Cargando…

Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?

Bulk modulus of elasticity (ɛ), depicting the flexibility of plant tissues, is recognized as an important component in maintaining internal water balance. Elevated ɛ and comparatively low osmotic potential (Ψ(π)) may work in concert to effectively maintain vital cellular water content. This concept,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Touchette, Brant W., Marcus, Sarah E., Adams, Emily C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu014
_version_ 1782316745187393536
author Touchette, Brant W.
Marcus, Sarah E.
Adams, Emily C.
author_facet Touchette, Brant W.
Marcus, Sarah E.
Adams, Emily C.
author_sort Touchette, Brant W.
collection PubMed
description Bulk modulus of elasticity (ɛ), depicting the flexibility of plant tissues, is recognized as an important component in maintaining internal water balance. Elevated ɛ and comparatively low osmotic potential (Ψ(π)) may work in concert to effectively maintain vital cellular water content. This concept, termed the ‘cell water conservation hypothesis’, may foster tolerance for lower soil-water potentials in plants while minimizing cell dehydration and shrinkage. Therefore, the accumulation of solutes in marine plants, causing decreases in Ψ(π), play an important role in plant–water relations and likely works with higher ɛ to achieve favourable cell volumes. While it is generally held that plants residing in marine systems have higher leaf tissue ɛ, to our knowledge no study has specifically addressed this notion in aquatic and wetland plants residing in marine and freshwater systems. Therefore, we compared ɛ and Ψ(π) in leaf tissues of 38 freshwater, coastal and marine plant species using data collected in our laboratory, with additional values from the literature. Overall, 8 of the 10 highest ɛ values were observed in marine plants, and 20 of the lowest 25 ɛ values were recorded in freshwater plants. As expected, marine plants often had lower Ψ(π), wherein the majority of marine plants were below −1.0 MPa and the majority of freshwater plants were above −1.0 MPa. While there were no differences among habitat type and symplastic water content (θ(sym)), we did observe higher θ(sym) in shrubs when compared with graminoids, and believe that the comparatively low θ(sym) observed in aquatic grasses may be attributed to their tendency to develop aerenchyma that hold apoplastic water. These results, with few exceptions, support the premise that leaf tissues of plants acclimated to marine environments tend to have higher ɛ and lower Ψ(π), and agree with the general tenets of the cell water conservation hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4025192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40251922014-05-19 Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid? Touchette, Brant W. Marcus, Sarah E. Adams, Emily C. AoB Plants Research Articles Bulk modulus of elasticity (ɛ), depicting the flexibility of plant tissues, is recognized as an important component in maintaining internal water balance. Elevated ɛ and comparatively low osmotic potential (Ψ(π)) may work in concert to effectively maintain vital cellular water content. This concept, termed the ‘cell water conservation hypothesis’, may foster tolerance for lower soil-water potentials in plants while minimizing cell dehydration and shrinkage. Therefore, the accumulation of solutes in marine plants, causing decreases in Ψ(π), play an important role in plant–water relations and likely works with higher ɛ to achieve favourable cell volumes. While it is generally held that plants residing in marine systems have higher leaf tissue ɛ, to our knowledge no study has specifically addressed this notion in aquatic and wetland plants residing in marine and freshwater systems. Therefore, we compared ɛ and Ψ(π) in leaf tissues of 38 freshwater, coastal and marine plant species using data collected in our laboratory, with additional values from the literature. Overall, 8 of the 10 highest ɛ values were observed in marine plants, and 20 of the lowest 25 ɛ values were recorded in freshwater plants. As expected, marine plants often had lower Ψ(π), wherein the majority of marine plants were below −1.0 MPa and the majority of freshwater plants were above −1.0 MPa. While there were no differences among habitat type and symplastic water content (θ(sym)), we did observe higher θ(sym) in shrubs when compared with graminoids, and believe that the comparatively low θ(sym) observed in aquatic grasses may be attributed to their tendency to develop aerenchyma that hold apoplastic water. These results, with few exceptions, support the premise that leaf tissues of plants acclimated to marine environments tend to have higher ɛ and lower Ψ(π), and agree with the general tenets of the cell water conservation hypothesis. Oxford University Press 2014-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4025192/ /pubmed/24876296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu014 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Touchette, Brant W.
Marcus, Sarah E.
Adams, Emily C.
Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title_full Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title_fullStr Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title_full_unstemmed Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title_short Bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. Are marine plants more rigid?
title_sort bulk elastic moduli and solute potentials in leaves of freshwater, coastal and marine hydrophytes. are marine plants more rigid?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu014
work_keys_str_mv AT touchettebrantw bulkelasticmoduliandsolutepotentialsinleavesoffreshwatercoastalandmarinehydrophytesaremarineplantsmorerigid
AT marcussarahe bulkelasticmoduliandsolutepotentialsinleavesoffreshwatercoastalandmarinehydrophytesaremarineplantsmorerigid
AT adamsemilyc bulkelasticmoduliandsolutepotentialsinleavesoffreshwatercoastalandmarinehydrophytesaremarineplantsmorerigid