populations may lead to improved insight. METHODS: We examine the association between birth order and body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) in the 2004 Pelotas cohort from southern Brazil and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) from Bristol, south-west England, restricting analysis to families with two children in order to remove confounding by family size. RESULTS: No consistent differences in BMI, SBP or DBP were observed comparing first and second born children. Within the Pelotas 2004 cohort, first born females were thinner, with lower SBP and DBP; for example, mean difference in SBP comparing first with second born was −0.979 (95% confidence interval −2.901 to 0.943). In ALSPAC, first born females had higher BMI, SBP and DBP. In both cohorts, associations tended to be in the opposite direction in males, although no statistical evidence for gender interactions was found. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support an association between birth order and BMI or blood pressure. Differences to previous studies may be explained by differences in populations and/or confounding by family size in previous studies. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07 2013-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4024316/ /pubmed/24097298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.189 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Howe, L D Hallal, P C Matijasevich, A Wells, J C Santos, I S Barros, A J D Lawlor, D A Victora, C G Smith, G D The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title | The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title_full | The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title_fullStr | The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title_short | The association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the United Kingdom and Brazil |
title_sort | association of birth order with later body mass index and blood pressure: a comparison between prospective cohort studies from the united kingdom and brazil |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howeld theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT hallalpc theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT matijasevicha theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT wellsjc theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT santosis theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT barrosajd theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT lawlorda theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT victoracg theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT smithgd theassociationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT howeld associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT hallalpc associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT matijasevicha associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT wellsjc associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT santosis associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT barrosajd associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT lawlorda associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT victoracg associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil AT smithgd associationofbirthorderwithlaterbodymassindexandbloodpressureacomparisonbetweenprospectivecohortstudiesfromtheunitedkingdomandbrazil |