Cargando…

Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles

In order to calculate the dose for nanoparticles (NP), (i) relevant information about the dose metrics and (ii) a proper dose concept are crucial. Since the appropriate metrics for NP toxicity are yet to be elaborated, a general dose calculation model for nanomaterials is not available. Here we prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simkó, Myrtill, Nosske, Dietmar, Kreyling, Wolfgang G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404026
_version_ 1782316717809074176
author Simkó, Myrtill
Nosske, Dietmar
Kreyling, Wolfgang G.
author_facet Simkó, Myrtill
Nosske, Dietmar
Kreyling, Wolfgang G.
author_sort Simkó, Myrtill
collection PubMed
description In order to calculate the dose for nanoparticles (NP), (i) relevant information about the dose metrics and (ii) a proper dose concept are crucial. Since the appropriate metrics for NP toxicity are yet to be elaborated, a general dose calculation model for nanomaterials is not available. Here we propose how to develop a dose assessment model for NP in analogy to the radiation protection dose calculation, introducing the so-called “deposited and the equivalent dose”. As a dose metric we propose the total deposited NP surface area (SA), which has been shown frequently to determine toxicological responses e.g. of lung tissue. The deposited NP dose is proportional to the total surface area of deposited NP per tissue mass, and takes into account primary and agglomerated NP. By using several weighting factors the equivalent dose additionally takes into account various physico-chemical properties of the NP which are influencing the biological responses. These weighting factors consider the specific surface area, the surface textures, the zeta-potential as a measure for surface charge, the particle morphology such as the shape and the length-to-diameter ratio (aspect ratio), the band gap energy levels of metal and metal oxide NP, and the particle dissolution rate. Furthermore, we discuss how these weighting factors influence the equivalent dose of the deposited NP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4025021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40250212014-05-19 Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles Simkó, Myrtill Nosske, Dietmar Kreyling, Wolfgang G. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In order to calculate the dose for nanoparticles (NP), (i) relevant information about the dose metrics and (ii) a proper dose concept are crucial. Since the appropriate metrics for NP toxicity are yet to be elaborated, a general dose calculation model for nanomaterials is not available. Here we propose how to develop a dose assessment model for NP in analogy to the radiation protection dose calculation, introducing the so-called “deposited and the equivalent dose”. As a dose metric we propose the total deposited NP surface area (SA), which has been shown frequently to determine toxicological responses e.g. of lung tissue. The deposited NP dose is proportional to the total surface area of deposited NP per tissue mass, and takes into account primary and agglomerated NP. By using several weighting factors the equivalent dose additionally takes into account various physico-chemical properties of the NP which are influencing the biological responses. These weighting factors consider the specific surface area, the surface textures, the zeta-potential as a measure for surface charge, the particle morphology such as the shape and the length-to-diameter ratio (aspect ratio), the band gap energy levels of metal and metal oxide NP, and the particle dissolution rate. Furthermore, we discuss how these weighting factors influence the equivalent dose of the deposited NP. MDPI 2014-04-14 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4025021/ /pubmed/24736686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404026 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simkó, Myrtill
Nosske, Dietmar
Kreyling, Wolfgang G.
Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title_full Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title_fullStr Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title_full_unstemmed Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title_short Metrics, Dose, and Dose Concept: The Need for a Proper Dose Concept in the Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles
title_sort metrics, dose, and dose concept: the need for a proper dose concept in the risk assessment of nanoparticles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24736686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404026
work_keys_str_mv AT simkomyrtill metricsdoseanddoseconcepttheneedforaproperdoseconceptintheriskassessmentofnanoparticles
AT nosskedietmar metricsdoseanddoseconcepttheneedforaproperdoseconceptintheriskassessmentofnanoparticles
AT kreylingwolfgangg metricsdoseanddoseconcepttheneedforaproperdoseconceptintheriskassessmentofnanoparticles