Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910661 |
_version_ | 1782316759147085824 |
---|---|
author | Monzavi, Abbas Siadat, Hakimeh Atai, Mohammad Alikhasi, Marzieh Nazari, Vahideh Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh |
author_facet | Monzavi, Abbas Siadat, Hakimeh Atai, Mohammad Alikhasi, Marzieh Nazari, Vahideh Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh |
author_sort | Monzavi, Abbas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic viscoelastic properties of four commercially available tissue conditioners (TC), Visco-gel (VG), GC Soft-Liner (SL), FITT (FT), and Coe Comfort (CC), relined to modeling plastics with a thickness of 2mm were evaluated after 1 and 7 days of water immersion with the use of storage modulus, loss modulus, and tan delta parameters. Values for these three parameters for each tissue conditioner were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests with P value sets at<0.05. RESULTS: Complex modulus and loss tangent values of TC were not significantly different among specimens containing 0, 2, 5 and 10 wt.%-SZ, respectively. In FT and TC containing 2 wt.%-SZ, these values were not significantly different between 1 and 28 days in both water- and saliva immersions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that relining with modeling plastics does affect TC’s inherent dynamic viscoelastic properties, while the other tissue conditioners investigated may be found to have changed viscoelastic properties as a consequence of vicinity to the modeling plastics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4025435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40254352014-06-06 Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material Monzavi, Abbas Siadat, Hakimeh Atai, Mohammad Alikhasi, Marzieh Nazari, Vahideh Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic viscoelastic properties of four commercially available tissue conditioners (TC), Visco-gel (VG), GC Soft-Liner (SL), FITT (FT), and Coe Comfort (CC), relined to modeling plastics with a thickness of 2mm were evaluated after 1 and 7 days of water immersion with the use of storage modulus, loss modulus, and tan delta parameters. Values for these three parameters for each tissue conditioner were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests with P value sets at<0.05. RESULTS: Complex modulus and loss tangent values of TC were not significantly different among specimens containing 0, 2, 5 and 10 wt.%-SZ, respectively. In FT and TC containing 2 wt.%-SZ, these values were not significantly different between 1 and 28 days in both water- and saliva immersions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that relining with modeling plastics does affect TC’s inherent dynamic viscoelastic properties, while the other tissue conditioners investigated may be found to have changed viscoelastic properties as a consequence of vicinity to the modeling plastics. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-11 2013-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4025435/ /pubmed/24910661 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Monzavi, Abbas Siadat, Hakimeh Atai, Mohammad Alikhasi, Marzieh Nazari, Vahideh Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of physical properties of four tissue conditioners relined to modeling plastic material |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monzaviabbas comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial AT siadathakimeh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial AT ataimohammad comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial AT alikhasimarzieh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial AT nazarivahideh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial AT sheikhzadehsadigheh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial |