Cargando…

Weight reduction is associated with improvement of glycemic control in Japanese men, whose hemoglobin A1C is 5.6–6.4%, with visceral fat accumulation, but not without visceral fat accumulation

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to determine whether weight reduction is associated with improvement of glycemic control in non‐obese and obese subjects with or without visceral fat accumulation, whose hemoglobin A1c (A1C) is 5.6–6.4%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 798 male s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okauchi, Yukiyoshi, Iwahashi, Hiromi, Okita, Kohei, Funahashi, Tohru, Kishida, Ken, Noguchi, Midori, Ohira, Tetsuya, Nakamura, Tadashi, Imagawa, Akihisa, Shimomura, Iichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12084
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to determine whether weight reduction is associated with improvement of glycemic control in non‐obese and obese subjects with or without visceral fat accumulation, whose hemoglobin A1c (A1C) is 5.6–6.4%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 798 male subjects whose A1C levels were between 5.6% and 6.4% were divided into subgroups based on body mass index (BMI) and/or estimated visceral fat area (eVFA), and were analyzed with respect to the relationships between 1‐year changes in BMI (ΔBMI) and A1C (ΔA1C). RESULTS: In both the BMI ≥25 and BMI <25 groups, ΔA1C correlated positively with ΔBMI (BMI ≥25 (n = 321): r = 0.236, P < 0.0001; BMI <25 (n = 477): r = 0.095, P = 0.0387) although the r‐value was very small for the latter group. In addition, for the group with eVFA ≥100 cm(2) (n = 436), ΔA1C correlated positively with ΔeVFA (r = 0.150, P = 0.0017), but this correlation was not found for the eVFA <100 cm(2) group (n = 339, P = 0.3505). Furthermore, ΔA1C positively correlated with ΔBMI for the groups in BMI ≥25 with eVFA >100 cm(2) (n = 293, r = 0.256, P < 0.0001) and BMI <25 with eVFA ≥100 cm(2) (n = 145, r = 0.250, P = 0.0024), but not for the groups in BMI ≥25 with eVFA <100 cm(2) (n = 28, P = 0.6401) nor BMI <25 with eVFA <100 cm(2) (n = 332, P = 0.6605). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the assessment of visceral fat, rather than BMI, might be more important in identifying subjects in whom lifestyle intervention aiming at weight reduction could be effective to prevent diabetes. This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (no. UMIN 000002391).