Cargando…
Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water
As reclaimed water use expands, it is important to evaluate potential occupational health risks from exposure to this alternative water source. We compared odds of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), vancomycin-resistant ent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24747541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404340 |
_version_ | 1782316718724481024 |
---|---|
author | Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Micallef, Shirley A. Gibbs, Shawn G. He, Xin George, Ashish Sapkota, Amir Joseph, Sam W. Sapkota, Amy R. |
author_facet | Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Micallef, Shirley A. Gibbs, Shawn G. He, Xin George, Ashish Sapkota, Amir Joseph, Sam W. Sapkota, Amy R. |
author_sort | Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As reclaimed water use expands, it is important to evaluate potential occupational health risks from exposure to this alternative water source. We compared odds of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) between spray irrigation workers using reclaimed water and office worker controls. Nasal and dermal swabs from 19 spray irrigation workers and 24 office worker controls were collected and analyzed for MRSA, MSSA, VRE, and VSE. Isolates were confirmed using standard biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction assays. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Sensititre(®) microbroth dilution. Data were analyzed by two-sample proportion, chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression. No MRSA or VRE were detected in any samples. MSSA was detected in 26% and 29% of spray irrigators and controls, respectively. VSE was detected in 11% and 0% of spray irrigation workers and controls, respectively. The adjusted odds of MSSA, multidrug-resistant MSSA, and either MSSA or VSE colonization were greater among spray irrigation workers, however results were not statistically significant. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate this relationship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4025025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40250252014-05-19 Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Micallef, Shirley A. Gibbs, Shawn G. He, Xin George, Ashish Sapkota, Amir Joseph, Sam W. Sapkota, Amy R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article As reclaimed water use expands, it is important to evaluate potential occupational health risks from exposure to this alternative water source. We compared odds of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) between spray irrigation workers using reclaimed water and office worker controls. Nasal and dermal swabs from 19 spray irrigation workers and 24 office worker controls were collected and analyzed for MRSA, MSSA, VRE, and VSE. Isolates were confirmed using standard biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction assays. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Sensititre(®) microbroth dilution. Data were analyzed by two-sample proportion, chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression. No MRSA or VRE were detected in any samples. MSSA was detected in 26% and 29% of spray irrigators and controls, respectively. VSE was detected in 11% and 0% of spray irrigation workers and controls, respectively. The adjusted odds of MSSA, multidrug-resistant MSSA, and either MSSA or VSE colonization were greater among spray irrigation workers, however results were not statistically significant. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate this relationship. MDPI 2014-04-17 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4025025/ /pubmed/24747541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404340 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Micallef, Shirley A. Gibbs, Shawn G. He, Xin George, Ashish Sapkota, Amir Joseph, Sam W. Sapkota, Amy R. Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title | Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title_full | Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title_fullStr | Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title_short | Occupational Exposure to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. among Spray Irrigation Workers Using Reclaimed Water |
title_sort | occupational exposure to staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus spp. among spray irrigation workers using reclaimed water |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24747541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110404340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenberggoldsteinrachele occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT micallefshirleya occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT gibbsshawng occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT hexin occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT georgeashish occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT sapkotaamir occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT josephsamw occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater AT sapkotaamyr occupationalexposuretostaphylococcusaureusandenterococcussppamongsprayirrigationworkersusingreclaimedwater |