Cargando…

Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) is an attenuated version of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and has utility in predicting mortality in non-surgical patients, but has yet to be tested among the trauma population. The objective was to evaluate REMS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imhoff, Bryan F, Thompson, Nia J, Hastings, Michael A, Nazir, Niaman, Moncure, Michael, Cannon, Chad M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24793256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004738
_version_ 1782316665498763264
author Imhoff, Bryan F
Thompson, Nia J
Hastings, Michael A
Nazir, Niaman
Moncure, Michael
Cannon, Chad M
author_facet Imhoff, Bryan F
Thompson, Nia J
Hastings, Michael A
Nazir, Niaman
Moncure, Michael
Cannon, Chad M
author_sort Imhoff, Bryan F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) is an attenuated version of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and has utility in predicting mortality in non-surgical patients, but has yet to be tested among the trauma population. The objective was to evaluate REMS as a risk stratification tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in traumatically injured patients and to compare REMS accuracy in predicting mortality to existing trauma scores, including the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Shock Index (SI). DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective chart review of the trauma registry from an urban academic American College of Surgeons (ACS) level 1 trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS: 3680 patients with trauma aged 14 years and older admitted to the hospital over a 4-year period. Patients transferred from other hospitals were excluded from the study as were those who suffered from burn or drowning-related injuries. Patients with vital sign documentation insufficient to calculate an REMS score were also excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The predictive ability of REMS was evaluated using ORs for in-hospital mortality. The discriminate power of REMS, RTS, ISS and SI was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Higher REMS was associated with increased mortality (p<0.0001). An increase of 1 point in the 26-point REMS scale was associated with an OR of 1.51 for in-hospital death (95% CI 1.45 to 1.58). REMS (area under the curve (AUC) 0.91±0.02) was found to be similar to RTS (AUC 0.89±0.04) and superior to ISS (AUC 0.87±0.01) and SI (AUC 0.55±0.31) in predicting in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In the trauma population, REMS appears to be a simple, accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality. While REMS performed similarly to RTS in predicting mortality, it did outperform other traditionally used trauma scoring systems, specifically ISS and SI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4024603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40246032014-05-21 Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study Imhoff, Bryan F Thompson, Nia J Hastings, Michael A Nazir, Niaman Moncure, Michael Cannon, Chad M BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) is an attenuated version of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and has utility in predicting mortality in non-surgical patients, but has yet to be tested among the trauma population. The objective was to evaluate REMS as a risk stratification tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in traumatically injured patients and to compare REMS accuracy in predicting mortality to existing trauma scores, including the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Shock Index (SI). DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective chart review of the trauma registry from an urban academic American College of Surgeons (ACS) level 1 trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS: 3680 patients with trauma aged 14 years and older admitted to the hospital over a 4-year period. Patients transferred from other hospitals were excluded from the study as were those who suffered from burn or drowning-related injuries. Patients with vital sign documentation insufficient to calculate an REMS score were also excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The predictive ability of REMS was evaluated using ORs for in-hospital mortality. The discriminate power of REMS, RTS, ISS and SI was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Higher REMS was associated with increased mortality (p<0.0001). An increase of 1 point in the 26-point REMS scale was associated with an OR of 1.51 for in-hospital death (95% CI 1.45 to 1.58). REMS (area under the curve (AUC) 0.91±0.02) was found to be similar to RTS (AUC 0.89±0.04) and superior to ISS (AUC 0.87±0.01) and SI (AUC 0.55±0.31) in predicting in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In the trauma population, REMS appears to be a simple, accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality. While REMS performed similarly to RTS in predicting mortality, it did outperform other traditionally used trauma scoring systems, specifically ISS and SI. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4024603/ /pubmed/24793256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004738 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Imhoff, Bryan F
Thompson, Nia J
Hastings, Michael A
Nazir, Niaman
Moncure, Michael
Cannon, Chad M
Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title_full Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title_short Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
title_sort rapid emergency medicine score (rems) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24793256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004738
work_keys_str_mv AT imhoffbryanf rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy
AT thompsonniaj rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy
AT hastingsmichaela rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy
AT nazirniaman rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy
AT moncuremichael rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy
AT cannonchadm rapidemergencymedicinescoreremsinthetraumapopulationaretrospectivestudy