Cargando…

Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: Geographical variations in adult obesity rates have been attributed in part to variations in social and economic inequalities. Insecurity is associated with obesity at the cross-national level, but there is little empirical evidence to show that insecurity contributes to the structuring o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ulijaszek, Stanley J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24823672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004430
_version_ 1782316765085171712
author Ulijaszek, Stanley J
author_facet Ulijaszek, Stanley J
author_sort Ulijaszek, Stanley J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Geographical variations in adult obesity rates have been attributed in part to variations in social and economic inequalities. Insecurity is associated with obesity at the cross-national level, but there is little empirical evidence to show that insecurity contributes to the structuring of adult obesity rates at the subnational level. This is examined in this study across local authorities in England, using a recently developed social classification for the British population. SETTING: Modelled obesity rates from the Health Survey for England 2006–2008 were related to social class (as estimated from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey of 2011 and a nationally representative sample survey), across 320 local authorities in England. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of mean obesity rates across Z score categories for seven latent social classes were carried out using one-way analysis of variance. Pooled ordinary least square regression analyses of obesity rates by local authorities according to the proportion of different social classes within each of them were performed to determine the extent of geographical variations in obesity rates among the classes that were more greatly based on insecurity (emergent service workers, precariat), and those more closely based on inequality (elite, established middle class, technical middle class, new affluent workers, traditional working class). RESULTS: Adult obesity rates vary negatively across local authorities according to the proportion of people in the elite (F=39.06, p<0.001) and technical middle class (F=8.10, p<0.001) and positively with respect to the proportion of people of the established middle class (F=26.36, p<0.001), new affluent workers (F=73.03, p<0.001), traditional working class (F=23.00, p<0.001) and precariat (F=13.13, p<0.001). Social classes more closely based on inequality show greater association with adult obesity rates across local authorities than social classes more closely based on insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: Both insecurity and inequality are associated with the geographical patterning of adult obesity rates across England.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4025464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40254642014-05-21 Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study Ulijaszek, Stanley J BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: Geographical variations in adult obesity rates have been attributed in part to variations in social and economic inequalities. Insecurity is associated with obesity at the cross-national level, but there is little empirical evidence to show that insecurity contributes to the structuring of adult obesity rates at the subnational level. This is examined in this study across local authorities in England, using a recently developed social classification for the British population. SETTING: Modelled obesity rates from the Health Survey for England 2006–2008 were related to social class (as estimated from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey of 2011 and a nationally representative sample survey), across 320 local authorities in England. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of mean obesity rates across Z score categories for seven latent social classes were carried out using one-way analysis of variance. Pooled ordinary least square regression analyses of obesity rates by local authorities according to the proportion of different social classes within each of them were performed to determine the extent of geographical variations in obesity rates among the classes that were more greatly based on insecurity (emergent service workers, precariat), and those more closely based on inequality (elite, established middle class, technical middle class, new affluent workers, traditional working class). RESULTS: Adult obesity rates vary negatively across local authorities according to the proportion of people in the elite (F=39.06, p<0.001) and technical middle class (F=8.10, p<0.001) and positively with respect to the proportion of people of the established middle class (F=26.36, p<0.001), new affluent workers (F=73.03, p<0.001), traditional working class (F=23.00, p<0.001) and precariat (F=13.13, p<0.001). Social classes more closely based on inequality show greater association with adult obesity rates across local authorities than social classes more closely based on insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: Both insecurity and inequality are associated with the geographical patterning of adult obesity rates across England. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4025464/ /pubmed/24823672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004430 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Ulijaszek, Stanley J
Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title_full Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title_short Do adult obesity rates in England vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? An ecological cross-sectional study
title_sort do adult obesity rates in england vary by insecurity as well as by inequality? an ecological cross-sectional study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24823672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004430
work_keys_str_mv AT ulijaszekstanleyj doadultobesityratesinenglandvarybyinsecurityaswellasbyinequalityanecologicalcrosssectionalstudy