Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monzavi, Abbas, Siadat, Hakimeh, Atai, Mohammad, Alikhasi, Marzieh, Nazari, Vahideh, Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910661
_version_ 1782316759147085824
author Monzavi, Abbas
Siadat, Hakimeh
Atai, Mohammad
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nazari, Vahideh
Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh
author_facet Monzavi, Abbas
Siadat, Hakimeh
Atai, Mohammad
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nazari, Vahideh
Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh
author_sort Monzavi, Abbas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic viscoelastic properties of four commercially available tissue conditioners (TC), Visco-gel (VG), GC Soft-Liner (SL), FITT (FT), and Coe Comfort (CC), relined to modeling plastics with a thickness of 2mm were evaluated after 1 and 7 days of water immersion with the use of storage modulus, loss modulus, and tan delta parameters. Values for these three parameters for each tissue conditioner were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests with P value sets at<0.05. RESULTS: Complex modulus and loss tangent values of TC were not significantly different among specimens containing 0, 2, 5 and 10 wt.%-SZ, respectively. In FT and TC containing 2 wt.%-SZ, these values were not significantly different between 1 and 28 days in both water- and saliva immersions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that relining with modeling plastics does affect TC’s inherent dynamic viscoelastic properties, while the other tissue conditioners investigated may be found to have changed viscoelastic properties as a consequence of vicinity to the modeling plastics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4025435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40254352014-06-06 Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material Monzavi, Abbas Siadat, Hakimeh Atai, Mohammad Alikhasi, Marzieh Nazari, Vahideh Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the interaction of tissue conditioners and modeling plastics. This study evaluates the influence of a variety of commercial tissue conditioners on alteration of viscoelastic properties of modeling plastics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the dynamic viscoelastic properties of four commercially available tissue conditioners (TC), Visco-gel (VG), GC Soft-Liner (SL), FITT (FT), and Coe Comfort (CC), relined to modeling plastics with a thickness of 2mm were evaluated after 1 and 7 days of water immersion with the use of storage modulus, loss modulus, and tan delta parameters. Values for these three parameters for each tissue conditioner were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests with P value sets at<0.05. RESULTS: Complex modulus and loss tangent values of TC were not significantly different among specimens containing 0, 2, 5 and 10 wt.%-SZ, respectively. In FT and TC containing 2 wt.%-SZ, these values were not significantly different between 1 and 28 days in both water- and saliva immersions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that relining with modeling plastics does affect TC’s inherent dynamic viscoelastic properties, while the other tissue conditioners investigated may be found to have changed viscoelastic properties as a consequence of vicinity to the modeling plastics. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-11 2013-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4025435/ /pubmed/24910661 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Monzavi, Abbas
Siadat, Hakimeh
Atai, Mohammad
Alikhasi, Marzieh
Nazari, Vahideh
Sheikhzadeh, Sadigheh
Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Physical Properties of Four Tissue Conditioners Relined to Modeling Plastic Material
title_sort comparative evaluation of physical properties of four tissue conditioners relined to modeling plastic material
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910661
work_keys_str_mv AT monzaviabbas comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial
AT siadathakimeh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial
AT ataimohammad comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial
AT alikhasimarzieh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial
AT nazarivahideh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial
AT sheikhzadehsadigheh comparativeevaluationofphysicalpropertiesoffourtissueconditionersrelinedtomodelingplasticmaterial