Cargando…

Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants

OBJECTIVES: To examine the damage location distribution of five main body region injuries of maximum abbreviated injury score (MAIS) 3–6 injured occupants for nearside struck vehicle in front-to-side impact crashes. DESIGN AND SETTING: MAIS 3–6 injured occupants information was extracted from the US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Youming, Cao, Libo, Kan, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004371
_version_ 1782316664799363072
author Tang, Youming
Cao, Libo
Kan, Steven
author_facet Tang, Youming
Cao, Libo
Kan, Steven
author_sort Tang, Youming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the damage location distribution of five main body region injuries of maximum abbreviated injury score (MAIS) 3–6 injured occupants for nearside struck vehicle in front-to-side impact crashes. DESIGN AND SETTING: MAIS 3–6 injured occupants information was extracted from the US-National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System in the year 2007; it included the head/face/neck, chest, pelvis, upper extremity and lower extremity. Struck vehicle collision damage was classified in a three-dimensional system according to the J224 Collision Deformation Classification of SAE Surface Vehicle Standard. PARTICIPANTS: Nearside occupants seated directly adjacent to the struck side of the vehicle with MAIS 3–6 injured, in light truck vehicles–passenger cars (LTV–PC) side impact crashes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants by body regions and specific location of damage (lateral direction, horizontal direction and vertical direction) were examined. Injury risk ratio was also assessed. RESULTS: The lateral crush zone contributed to MAIS 3–6 injured occupants (n=705) and 50th centile injury risks when extended into zone 3. When the crush extended to zone 4, the injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants approached 81%. The horizontal crush zones contributing to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 occupants were zones ‘D’ and ‘Y’, and the injury risk ratios were 25.4% and 36.9%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 5.67% caused by zone ‘B’. The vertical crush zone which contributed to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 occupants was zone ‘E’, whose injury risk ratio was 58%. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 0.14% caused by zone ‘G+M’. CONCLUSIONS: The highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants caused by crush intrusion between 40 and 60 cm in LTV–PC nearside impact collisions and the damage region of the struck vehicle was in the zones ‘E’ and ‘Y’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4024600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40246002014-05-21 Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants Tang, Youming Cao, Libo Kan, Steven BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To examine the damage location distribution of five main body region injuries of maximum abbreviated injury score (MAIS) 3–6 injured occupants for nearside struck vehicle in front-to-side impact crashes. DESIGN AND SETTING: MAIS 3–6 injured occupants information was extracted from the US-National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System in the year 2007; it included the head/face/neck, chest, pelvis, upper extremity and lower extremity. Struck vehicle collision damage was classified in a three-dimensional system according to the J224 Collision Deformation Classification of SAE Surface Vehicle Standard. PARTICIPANTS: Nearside occupants seated directly adjacent to the struck side of the vehicle with MAIS 3–6 injured, in light truck vehicles–passenger cars (LTV–PC) side impact crashes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants by body regions and specific location of damage (lateral direction, horizontal direction and vertical direction) were examined. Injury risk ratio was also assessed. RESULTS: The lateral crush zone contributed to MAIS 3–6 injured occupants (n=705) and 50th centile injury risks when extended into zone 3. When the crush extended to zone 4, the injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants approached 81%. The horizontal crush zones contributing to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 occupants were zones ‘D’ and ‘Y’, and the injury risk ratios were 25.4% and 36.9%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 5.67% caused by zone ‘B’. The vertical crush zone which contributed to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 occupants was zone ‘E’, whose injury risk ratio was 58%. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 0.14% caused by zone ‘G+M’. CONCLUSIONS: The highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants caused by crush intrusion between 40 and 60 cm in LTV–PC nearside impact collisions and the damage region of the struck vehicle was in the zones ‘E’ and ‘Y’. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4024600/ /pubmed/24812190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004371 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Tang, Youming
Cao, Libo
Kan, Steven
Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title_full Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title_fullStr Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title_full_unstemmed Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title_short Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3–6 injured occupants
title_sort associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of mais 3–6 injured occupants
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004371
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyouming associationsbetweendamagelocationandfivemainbodyregioninjuriesofmais36injuredoccupants
AT caolibo associationsbetweendamagelocationandfivemainbodyregioninjuriesofmais36injuredoccupants
AT kansteven associationsbetweendamagelocationandfivemainbodyregioninjuriesofmais36injuredoccupants